I consider getDataFile an intrinsic part of OSGi since it is the only 
reasonable way for a bundle to have some persistent data. The optionality was 
only there for embedded devices that did not have a file system. Any reasonable 
implementation today has no real excuses not to support it.

As a clarification, even with a SecurityManager you should be able to 
getDataFile, the framework must automatically provide the proper permissions.

Kind regards,

        Peter Kriens




On 10 aug. 2014, at 07:24, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ray
> 
> Not sure, whether the getDataFile method is an anti-pattern. I surely hope 
> not :-)
> 
> We use it here and there as well for bundle-private state information. The 
> nice thing is that it survives bundle updates and automatically cleaned up 
> when the bundle is uninstalled. To me it falls into the category of features: 
> If you know exactly what you are doing, it is a useful thing.
> 
> I think the only caveat is that getDataFile may not be implemented (and of 
> course that it is protected if a SecurityManager is active) on certain 
> platforms.
> 
> Regards
> Felix
> 
> Am 09.08.2014 um 19:26 schrieb Raymond Auge <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hey All,
>> 
>> Over the years osgi has identified a few anti-patterns in it's initial 
>> design (such as activators, etc.)
>> 
>> I'm wondering if 
>> 
>> core/org/osgi/framework/Bundle.html#getDataFile(java.lang.String)
>> 
>> is still considered to be a useful pattern.
>> 
>> My use case is to prevent multiple attempts to perform a DB upgrade process.
>> 
>> Now, this operation is idempotent. However, it's also rather expensive and 
>> could slow initialization considerably so I'd like to persist the fact that 
>> the operation was completed successfully with some sort of stored flag.
>> 
>> Another option would be checking if the bundle has just been installed. Is 
>> this possible? (I believe not).
>> 
>> -- 
>> Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect
>> Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSGi Developer Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSGi Developer Mail List
> [email protected]
> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to