"we don't support multiple "active" extenders like DS" Even DS components use each-other via OSGi services and it does not (and should not) matter if those OSGi services are registered by components within the same bundle.
In case all components are designed in the way that they know only about OSGi services, it should not be a problem to use Blueprint, DS, iPojo together within the same bundle. The problem starts when the components want to know about other components, not OSGi services. *Zsoldos Balázs* Rendszertervező | Software architect +36 70 594 9234 | balazs.zsol...@everit.biz *EverIT Kft.* 1137 Budapest, Katona József utca 17. III. em. 2. http://www.everit.biz I i...@everit.biz Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem alatt áll, a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a címzett, illetve az általa meghatalmazottak használhatják fel. Ha Ön nem az üzenet címzettje, úgy kérjük, hogy telefonon, vagy e-mail-ben értesítse erről az üzenet küldőjét és törölje az üzenetet, valamint annak összes csatolt mellékletét a rendszeréből. Ha Ön nem az üzenet címzettje, abban az esetben tilos az üzenetet vagy annak bármely csatolt mellékletét lemásolnia, elmentenie, az üzenet tartalmát bárkivel közölnie vagy azzal visszaélnie. This message and any attachment are confidential and are legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Please note that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 8:37 PM, BJ Hargrave <hargr...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> > > BJ bundles are not limited to using only a single spec! OSGi is > > modular after all, no? > > > It's entirely possible for a bundle to use several extenders at > > once. This is a completely legitimate use case. > > > This is exactly the case I'm dealing with. > > > I don't think what I'm asking is outlandish. > > It is a case discussed in the OSGi EGs and that we never agreed to solve. > Basically, we don't support multiple "active" extenders like DS, Blueprint > and Web Application Specification each trying to control a bundle. There is > no way to coordinate that as you see. We certainly expect different bundles > to use different technologies, but did not do anything to support a single > bundle to be extended by multiple active extenders. What you are attempting > to do is outside the scope of the existing OSGi specifications. I highly > recommend you split the bundle up so that only a single active extender is > controlling each bundle. > > -- > > *BJ Hargrave* > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the *OSGi Alliance* <http://www.osgi.org/> > *hargr...@us.ibm.com* <hargr...@us.ibm.com> > > office: +1 386 848 1781 > mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > > > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
