SOFT POWER, HARD TRUTHS
Victor Davis Hanson
Wall Street Journal, February 22, 2005


   Recent books have raved that the European Union is the way of the future.
In contrast, a supposedly exhausted, broke and post-imperial United States
chases the terrorist chimera, running up debts and deficits as it tilts at
the autocratic windmills of the Arab World. That caricature frames the visit
of the president to Europe�  Europe is huffy, but strangely tentative in its
new prickliness.  Short-term positive indicators�trade surpluses, the strong
euro, low inflation and expansion of the EU�are showcased to prove that its
statism and pacifism are the preferable Western paradigm.  But privately
bureaucrats in Brussels are far more worried about different and scarier
long-term concomitant signs: high unemployment, low birthrates, Islamicist
minorities�and a high sounding pacifism that is being increasingly seen
world-wide as base appeasement by friend and enemy alike.

 

   The adage goes that the European Union counts on a more sophisticated and
nuanced �soft power.�  In reality, that translates to using transnational
organizations and its own economic clout to soothe or buy off potential
adversaries�  Everything from idly watching Milosevic and the Hutus butcher
unchecked to unilateral intervention in the Ivory Coast or no action in
[Darfur] usually finds either the proper humanitarian exegesis or the
culpable American bogeyman.  Yet contrary to the mythologies of Michael
Moore and the high talk of Kyoto, most of the international sins of the
recent age--selling a reactor to Saddam, setting up a new arms market in
China, whitewashing Hezbollah, or subsidizing Hamas�were the work of
European avatars of peace.

 

   Such opportunism and its accompanying rhetoric were also predicated on
the convenient specter of the bad-cop America.  We all knew the fall-guy
script: Try as they might, the more sober Europeans could still fail to
restrain reckless Americans�or so they used to warn everyone from Saddam to
the mullahs, especially more recently in the case of scary George,
smoke-�em-out, Bush.  Deal with, or buy from, a sane France or Germany
now�or run for cover from the crazy Americans later.  When the Europeans did
occasionally intervene from Kosovo to the Ivory Coast, there was usually an
American supply ship or C-130 somewhere to be found in the shadows.

 

   After September 11 all that one-sided way of doing business is in
jeopardy� George Bush turned out not just to be a bombs-away Texan, but a
visionary of the Woodrow Wilson and FDR stripe, who risked his re-election,
the American economy, world oil markets�on spreading democracy throughout
the Middle East... If this idealism works, liberated Afghans, Iraqis,
Iranians, and others might see the U.S. as principled as Europe proved
conniving in the days of Oil for Food and extracting oil concessions from
Saddam.  America, in other words, is learning far more about soft power than
the still disarmed Europeans have about hard power�

 

   The Europeans worry not just about American muscular idealism usurping
their prized role as the backroom moral arbiters of globalized society.
Berlin will soon be in range of Tehran�s missiles.  Jihadists went to
Afghanistan, the West Bank, or Iraq from Marseilles or Amsterdam, not from
Detroit and the Bronx.  Enemies of the U.S.�unlike Europe�s�more likely have
to get in rather than come from within...

 

   After the Cold War, we only acerbated an already unwholesome
parent-teenager relationship with the Europeans, who bragged of their new
independence, snapped at their benefactors, but always counted on our
subsidized protection.  That simultaneous denial of and insistence on
dependency was not healthy for a continent with a larger population and
economy than the United States, as contemporary European insecurity always
warred with past glories and unrealized potential capabilities.  Yet, if
Europeans are ever going to enter into a full partnership with America, then
we better let them move out, encourage them to rearm�or hope they find that
the world works according to the refined protocols of The Hague.  America
must have the confidence that the European pandemic continent has evolved
beyond warring against itself�and us as well.  For all the diplomacy of
Secretary Rice and President Bush, it is the Europeans� choice, not our
call.

 

   Until postmodern Europe rightly assumes a role commensurate with its
moral rhetoric, population, and economic strength, out of envy or pride it
will often seek to undercut and occasionally embarrass the U.S.�at least up
to that fine, though ambiguous, point of not quite alienating its hyperpower
patron.  For our part, we cannot ridicule Europe�s present military
impotence only to oppose its nascent efforts at a unified defense
establishment.  So go to it, Europe�one voice, one army, one U.N. Security
Council seat!

