http://www.danielpipes.org/article/2447

A Neo-Conservative's Caution

by Daniel Pipes
New York Sun
March 8, 2005

[NYS title: "Good News Could End In Mideast"]
I have never quite figured out what views define a neo-conservative,
and whether I am one or not, but others long ago decided this matter
for me. Journalists use "neo-conservative" to describe me, editors
include my writings in a neo-conservative anthology, critics plumb my
views for insight into neo-conservative thinking, and event hosts
invite me to represent the neo-conservative viewpoint.
As some of my oldest friends and closest allies are called
neo-conservative, I happily accept this appellation. Indeed, it has a
certain cachet, given that no more than 50 Americans have been called
neoconservative, yet we allegedly drive American foreign policy.
I mention all this because neoconservative policies in the Middle East
have been looking pretty good the past two months, as Max Boot
amplifies in a column titled "Neocons May Get the Last Laugh":
�       On January 9, Palestinian Arab voters trooped to the polls and chose
Mahmoud Abbas, who proclaims his intent to end the armed struggle
against Israel. 
�       On January 30, 8 million Iraqi voters braved bombs and bullets to
cast their ballots. 
�       On February 10, Saudi Arabia held its first-ever municipal
elections, a crack in the royal family's absolute authority. 
�       On February 26, Egypt's president Husni Mubarak suddenly announced
that the forthcoming presidential election will involve candidates
other than himself. 
�       On February 28, tens of thousands of demonstrators in Beirut forced
the resignation of the pro-Syrian government of Prime Minister Omar
Karami. 
�       If the Lebanese succeed in winning their independence, it could
spell the end of Bashar Assad and the Baathist regime in Damascus.
These developments find some neo-conservatives in a state of
near-euphoria. Rich Lowry of the National Review calls them "a
marvelous thing." Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post writes
that "We are at the dawn of a glorious, delicate, revolutionary moment
in the Middle East."
I too welcome these developments, but more warily. Having been trained
in Middle Eastern history makes me perhaps more aware of what can go
wrong:
�       Yes, Mahmoud Abbas wishes to end the armed struggle against Israel
but his call for a greater jihad against the "Zionist enemy" points to
his intending another form of war to destroy Israel. 
�       The Iraqi elections are bringing Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a pro-Iranian
Islamist, to power. 
�       Likewise, the Saudi elections proved a boon for the Islamist
candidates. 
�       Mubarak's promise is purely cosmetic; but should real presidential
elections one day come to Egypt, Islamists will probably prevail there
too. 
�       Removing Syrian control in Lebanon could well lead to Hezbollah, a
terrorist group, becoming the dominant power there. 
�       Eliminating the hideous Assad dynasty could well bring in its wake
an Islamist government in Damascus.
Note a pattern? Other than the sui generis Palestinian case, one main
danger threatens to undo the good news: that a too-quick removal of
tyranny unleashes Islamist ideologues and opens their way to power.
Sadly, Islamists uniquely have what it takes to win elections: the
talent to develop a compelling ideology, the energy to found parties,
the devotion to win supporters, the money to spend on electoral
campaigns, the honesty to appeal to voters, and the will to intimidate
rivals.
This drive to power is nothing new. In 1979, Islamists exploited the
shah's fall to take power in Iran. In 1992, they were on their way to
win elections in Algeria. In 2002, they democratically took over in
Turkey and Bangladesh. Removing Saddam Hussein, Husni Mubarak, Bashar
Assad, and the Saudi princes is easier than convincing Middle Eastern
Muslim peoples not to replace them with virulent Islamist ideologues.
The Middle East today is not alone in its attraction to a totalitarian
movement � think Germany in 1933 or Chile in 1970 � but it is unique
in the extent and persistence of this allure. I worry that my fellow
neo-conservatives are insufficiently focused on its implications.
President Bush deserves high praise for his steadfast vision of a free
Middle East; but his administration should proceed slowly and very
carefully about transferring power from autocrats to democrats. The
Middle East's totalitarian temptation, with its deep questions of
history and identity, needs first to be confronted and managed. To
skip these steps could leave the region even worse off than during the
era of unelected tyrants.











------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. 
Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to