http://www.stratfor.com

"The LAV is experiencing many of the same problems that new weapon
systems often do during their shakedown cruise in combat." 
Media Report on 'Stryker' Misleading 

By Andrew Teekell

On March 31, The Washington Post reported that the U.S. Army's Stryker
Light Armored Vehicle (LAV), which has been operating in Iraq for a
year and a half, is not faring so well in the war zone. The
eight-wheeled vehicle is inadequately armored, its computers are too
slow and crew accommodations provide inadequate protection during
rollovers. 

Deficiencies noted, but the media is a bit behind the curve. 
The report cites a four-month-old Army report on the LAV's performance
in Iraq that did in fact find room for improvement in the Stryker --
improvement that already has been implemented or soon will be. Since
first arriving in Iraq in October 2003, the vehicles and their crews
have been adapting well to the mission and the environment. 

Army personnel at Fort Lewis, Wash., home to the units that deploy the
Stryker, tell Stratfor the LAV is experiencing many of the same
problems that new weapon systems often do during their shakedown
cruise in combat. 

One problem, which most likely will be addressed on the assembly line,
is that the tire pressure has to be checked too frequently because of
the weight of the extra armor that protects the crew from insurgent
rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs). The armor is a field modification
installed when the vehicles arrive in Kuwait and before they cross the
border into Iraq. Although the armor is saving lives, the Stryker's
suspension and tires were not designed to handle the extra weight. 

The Army report also cites problems with the Stryker's computer
systems. The commander's display fails to function properly and the
computers slow down or freeze up when processing large amounts of
data. Sources at General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc., the Stryker's
manufacturer, say the computer issues have been addressed with
software upgrades. 

The data processing and command and control equipment in the Strykers
are completely new systems that had never been used in combat vehicles
before the Strykers went to Iraq. 
In addition, the vehicle's grenade launcher has proven to be difficult
to operate under combat conditions. This is a problem that can be
remedied with interim field modifications or improvements on the
assembly line. 

The Stryker is deployed with the 3rd Brigade of the Army's 2nd
Infantry Division in Iraq. Since February 2004, when the "Stryker
Brigade" deployed to Kirkuk and Mosul, two vehicles have been lost to
RPG fire. Other vehicles have been totaled by landmines and improvised
explosive devices. Casualties have been sustained in most cases, but
few Stryker crewmembers have been killed.
 
The first version of a weapon system often requires refinement after
being used operationally. During World War II, the M4 Sherman tank was
plagued by inadequate firepower and thin armor and was shot full of
holes by the powerful German tanks it encountered in Normandy. To give
themselves a better chance of surviving encounters with the Panzers,
Sherman crews took to bolting scrap armor plate to the front and sides
and tying sandbags to the front.
 
An even more notable example of military field expediency is the rapid
"up-armoring" of the Army's "Humvee" fleet in Iraq, which was
introduced into a combat environment that it was not designed for.
There have been dozens of modifications to the F-16 fighter and 
M-2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle since these systems were first deployed.
Even the mighty 
F-117 Stealth fighter performed poorly when first used in combat in
Panama in 1989. 

These problems are not exclusive to the U.S. military. The suspensions
of Soviet T-72 tanks used in Afghanistan were found to be inadequate
for the country's rough terrain, so the T-72 was replaced by the older
T-62. During Russia's involvement in Chechnya, the gas turbine engines
on their T-80 tanks proved to be problematic and were replaced with
diesel engines in later models. The British army's Challenger tank was
completely redesigned to address problems noted during gunnery
exercises and the 1991 Gulf War. 

The Stryker was developed for the emerging doctrine of a lighter and
more rapidly deployable force. It was a controversial shift from an
Army based on heavy divisions meant to engage massed Soviet formations
to a force more suited to low-intensity conflict and intervention. 

When it was introduced, the Stryker was derided by critics of the new,
lighter Army. So far, however -- despite some teething troubles -- the
Stryker has proven itself in combat. Experience in Iraq has shown that
the Main Battle Tank still has a place on the urban battlefield --
U.S. troops like the firepower and psychological advantage that the
70-ton 
M-1 gives them. And, from all accounts, they like the Stryker too. 







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to