Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of the war on terror and related matters. I hope you find it interesting. You may link to it on the web here:
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20050307-100706-9098r If you have any comments or questions about this piece, need any more information about UPI products and services, or want to stop receiving these alerts, please get in touch. Thank you, Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 202 898 8081 Ex-CIA lawyer calls for law on rendition By Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, March 8 (UPI) -- A former general counsel of the CIA is calling for Congress to legislate on three controversial areas of the war on terror: interrogation, detention and rendition, in which suspected terrorists are handed over to third countries. Jeffrey Smith, who was the CIA's top lawyer 1994-95, told United Press International that it was time to end the uncertainty and secrecy surrounding these three practices and provide a legislative basis for them. Smith argues that it is time for Congress to "step up to the plate." "I believe the time has come for the United States to adopt laws covering these practices. "Much of this," he said of the deployment of expanded powers of detention and other new techniques in the war on terror since Sept. 11, 2001, "has been done by presidential order without any real oversight or authorization from Congress." On Sept. 17, 2001, less than a week after the suicide hijackings that resulted in the deaths of some 3,000 people, President Bush signed a highly classified legal document known as a "memorandum of notification." The document gave the CIA broad authorities to use against those it suspected of being among the United States' terrorist enemies. For the first time, the agency was authorized to detain and interrogate people. The agency was also granted greatly extended powers to render people suspected of involvement in terrorism. Rendition is a quasi-legal process under which the United States will receive custody of people -- or seize them -- abroad and deliver them to a third country. In the past it was used primarily to deliver people to countries where they were wanted for terrorist crimes so that they could be tried. Since Sept. 11, say officials, there has been a large increase in the number of so-called intelligence renditions, where people are delivered to countries so that they can be interrogated. Officials say publicly that they do not render suspects to countries where they will be tortured. "We have an obligation not to render people to countries if we believe they would torture them," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters Monday. "And we do -- and we do get assurances on those matters." But at the same time, McClellan seemed at a loss to explain what other reason there might be for turning a suspect over to Uzbekistan. "I'm not going to get into talking about specific intelligence matters," he said when questioned about the choice of Uzbekistan as a destination for rendition. "Those are classified matters, for good reason. "But if you're talking about terrorists who have been apprehended in the war on terrorism, we do have an obligation to gather intelligence from them," he concluded. Despite official reassurances, there have been several well-documented cases since Sept. 11 of rendered individuals being abused or mistreated. One man, Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who was sent by U.S. officials to Syria where he was tortured, is suing the U.S. government. And Italian prosecutors are investigating the February 2003 disappearance of Hassan Osama Nasr, an Egyptian-born Islamic cleric who his family says was kidnapped in Milan by CIA officials and flown to Egypt. CIA Director Porter Goss told a recent congressional hearing that the agency had "a responsibility of trying to ensure that (persons rendered) are properly treated." He added that there could be no guarantees once the person had left U.S. custody, but concluded, "We do have an accountability program for those situations." Smith said that, in such an atmosphere, with lawsuits and media reports flying, it was possible that standards would change and "what was thought entirely appropriate 18 months ago may not be thought so now." He said legislation would provide permanent standards and enable the country's intelligence officials to be sure of their ground. At the moment, he said, CIA officials were "increasingly worried that they will be held personally or even criminally liable for what they have been asked to do for their country." -- (Please send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Copyright � 2001-2005 United Press International ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
