<http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=18
0218>
http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=180
218

 

Wahhabism & Islam in the U.S. 



By Stephen Schwartz


National Review Online 


June 30, 2003 


Web site:
<http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-schwartz063003.asp>
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-schwartz063003.asp 


EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the text of testimony before the Senate Subcommittee
on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security on Thursday, June 26, 2003.

Chairman Kyl, other distinguished members of the subcommittee, thank you for
your invitation to appear here today. 

I come before this body to describe how adherents of Wahhabism, the most
extreme, separatist, and violent form of Islam, and the official sect in the
kingdom of Saudi Arabia, have come to dominate Islam in the U.S. 

Islam is a fairly new participant at the "big table" of American religions.
The Muslim community only became a significant element in our country's life
in the 1980s. Most "born Muslims," as opposed to those who "converted" - a
term Muslims avoid, preferring "new Muslims" - had historically been
immigrants from Pakistan and India who followed traditional, peaceful,
mainstream Islam.

With the growth of the Islamic community in America, there was no "Islamic
establishment" in the U.S. - in contrast with Britain, France, and Germany,
the main Western countries with significant Islamic minorities.
Historically, traditional scholars have been a buffer against extremism in
Islam, and for various sociological and demographic reasons, American Islam
lacked a stratum of such scholars. The Wahhabi ideological structure in
Saudi Arabia perceived this as an opportunity to fill a gap - to gain
dominance over an Islamic community in the West with immense potential for
political and social influence. 

But the goals of this operation, which was largely successful, were
multiple.

First, to control a significant group of Muslim believers. 

Second, to use the Muslim community in the U.S. to pressure U.S. government
and media, in the formulation of policy and in perceptions about Islam. This
has included liaison meetings, "sensitivity" sessions and other public
activities with high-level administration officials, including the FBI
director, that we have seen since September 11. 

Third, to advance the overall Wahhabi agenda of "jihad against the world" -
an extremist campaign to impose the Wahhabi dispensation on the global
Islamic community, as well as to confront the other religions. This effort
has included the establishment in the U.S. of a base for funding,
recruitment, and strategic/tactical support of terror operations in the U.S.
and abroad.

Wahhabi-Saudi policy has always been two-faced: that is, at the same time as
the Wahhabis preach hostility and violence against non-Wahhabi Muslims, they
maintain a policy of alliance with Western military powers - first Britain,
then the U.S. and France - to assure their control over the Arabian
Peninsula.

At the present time, Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslim community leaders
estimate that 80 percent of American mosques are under Wahhabi control. This
does not mean 80 percent of American Muslims support Wahhabism, although the
main Wahhabi ideological agency in America, the so-called Council on
American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has claimed that some 70 percent of
American Muslims want Wahhabi teaching in their mosques.1This is a claim we
consider unfounded.

Rather, Wahhabi control over mosques means control of property, buildings,
appointment of imams, training of imams, content of preaching - including
faxing of Friday sermons from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - and of literature
distributed in mosques and mosque bookstores, notices on bulletin boards,
and organizational solicitation. Similar influence extends to prison and
military chaplaincies, Islamic elementary and secondary schools (academies),
college campus activity, endowment of academic chairs and programs in Middle
East studies, and most notoriously, charities ostensibly helping Muslims
abroad, many of which have been linked to or designated as sponsors of
terrorism.

The main organizations that have carried out this campaign are the Islamic
Society of North America (ISNA), which originated in the Muslim Students'
Association of the U.S. and Canada (MSA), and CAIR. Support activities have
been provided by the American Muslim Council (AMC), the American Muslim
Alliance (AMA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Graduate School of
Islamic and Social Sciences, its sister body the International Institute of
Islamic Thought, and a number of related groups that I have called "the
Wahhabi lobby." ISNA operates at least 324 mosques in the U.S. through the
North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). These groups operate as an interlocking
directorate.

Both ISNA and CAIR, in particular, maintain open and close relations with
the Saudi government - a unique situation, in that no other foreign
government directly uses religion as a cover for its political activities in
the U.S. For example, notwithstanding support by the American Jewish
community for the state of Israel, the government of Israel does not
intervene in synagogue life or the activities of rabbinical or related
religious bodies in America.

According to saudiembassy.net, the official website of the Saudi government,
CAIR received $250,000 from the Jeddah-based Islamic Development Bank, an
official Saudi financial institution, in 1999, for the purchase of land in
Washington, D.C., to construct a headquarters facility.2

In a particularly disturbing case, the Islamic Development Bank also granted
US$295,000 to the Masjid Bilal Islamic Center, for the construction of the
Bilal Islamic Primary and Secondary School in California, in 1999.3 Hassan
Akbar, an American Muslim presently charged with a fatal attack on his
fellow soldiers in Kuwait during the Iraq intervention, was affiliated with
this institution.

In addition, the previously mentioned official website of the Saudi
government reported a donation in 1995 of $4 million for the construction of
a mosque complex in Los Angeles, named for Ibn Taymiyyah, a historic Islamic
figure considered the forerunner of Wahhabism.4 (It should be noted that Ibn
Taymiyyah is viewed as a marginal, extremist, ideological personality by
many traditional Muslims. In the wake of the Riyadh bombings of 2003, the
figure of Ibn Taymiyyah symbolized, in Saudi public discourse, the inner rot
of the regime. An article in the reformist daily al-Watan was headlined,
"Who is More Important? The Nation or Ibn Taymiyyah"? Soon after it
appeared, Jamal Khashoggi, editor of al-Watan and former deputy editor of
Arab News, was dismissed from his post.) 

