<http://atimes01.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GC08Aa02.html>
Asia Times Online :: Asian News, Business and Economy.
Mar 8, 2005
They made a democracy and called it peace
By Spengler
This year's 60th anniversary of the Anglo-American victory in World War II
will call forth innumerable orations about the triumph of liberty. Ad
nauseam, we will hear that the occupation of Germany and Japan as well as
the fall of communism set a precedent for the birth of democracy in Iraq,
leading to the spread of democracy throughout the Middle East. If the
experience of World War II and the Cold War were any guide, the Middle East
would be well advised to shun democracy at all costs.
That victory by the United States replaced German, Japanese and Russian
tyranny with democracies is not in doubt. The problem is: where are the
Germans, Japanese and Russians? If the United States had set out to
exterminate its erstwhile enemies, it could not have done a more thorough
job. Its adversaries of World War II and the Cold War are dying out. In the
Islamic world, a breakup of traditional society might produce similar
results. Tacitus' famous dictum ("they made a desert and called it peace")
comes to mind. I insist on the point not because I think it should have
been otherwise, but to admonish Americans to steel themselves for terrible
times ahead.
The Dresden firestorm of February 1945, and the nuclear attack on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki in August of that year, killed more than the few hundred
thousand people known to have died in those bombings. In a broader sense,
those attacks killed all the Germans and Japanese who ever lived, and all
the Germans and Japanese who ever would live. Animals breed by instinct,
but faith in the future is a precondition for the reproduction of human
society. Wounded animals crawl into a hole and die; humiliated cultures
turn sterile and pass out of memory. Germany eschewed democracy for a
reason, believing that its hope for survival lay in collective identity. In
light of the facts, one might say that this belief was not incorrect, but
merely evil and tragic. I do not believe that the Islamic world, either,
will succumb to democratization along American lines without an upheaval on
the scale of World War II.
I intend no criticism of Allied war methods. On the contrary: even the
Jewish diarist Viktor Klemperer, with little access to information, knew
that military logic made Dresden an inevitable target as German troops
withdrew to Saxony from the east. Nuclear bombardment of Japan may have
been a more humane alternative than a conventional invasion. The
consequences of these actions were tragic in the true sense of the term,
namely that they could not be avoided.
In any case, the former Axis powers and the former Soviet Union and its
satellites occupy every one of the top positions on the death row of
demographics. I refer to the United Nations' report "World Population
Prospects: The 2004 Revision".
At the top of the death list is Ukraine, whose population the UN projects
to fall from 46 million to 26 million between 2005 and 2050. Democracy may
have triumphed in Victor Yushchenko's Orange Revolution, but a generation
from now only half as many Ukrainians will be around to talk about it.
Given the rate at which Ukraine exports women of childbearing age, that may
be a special case, but by 2050 Bulgaria will lose more than a third, and
Russia itself more than a fifth of its population. Japan (-12%) and Germany
(-5%) do not look quite as far along the road to extinction, but the
following half-century will do for them. By 2100, Deutsche Bank projects,
only 25 million Germans will remain of the 82 million alive today.
None of this would have surprised the Nazis, who believed with paranoid
fervor that Germany's national existence was in danger. One can hear the
shade of Adolf Hitler saying, "You see, that is just what I anticipated and
wanted to avoid! I warned the Germans that their national existence was in
danger, and now you see that decadent democracy has finished us off."
What the "decadent democracies" of the United States and England finished
off was the delusion of German racial superiority and chosenness as a
master race. Hitler wanted Germany to be a new Eternal People, as I have
written elsewhere (What the Jews won't tell you, November 4, 2003), and for
that reason became obsessed with eliminating the Chosen People of Christian
scripture, namely the Jews. The trouble is that Germany's desire to
reproduce died with its delusions.
No Jewish conspiracy endangered Germany's national existence - German Jews
won decorations for heroism at twice the rate of Christian Germans during
World War I - but rather Germany's own failure of heart. George Bernard
Shaw wrote in 1904 (in Man and Superman) of Europe's coming population
crisis:
The day is coming when great nations will find their numbers dwindling
from census to census; when the six-roomed villa will rise in price above
the family mansion; when the viciously reckless poor and the stupidly pious
rich will delay the extinction of the race only by degrading it; whilst the
boldly prudent, the thriftily selfish and ambitious, the imaginative and
poetic, the lovers of money and solid comfort, the worshippers of success,
of art, and of love, will all oppose to the Force of Life the device of
sterility.
In The Decline of the West (1918), Oswald Spengler quoted Shaw in
predicting an "appalling depopulation" of Europe:
It becomes possible for a Shaw to say "that unless Woman repudiates her
womanliness, her duty to her husband, to her children, to society, to the
law, and to everyone but herself, she cannot emancipate herself". The
primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards
which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now
emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan
literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she
has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of "mutual
understanding." It is all the same whether the case against children is the
American lady's who would not miss a season for anything, or the
Parisienne's who fears that her lover would leave her, or an Ibsen
heroine's who "belongs to herself" - they all belong to themselves and they
are all unfruitful ...
Parenthetically, Henrik Ibsen's "modern" dramas starting with A Doll's
House might be read as satire, a peevish warning of the consequences of
modern sensibilities for society. Ibsen's programmatic statement is found
rather in Emperor and Galilean (1873), in which the Byzantine Emperor
Julian the Apostate attempts to suppress Christianity and revive paganism.
