I think we need better and more concise information, perhaps a better osgi website, but IRC is not high on my list. And if we do something realtime, please lets open a SLACK channel…
On 8/29/15, 6:00 PM, "osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org" <osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org> wrote: >Send osgi-dev mailing list submissions to > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > osgi-dev-requ...@mail.osgi.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > osgi-dev-ow...@mail.osgi.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of osgi-dev digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. IRC etc. (Raymond Auge) > 2. creating default instances from service factories (Raymond Auge) > 3. Re: creating default instances from service factories > (BJ Hargrave) > 4. Re: creating default instances from service factories > (Raymond Auge) > 5. Re: IRC etc. (Tobias Roeser) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:34:17 -0400 >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >Subject: [osgi-dev] IRC etc. >Message-ID: > <CAMm6HcBo5CTMFA=otwtou_mgeqszmnksgbt_fvvtdg+zo18...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >Hello everyone, > >Would anyone be interested in having a real time channel about osgi? I'm >thinking an IRC channel on freenode, or a gitter room on the github.com/osgi >project or something like that. > >Thoughts? > >-- >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance) >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/53b82483/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:55:39 -0400 >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >Subject: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service factories >Message-ID: > <camm6hcccmz51cdpeo98xhznvitpfng+smsxuefzihyqcapc...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >I'm trying to solve a problem for a friend! [tic] > >He has a factory metatype definition > >e.g. >// still using bnd annotations >@Meta.OCD( > factory = true, > id = "the.pid" >) > >He would like 2 distinct configuration instances having specific properties >set, to be instantiated from this definition "by default" at the start of >the framework (of course once all deps are started and so on...) > >However, I do not like the notion of pragmatically creating the >configurations using the config admin API. > >Is there a more elegant way to do this, preferably using DS? > >-- >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance) >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/534121f0/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:06:37 +0000 >From: "BJ Hargrave" <hargr...@us.ibm.com> >To: osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service > factories >Message-ID: > > <of22f7f48c.f31bf9d4-on00257eaf.00635f97-00257eaf.00637...@notes.na.collabserv.com> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/2544020d/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:15:31 -0400 >From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service > factories >Message-ID: > <camm6hcahukmysfvo2oy8k95bn4bemo7ds4ewsjzgtyr7k3n...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:06 PM, BJ Hargrave <hargr...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >> DS does not make configurations. It just uses them. >> >> Peter has something in enRoute which makes configurations from a resource >> in a bundle: >> https://github.com/osgi/osgi.enroute.bundles/tree/master/osgi.enroute.configurer.simple.provider >> > >After speaking with Tom Watson, I think we realized, like you said, it's >pretty much what Peter is doing in this enroute impl. > >Thanks >- Ray > > >> >> -- >> >> BJ Hargrave >> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM // office: +1 386 848 1781 >> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance // mobile: +1 386 848 3788 >> hargr...@us.ibm.com >> >> >> >> ----- Original message ----- >> From: Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> >> Sent by: osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org >> To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >> Cc: >> Subject: [osgi-dev] creating default instances from service factories >> Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2015 1:56 PM >> >> I'm trying to solve a problem for a friend! [tic] >> >> He has a factory metatype definition >> >> e.g. >> // still using bnd annotations >> @Meta.OCD( >> factory = true, >> id = "the.pid" >> ) >> >> He would like 2 distinct configuration instances having specific >> properties set, to be instantiated from this definition "by default" at the >> start of the framework (of course once all deps are started and so on...) >> >> However, I do not like the notion of pragmatically creating the >> configurations using the config admin API. >> >> Is there a more elegant way to do this, preferably using DS? >> >> -- >> *Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> >> (@rotty3000) >> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> >> (@Liferay) >> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> >> (@OSGiAlliance) >> _______________________________________________ >> OSGi Developer Mail List >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSGi Developer Mail List >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >> > > > >-- >*Raymond Aug?* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) >Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) >Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance) >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://mail.osgi.org/pipermail/osgi-dev/attachments/20150828/bdce947a/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:39:59 +0200 >From: Tobias Roeser <le.petit....@web.de> >To: OSGi Developer Mail List <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] IRC etc. >Message-ID: <201508282139.59594.le.petit....@web.de> >Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" > >There is already a #OSGi channel on freenode (since 2008 I guess). :-) > >But it is almost empty. > >Am Freitag, 28. August 2015, 19:34:17 schrieb Raymond Auge: >| Hello everyone, >| >| Would anyone be interested in having a real time channel about osgi? I'm >| thinking an IRC channel on freenode, or a gitter room on the >| github.com/osgi project or something like that. >| >| Thoughts? > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >OSGi Developer Mail List >osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org >https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > >End of osgi-dev Digest, Vol 106, Issue 16 >***************************************** _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
