Hi,

I have not seen any suggestion for naming "utility" and "non-component support bundles" in the EnRoute docs.

Would it be best to just create bundles using the empty template and handle it that way, without any special bundle naming?

What is the different use case(s) for using the adapter type name, considering the functionality is the same as provider?

Regards

Paul Fraser

_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev

Reply via email to