 

   The United States should ignore all this ankle-biting, praise the EU to
the skies, but not take very seriously their views on the world until we
learn exactly what is going on inside Europe during these years of its
uncertainty.  America is watching enormous historical forces being unleashed
on the continent from its own depopulation, new anti-Semitism, and rising
Islamicism to Turkish demands for EU membership and further expansion of the
Union�that will bring it to the doorstep of Russia.  Whether its politics
and economy will evolve to embrace more personal freedom, its popular
culture will integrate its minorities, and its military will step up to
protect Western values and visions is unclear.  But what is certain is that
the U.S. cannot remain a true ally of a militarily weak but shrill Europe
should its policies grow even more resentful and neutralist, always nursing
old wounds and new conspiracies, amoral in its inability to act, quite ready
to preach to those who do.

 

   We keep assuming that Europeans are like Britain and Japan when in fact
long ago they devolved more into a Switzerland and Sweden�friendly neutrals
but no longer real allies.  In the meantime, let us Americans keep much more
quiet, wait, and watch�even as we carry a far bigger stick.

 

(Victor Davis Hanson, a military historian and senior fellow at Stanford�s
Hoover Institution, is the author, most recently, of A War like No Other, to
be published this autumn by Random House.)

 

THE WAR FOR EURABIA
Caroline Fourest
Wall Street Journal, February 2, 2005

 

   The Western world, but Europe in particular, is the main battleground for
the Islamists. Secret services regularly thwart terror attacks whose targets
are on European soil. In the past few weeks, France,  Germany and Italy
separately uncovered alleged terrorist cells, including recruiters for the
insurgency in Iraq.

 

   But Europe is also the frontline for Islamists who have chosen a more
"political" approach. Nearly five years ago, Sheik Yusuf Qaradhawi, star
imam on the al-Jazeera news channel and president of the European Fatwa
Council, was very clear: "With Allah's will, Islam shall return to Europe,
and Europeans shall convert to Islam. They will then be able to propagate
Islam to the world."�

 

   The Islamists who were trained or influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood,
the Egyptian group founded by Hassan al-Banna in 1928, share this vision.
Since their failed attempt to seize power in Egypt, and even more since they
lost the civil war in Algeria, Europe has become the top priority: the
Islamists' third round� Their strategies diverge. Terrorists target symbols
of the West through violence. Reformers, on the other hand, have made the
struggle against Westernization the priority--one they lead from Europe,
through mosques and radio shows and publications. In North Africa or the
Middle East, where they pose a direct threat to the regimes in place, they
are closely watched, even chased. But in Europe, they take advantage of free
speech and democracy as well as the failure of Arab immigrants to integrate.
Here, they recruit at their leisure--offering renewed pride and a political
family united by a belief in radical Islam to thousands of alienated
Muslims. The West is used as a formidable base camp to recruit new troops.
With them, the Islamists hope to take their revenge in the East. That's why
the leaders of radical political Islam are found more often in London or
Geneva than in Kabul or Baghdad�

 

   Yusuf Qaradhawi, the telegenic imam, was once expected to become the
Official Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood movement in Egypt. But he refused,
saying that his mission in Europe was the priority. In fact, he retains
great power of influence by presiding over the European Council of the
Fatwa, based in London, which pronounces fatwas (religious rulings) for
European Muslims. One of these fatwas justifies the use of suicide bombings
against civilians. No other Islamic authority, in Egypt or in Iran, has ever
dared to pass a similar ruling. Hamas, the armed branch of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Palestine, has used this European ruling to justify its
operations. The man who guides the Muslims of Europe also says that any
contacts with Jews must be with "the sword and the gun." Yet it is Mr.
Qaradhawi whom the mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, took in his arms July
17 during a rally in favor of the chador organized in the British capital� 

 

   Less talked about is the Leicester Foundation, created by Pakistani
Islamists to propagate the ideas of Sayyid Qutb, the Egyptian thinker who
inspired bin Laden's call for Jihad against the "apostate tyrants," and
Sayyid Abu'l-A'la Mawdudi, the Pakistani theologian who advocates a return
to Sharia law. Though a radical propaganda institute, the foundation
received a prize from Prince Charles--more proof that the Islamists are
quite right to bet on the na�vet� of Western democracies�

 

   Another Islamist safe haven hasn't yet decided to act: Switzerland. With
its long tradition of neutrality and its role as an international banking
center, the country is hesitant to harass Islamists who still have the
moral--and often financial--backing of Saudi investors. At the beginning of
the 1960s, with the patronage and protection of the Saudi royal family,
Hassan al-Banna's favorite disciple, Sa�d Ramadan, was able to establish an
Islamic Center in Geneva, which served as a refuge for the Muslim
Brotherhood and as a base camp for fundamentalists trying to Islamize the
Continent. Since his death in 1995, his sons, all on the administrative
board of the Geneva Islamic Center, have kept up the fight.