Upon Julian's death, Ibsen has a counselor of Julian's predict the eventual
triumph of paganism:
Yours is a wasteful god, Galileans! He uses up many souls. Were you
[Julian] not the chosen one this time either, sacrificed on the altar of
Necessity? What is it worth, to have lived? Everything's game and chance.
To will is to have to will ...The third empire shall come! The spirit of
man shall reclaim its birthright.
Julian was Ibsen's hero; his Nora was a horrible example of the
consequences of individualist sensibilities, as Shaw and later Oswald
Spengler recognized. Emperor and Galilean persuades me that Ibsen was
something of a proto-fascist.
In the cited passage, Oswald Spengler continues:
At this level all Civilizations enter upon a stage, which lasts for
centuries, of appalling depopulation. The whole pyramid of cultural man
vanishes. It crumbles from the summit, first the world-cities, then the
provincial forms, and finally the land itself, whose best blood has
incontinently poured into the towns, merely to bolster them up awhile. At
the last, only the primitive blood remains, alive, but robbed of its
strongest and most promising elements. This residue is the Fellah type.
Failure to breed first overtook France, whose generals demanded an early
war against Germany for fear that France could not put enough young men in
the field one generation hence (The sacred heart of darkness, February 11,
2003). Hitler saw monsters encircling Germany in his paranoid delusion, but
the monster sat in Germany's own breast and fed on her heart. Friedrich
Nietzsche, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and Hitler hallucinated a new Aryan
heroism anchored in the barbarian past as a remedy for decadence and
decline.
Oswald Spengler himself was an unspeakable racist, fretful that the colored
races would overwhelm the whites. He wrote in Decline, "The apparent
increase of the white population all over the world, little as it is in
comparison with the volume of the colored increase, rests upon a temporary
illusion: the number of children grows ever smaller, and only the number of
adults increases, not because there are more of them, but because they live
longer." To the end he insisted that man was a "beast of prey". Nonetheless
he recoiled in horror at the Nazi solution. He wrote of "brave pessimism"
and the "tragic" courage to sacrifice for greatness, but does not appear to
have considered that the tragic conclusion was destined for him and
everyone like him.
Those who seem to think that such provocations as the murder of Theo van
Gogh by terrorists will revive Europe's will to live, eg Victor Davis
Hanson, sadly misestimate the depth to which Europe has sunk. After World
War I, I wrote two years ago, "no shred of credibility was left in the
Christian idea of souls called out of the nations for salvation beyond the
grave. In 1914 Europe's soldiers still fought under the illusion of a God
that favored their nation. Germany fought World War II under the banner of
revived paganism. For today's Europeans, there is no consolation, neither
the old pagan continuity of national culture, nor the Christian continuity
into the hereafter" (Why Europe chooses extinction, April 8, 2003). Europe
will offer no resistance to Islam, which will triumph in that continent no
later than 2100, according to Bernard Lewis.
Even if Washington succeeded in establishing friendly regimes in most of
the Middle East, an eventual Arab majority in Europe will confront America
with a hydra-headed beast that cannot easily be thwarted.
For what Spengler called "Faustian culture", an appropriate epitaph is the
one that Mephistopheles offered at the grave of Faust:
Vorbei! ein dummes Wort. Warum vorbei?
Vorbei und reines Nicht: vollkommnes Einerlei! ...
"Da ists vorbei!" Was ist daran zu lesen?
Es ist so gut, als waer es nicht gewesen.
("It's over? A stupid expression. Why, "It's past?" Past and pure nothing -
perfect sameness? "It's over" - how should one understand that? It is just
as good as if it never existed.) Nowhere is it written that all cultures
should exist forever. Some of them are quite unpleasant, and we are well
rid of some of them. No one misses the passing of German culture more than
I - no longer is it possible to hear a straightforward rendering of the
dramas of Gotthold Lessing or Friedrich von Schiller - but there is nothing
to be done for it. Thomas Mann explained why in Dr Faustus.
US President George W Bush fell wide of the mark when he declared in his
second Inaugural Address, "We have confidence because freedom is the
permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the
soul." Human beings do not first of all wish to be free, but to be
remembered, that is, to have lives that are significant. US democracy
depends upon a religious foundation; the individual first must assume the
yoke of responsibility (to God, country, family and so forth) in order to
exercise freedom. In the vast majority of other instances human beings
prefer a collective identity as a source of meaning; that was the message
of the most prestigious of 20th-century philosophers, the abominable Martin
Heidegger.
One can destroy collective identity by main force, as US occupiers did in
the former Axis countries, or batter it down by external pressure, as in
the case of the Cold War. Whether the adversary society resists to the end,
as in the case of Germany, or gives up without a shot, as in the case of
the Soviet Union, is a matter of happenstance. In either case the result
has been to push these societies down the road to extinction.
The United States has sufficient power to persuade Iraq's religious and
tribal leaders to march their people to the polls as a condition for
sharing power in a new government (The dotage of Iraq's democracy, February
2), or for that matter to extort a gesture toward multi-party elections out
of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. But I do not believe that the Islamic
world will abandon its long-developed sense of collective identity in favor
of US-style democracy without tragic consequences.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
