On 14/12/15 18:29, Peter Kriens wrote:
NO startlevels is best … :-)

If you really need start levels (and after thinking again) then you can
your set start levels by your management agent. One more reason why only
one bundle is started.

Though start levels can be helpful to make it look like the systems
boots faster, it is too often used to mask bad bundles that are not
properly handling their dependencies. Those bundles will give you pain
in the future so it is better to fix them from the start. And then they
do not need start levels.



As a valid use-case I see the very early starting of a log bundle...
(as an example)

Kind regards,

Peter Kriens




On 14 dec. 2015, at 17:02, Seth Lana <sethlanag...@gmail.com
<mailto:sethlanag...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Peter,

many thanks for your inputs, it really helped us to defined the way
our team should to go.

We had some difficulties defining the requirements of this pilot
project due to, as you said, the large number of possibilities and
combinations that we could have. But we are getting there...

One last doubt, we have found no reference about bundle start level on
both Initial Provisioning and Deployment Admin specs.

In case of IP, we thought about two possibilities. One is to use IP
archive's manifest file to hold the information and let the IP
implementation bundle to use it after it install the bundle. for example:

    InitialProvisioning-Entries:
    org.apache.felix.scr;type=bundle;*startLevel=2*

Another one is to add a text entry on the IP zip. as that will be
stored in the provisioning dictionary then the management agent can
obtain that information using the provisioning service and use it to
set the startLevel.

We are inclined for the option one. which would be the best approach
for you?

best regards,

Seth

On 10-12-2015 11:48, Peter Kriens wrote:
On 9 dec. 2015, at 00:46, Seth Lana<sethlanag...@gmail.com>  wrote:
Hello,
I’m researching about the best ways to provide automatic remote provisioning 
for small devices and also for the servers that will provide content for such 
devices. Reading the OSGi compendium, some specs caught my attention: Initial 
Provisioning, Deployment Admin, Subsystems and Repository Services.

If I got it right, we can have a device with only the OSGi container(with a 
minimal deps) and the IP Agent bundle jars assembled at factory.
Yes. The core idea is that you deliver identical devices to all your customers 
except for the identity (serial number or so).

At first use, the IP agent will contact the remote provisioning service (using 
Http or another protocol) and will download one or more IP zip files containing 
one or more bundles and configuration files defined by the remote provisioning 
operator for that device. All bundles inside the IP zips will be installed by 
the IP agent. So, this process follows until all necessary bundles are 
installed, ending with the Management Agent bundle being started. Am I right?
Yup.

What I found strange was the fact that only one bundle can be started at each 
time (each zip can have only one start entry pointing to only one bundle). Why 
this restriction?
This allows this single bundle to verify the environment, do some checks, and setup 
security &  start levels for example.

Should the Management Agent uninstall the IP agent after it is fully 
operational? or the IP must run every time the device starts up ?
There is no obligation here. Personally, I would make sure that in certain 
situations the device can go back to initial mode so that the operator can 
regain control of the device after a catastrophic event. But again, there are 
not rules defined here.

But the biggest doubt is about that Management Agent itself. It seems that one 
needs to be developed, right?.
Yes. Something needs to provide YOUR policy, this is the management agent. You 
could buy one (this was ProSyst’s answer), there is open source (this was 
Marcel’s answer, or there is building it yourself. I prefer the latter because 
it allows you to provide your policy to the management operations. It is not a 
big deal because the management operations are part of the well defined OSGi 
API and are almost trivial to use.

Should the Management Agent to use a Deployment Admin service provided by 
another bundle or should it be itself the provider of such service?
There are no restrictions here. Make sure the Management Agent only provides 
policy so if you insist on using Deployment Admin then it is not a good idea to 
implement it yourself.

And about the Repository Service, should it be used by the Management Agent or 
Deployment Admin or both?
I think you are focusing too much on all potential possibilities. What are your 
requirements? OSGi is a bit like a box of Lego. Once you have a clear vision of 
how you want to manage your devices you find the components in OSGi. However, 
you can combine these components in infinite ways and exploring all 
combinations is not providing you with the right solution any time soon.

Can a Subsystem (.esa) be package inside a Deployment Package?
You can write your own Resource Processor with Deployment Admin so in principle 
yes. However, both Deployment Admin and subsystems struggle with sharing 
bundles. Deployment Admin took the easy way out and decided to not share 
bundles. Subsystems do allow sharing but struggles because of the complexity 
this creates.

Can the Deployment Packages (*.dp) or Subsystems (*.esa) also be provided by an 
OSGi repository ?
Again yes. You will need to write a Resource Processor and then you can install 
anything anywhere with Deployment Admin.

You might get more useful advice from this group if you provide us with the 
actual use case.

Kind regards,

        Peter Kriens

thanks for any opinion.

regards, Seth.


_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org <mailto:osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev



_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev


--
Ferry Huberts
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to