 

   The center's official director, Hani Ramadan, has just been fired by the
Swiss Ministry of Education for condoning stoning as an act of purification
and calling AIDS God's punishment in an article in the French daily Le
Monde� A report from the Swiss secret services also includes testimony from
a former Geneva Islamic Center insider who says that he took part in 1991 in
a meeting between Aymen al-Zawahiri, Omar Abdel-Rhaman, the man behind the
1993 World Trade Center bombing, and two of Sa�d Ramadan's sons: Hani and
Tariq Ramadan.

 

   Tariq Ramadan has provoked ample discussion in Europe and the United
States. Hired last year by Notre Dame to teach "peace between
civilizations," the U.S. denied him a visa on security grounds, bringing
criticism from many quarters. But despite his apparently angelic and
irreproachable message, Tariq Ramadan is indeed unqualified to teach on
"peace between civilizations." On television sets and in the many
interviews�he presents himself as a man of dialogue, with no links to the
Muslim Brotherhood�  But in his cassettes and books, distributed in radical
Islamist libraries and shops, he employs a different discourse that explains
and praises the teachings and methods of Hassan al-Banna, without any
critical analysis� Tariq Ramadan openly supports Hamas as a "resistance"
movement. When he's asked whether he approves of the killing of an
8-year-old Israeli child who will grow up to be a soldier, he answers: "That
act in itself is morally condemnable but contextually explicable," since
"the international community has put the Palestinians in the arms of the
oppressors." True to the Muslim Brotherhood's new orientation, Tariq Ramadan
has pronounced the West to be "dar el shaada," which is to say the land
where he is to undertake his religious mission� [F]or all matters relating
to theology, he advises his listeners to turn to his mentor: Yusuf
Qaradhawi. Just like Mr. Qaradhawi, Tariq Ramadan says that he is waiting
for the proof that al Qaeda is�responsible for September 11.

 

   Tariq Ramadan wants to make America his next mission, hoping to seduce
the African-American community, and even the American left-wing. Though
intellectuals--often Arab and/or Muslim ones--have warned against his
influence for the past 15 years, there have always been other intellectuals,
more often than not progressive ones from the West, who get tricked by his
double message, to the point of taking his defense. Even, and especially,
when he claims to be a victim of an Islamophobic or Zionist conspiracy.

 

   Herein lies the greatness and weakness of democracy: Even those who
despise it know how to use it to their advantage. Whether terrorist or
"simply" political ones, the Islamists post a grave threat to Western
democracies. Can this underground guerrilla movement against individual and
public liberties be endlessly tolerated in the name of these same liberties?
And on the other hand, can these liberties be weakened without abandoning
the ideals that make us different from the enemies of democracy? The
solution probably lies in the middle. And it certainly requires that extreme
vigilance be maintained.

 

(Caroline Fourest is the author of  Fr�re Tariq (Grasset, 2004). Alfred de
Montesquiou translated this article from French.)

 

 



CIJR's daily "ISRANET BRIEFING" is available by fax and e-mail.
Please urge colleagues, friends and family to visit our web-site for more
information
on our Briefing series. To join our distribution list, or to unsubscribe,
contact us at http://www.isranet.org/.

 

The daily ISRANET BRIEFING is a service of CIJR. We hope that you find it
useful and that you will support it and our pro-Israel educational work by
forwarding a minimum $36.00 tax-deductible contribution [please send a
cheque or VISA/Mastercard information to CIJR (see cover page for address)].
All donations include a membership-subscription to our respected quarterly
ISRAFAX print magazine, which will be mailed to your home. 

  _____  

CIJR's Briefing series attempts to convey a wide variety of opinions on
Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world for its readers' educational
and research purposes. Reprinted articles and documents express the opinion
of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the
Institute.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to