The same official Saudi website reported a donation of $6 million, also in
1995, for a mosque in Cincinnati, Ohio.5 The website further stated, in
2000, "In the United States, the Kingdom has contributed to the
establishment of the Islamic Center in Washington DC; the Omer Bin
Al-Khattab Mosque in western Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Islamic Center,
and the Fresno Mosque in California; the Islamic Center in Denver, Colorado;
the Islamic center in Harrison, New York City; and the Islamic Center in
Northern Virginia."6

How much money, in total, is involved in this effort? If we accept a low
figure of control, i.e. NAIT ownership of 27 percent of 1,200 mosques,
stated by CAIR and cited by Mary Jacoby and Graham Brink in the St.
Petersburg Times,7 we have some 324 mosques.

If we assume a relatively low average of expenditures, e.g. $.5 million per
mosque, we arrive at $162 million. 

But given that Saudi official sources show $6 million in Cincinnati and $4
million in Los Angeles, we should probably raise the average to $1 million
per mosque, resulting in $324 million as a minimum.

Our view is that the number of mosques under Wahhabi control actually totals
at least 600 out of the official total of 1,200, while, as noted, Shia
community leaders endorse the figure of 80 percent Wahhabi control. But we
also offer a number of 4-6,000 mosques overall, including small and diverse
congregations of many kinds. 

A radical critic of Wahhabism stated some years ago that $25m had been spent
on Islamic Centers in the U.S. by the Saudi authorities. This now seems a
low figure. Another anti-extremist Islamic figure has estimated Saudi
expenses in the U.S., over 30 years, and including schools and free books as
well as mosques, near a billion dollars.

It should also be noted that Wahhabi mosques in the U.S. work in close
coordination with the Muslim World League (MWL) and the World Assembly of
Muslim Youth (WAMY), Saudi state entities identified as participants in the
funding of al Qaeda.

Wahhabi ideological control within Saudi Arabia is based on the historic
compact of intermarriage between the family of the sect's originator, Ibn
Abd al-Wahhab, and the family of the founding ruler, Ibn Saud. To this day,
these families divide governance of the kingdom, with the descendants of Ibn
al-Wahhab, known as ahl al-Shaykh, responsible for religious life, and the
Saudi royal family, or ahl al-Saud, running the state. The two families also
continue to marry their descendants to one another. The supreme religious
leader of Saudi Arabia is a member of the family of Ibn al-Wahhab. The state
appoints a minister of religious affairs who controls such bodies as MWL and
WAMY, and upon leaving his ministerial post he becomes head of MWL. 

The official Saudi-embassy website reported exactly one year ago, on June
26, 2002, "The delegation of the Muslim World League (MWL) that is on a
world tour promoting goodwill arrived in New York yesterday, and visited the
Islamic Center there." The same website later reported, on July 8, 2002,
"During a visit on Friday evening to the headquarters of the Council on
American Islamic Relations (CAIR) [Secretary-General of the MWL Dr. Abdullah
bin Abdulmohsin Al-Turki] advocated coordination among Muslim organizations
in the United States. Expressing MWL's readiness to offer assistance in the
promotion and coordination of Islamic works, he announced plans to set up a
commission for this purpose. The MWL delegation also visited the Islamic
Center in Washington DC and was briefed on its activities by its director
Dr. Abdullah bin Mohammad Fowaj."8

In a related matter, on June 22, 2003, in a letter to the New York Post,
James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, a civic lobbying
organization, stated that his attendance at a press conference of WAMY in
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, had been organized by the U.S. embassy in the kingdom.
If this is true, it is extremely alarming. The U.S. embassy should not act
as a supporter of WAMY, which, as documented by FDD and the Saudi
Institute,9 teaches that Shia Muslims, including even the followers of
Ayatollah Khomeini, are Jewish agents. 

This is comparable to Nazi claims that Jewish business owners were
Communists, or Slobodan Milo�evic's charge, in the media of ex-Yugoslavia,
that Tito was an agent of the Vatican. The aim is to derange people, to
separate them from reality completely, in preparation for massacres. We fear
that official Saudi anxiety their large and restive Shia minority,
aggravated by Saudi resentment over the emergence of a protodemocratic
regime in Iraq led by Shias, and consolidation of popular sovereignty in
Shia Iran, may lead the Saudi regime to treat Shias as a convenient
scapegoat, making them victims of a wholesale atrocity. The history of
Wahhabism is filled with mass murder of Shia Muslims.

There is clearly a problem of Wahhabi/Saudi extremist influence in American
Islam. The time is now to face the problem squarely and find ways to enable
and support traditional, mainstream American Muslims in taking their
community back from these extremists, while employing law enforcement to
interdict the growth of Wahhabism and its financial support by the Saudis.
If we fail to do this, Wahhabi extremism continues to endanger the whole
world - Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

Thank you for your attention.

NOTES
1 Council on American Islamic Relations, The Mosque in America: A National
Portrait, A Report from the Mosque Study Project, April 26, 2001.

2 Saudi Embassy Press Archive, August 15, 1999.

3 Islamic Development Bank; also, "IDB Allocates $202 Mln to Finance Islamic
Development Ventures," Arabic News, 1/25/2000. 

4 Saudi Embassy Press Archive, July 8, 1995.

5 Saudi Embassy Press Archive, November 10, 1995.

6 Saudi Embassy Press Archive, March 5, 2000.

7 "Saudi Form of Islam Wars With Moderates," St. Petersburg Times, March 11,
2003.

8 Saudi Embassy Press Archive.

9 Ali al-Ahmed and Stephen Schwartz, "Saudis Spread Hate Speech in U.S,"
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Washington, copublished with
Saudi Institute.

Stephen Schwartz is director, Islam and Democracy Program at the Foundation
for the Defense of Democracies. 




 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to