Thanks Scott, 
So you plan to release and connect the new Async API to your Remote Services
implementation before the RS spec is actually "upgraded"? That sounds
interesting.
Is your async implementation also able to delegate the async callback stuff
to the JMS provider, to save threads?
 
Best regards
Mike
 
Scott Lewis wrote:

Hi Mike,

For clarification wrt ECF...

On 3/3/2014 6:39 AM, Mike Wilson wrote:


<stuff deleted> 
 
Have there been any new developments towards standardization of any
asynchronous pattern, or is using ECF or making your own still the main
alternatives?


And BJ said:

> You might want to look at RFC 206 [1] which is ongoing work.

[Scott]  We/ECF are actively tracking and participating in the RFC 206
work...and are committed to supporting both...i.e. 

a) Whatever ends up in R6 spec; and 
b)  Our existing asynchronous remote services approach [1].   

Both will be available via ECF's impl (and for any providers using that
impl) as soon as R6 is released.

Scott

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=428833



_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to