When I type "osgi specifications” into Google the first links I get are:
To the main specifications page you’re already at (this requires you to follow the download link for the version you want) To the HTML version of the R7 core specification To the HTML version of the R7 compendium specification To the wikipedia page listing OSGi specification implementations After that the signal to noise ratio drops pretty rapidly, but that top 4 feels like a pretty good hit rate to me. If I type: "OSGi <name of spec> specifications” into Google then the top link is the HTML version of that specification. Again, this feels like a pretty good hit rate to me, but if you have more ideas of things that could be done then please let us know. The intent is that these documents are easy to find! Best Regards, Tim > On 30 Jan 2019, at 10:36, Paul F Fraser via osgi-dev <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> > wrote: > > Hi David, > > That is fine if you know that. > But searching with google it is almost impossible (or I find it almost > impossible) to find the online vsersion or even know it exists unless you > stumble upon a link that takes you into the online version. > > Paul > > On 30/01/2019 9:00 pm, David Bosschaert wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> If I follow the Download links from there I end up at the actual page that >> contains the specs: https://www.osgi.org/release-7-1/ >> <https://www.osgi.org/release-7-1/> >> That page contains both the PDFs as well as the online ones... >> >> Best regards, >> >> David >> >> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 00:00, Paul F Fraser via osgi-dev >> <osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org <mailto:osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Who or how do I tell someone that the page >> https://www.osgi.org/developer/specifications/ >> <https://www.osgi.org/developer/specifications/> needs >> links to the online spec. >> >> The bugs and issues area seems difficult to use without further study. >> >> A low friction way to report these, relatively minor, but annoying aspects >> of the search for OSGi >> knowledge would be useful. >> >> I suppose someone will suggest that I fix it, but this misses the point. >> >> Paul Fraser >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSGi Developer Mail List >> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org <mailto:osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> >> https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev >> <https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev> > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
