> From: Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected]> > Exact coordinates: > PDF: http://www.osgi.org/download/r5/osgi.cmpn-5.0.0.pdf > > Missing Item 100: > Section: 1.2 Version Information/1.2.2 Component Versions (p.15) > Table 1.1, Item 100?
Thanks! I fixed this informational table for the next Compendium release. Since the table is informational (and not normative), an erratum is not needed. > > Missing New Spec 100: > Section: 1.3 Changes (p.17) Changes sections are informational and thus no erratum is needed. But it should have been listed in the Changes section for Compendium R5. > > PDF: http://www.osgi.org/download/r4v42/r4.cmpn.pdf > Wrong Auto Configuration Version: > Section: 1.2 Version Information/Table 1.1(p.2-850) > Item 115 - Version is listed as 1.2 (but 1.0 on p.421-850) This appears to have been a production error that was later fixes. Since the table is informational, an erratum is not needed. The normative chapter include the correct version number. > > PDF: http://www.osgi.org/download/r4v41/r4.cmpn.pdf > Wrong Auto Configuration Version: > Section 1.2 Version Information/Table 1.1 (p.2-698) > Item 115 - Version is listed as 1.1 (but 1.0 on p.391-698) This appears to have been a production error that was later fixes. Since the table is informational, an erratum is not needed. The normative chapter include the correct version number. > > Do I need to follow some different procedure to get this included in > the Erratas? Since all the mistakes were in informational rather than normative sections, we don't need any errata. But thanks for identifying the issues and I have released a fix for the next Compendium release to include 100 in the informational table. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [email protected] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
