Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of the war on terror and related matters. I hope you find it interesting. You may link to it on the web here:
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20050307-071958-6783r If you have any comments or questions about this piece, need any more information about UPI products and services, or want to stop receiving these alerts, please get in touch. Thank you, Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 202 898 8081 Rendition a routine practice for 20 years By Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, March 8 (UPI) -- Rendition -- the quasi-legal procedure by which the United States hands terror suspects over to foreign governments for interrogation or trial -- has been practiced by the CIA for nearly two decades, and long prior to Sept. 11 was a routine, publicly acknowledged counter-terrorism technique conducted more than a dozen times a year. One former intelligence official with detailed knowledge of the practice pre-Sept. 11 told United Press International that decisions about who should be handed over were sometimes made by junior officials and that, in certain cases, the CIA neither sought nor received assurances that suspected terrorists would not be tortured. Other former and serving officials said that although both the authorities and the frequency of the practice have been dramatically expanded since Sept. 11, 2001, CIA rendition dates to 1986 and the establishment under President Reagan of the agency's Counterterrorist Center. "It was a fairly routine practice," said Jeffrey Smith, who was general counsel to the CIA 1995-96. The practice has recently become the subject of controversy, with allegations from human-rights groups and some Democratic lawmakers that the United States is deliberately sending suspected terrorists to countries where they will be tortured. Administration officials deny the charge. "We neither use nor condone torture," a CIA official authorized to speak for the agency told United Press International Monday. The official, like others in the administration, declined further comment. But the United States was not always so coy about the practice. On Feb. 2, 2000, CIA Director George Tenet told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that "working with foreign governments worldwide, we have helped to render more than two dozen terrorists to justice" since July 1998. More than half, he added, were members of al-Qaida. "These renditions have shattered terrorist cells and networks, thwarted terrorist plans, and in some cases even prevented attacks from occurring," Tenet boasted. Though he did not say so, it is clear that the majority of those he was speaking about were sent to Egypt or Jordan, where -- for suspected terrorists at least -- torture was commonplace. The former intelligence official called the pre-Sept. 11 rendition process "very informal." "Say someone was wanted in country A. He could be arrested in country B for some minor immigration or criminal violation, or picked up in transit," the former official said. In order to avoid what the former official called "the enormously cumbersome and sometimes impossible process" of extradition, U.S. personnel would simply deliver the suspect to the country where he was wanted. "Generally, (the suspect) would be handed over (by law enforcement or intelligence officials of country B) on the tarmac, at the end of the runway, at night, and then flown to country A." The former official said that, where there were charges against the suspect, or a warrant for their arrest, no assurance about treatment from the country he was delivered to was required. "The only requirement was that there be some kind of legal process (to which the rendered person would be subject) in country B." The former official also said that decisions about who to render were sometimes taken at a low level, without consultation with the White House or other agencies. "This fell squarely under the long-standing authorities for covert action we had under the Reagan finding (that established the CIA Counterterrorist Center in May 1986)." Exceptions to this rule, the former official said, were cases where individuals were rendered back to the United States for prosecution, operations where U.S. personnel might be hurt or killed, or if there was a danger that the U.S. role might be exposed. Other former officials said that much more extensive consultation was carried out with White House and Justice Department officials. "It was a principal-level decision," said one former White House official, referring to the Cabinet-rank members of the National Security Council: the attorney general, the national security adviser and the secretary of state. Smith said that the CIA looked at every operation "on a case-by-case basis and dealt with (it) at the appropriate level." He said that where the role of U.S. personnel was "more limited," decisions could be taken at a lower level "depending on the judgment of those involved." Several of the officials who spoke to UPI were adamant that assurances were always sought about the treatment of those being rendered. But the former intelligence official insisted that this was only done where the rendition was for the purposes of interrogation or intelligence-gathering, rather than for prosecution or law enforcement. "We were just a taxi service," the former official said. "We were just delivering that person to a criminal-justice process." Smith maintains that the United States would never knowingly have aided or abetted in torture. "We always took into account the question, 'How will this person be treated?'" he said. One current U.S. official told UPI that "the nature of this tool has changed" since Sept. 11. The new authorities were granted in a highly classified presidential memorandum signed by President Bush on Sept. 17, 2001. -- (Please send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Copyright � 2001-2005 United Press International ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for anyone who cares about public education! http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
