I think it makes sense. Can you register this as a feature request in
the OSGi bugzilla on http://www2.osgi.org?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
CvS> Hi all,
CvS> section 114.11 of the 4.1 compendium spec describes the events that
CvS> should be sent when lifecycle changes for a deploymentpackage take
CvS> place. Unlike, for example, events that are sent for bundle lifecycle
CvS> changes these deploymentadmin events do not contain a reference to the
CvS> concerned deploymentpackage or any additional information like the
CvS> version of the package.
CvS> The spec just says a name and sometimes a successful boolean have to be
CvS> included. I think it would make sense to have extra information in the
CvS> events even for something trivial as being able to produce meaningful
CvS> logging output (without depending on the deploymentadmin to be able to
CvS> get the information manually).
CvS> Would it make sense to have this included in the specification or is
CvS> there a rationale for not doing so?
CvS> friendly,
CvS> Christian van Spaandonk
CvS> _______________________________________________
CvS> OSGi Developer Mail List
CvS> [email protected]
CvS> http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
--
Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
