Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of U.S. intelligence and related matters. I hope you find it interesting. You may link to it on the web here:
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20050425-054816-4621r UPI subscribers received this story when it was first published on Monday. If you have any comments or questions about this piece, need any more information about UPI products and services, or want to stop receiving these alerts, please get in touch. Thank you, Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 202 898 8081 WMD commission sued over secrecy By Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, April 25 (UPI) -- Anti-proliferation campaigners are suing the presidential commission on weapons of mass destruction intelligence, which they say is bound by federal law to publish transcripts of its meetings. "The bottom line is we want some visibility into the process, some idea of how they came to the conclusions they did," Jules Zacher, special counsel to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, told United Press International. The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction met entirely in closed session during its 14 months of existence. "Due to the sensitive nature of our work, which concerns highly classified matters of national security, these meetings are not open to the public," says a commission statement on its Web site. "We nonetheless intend to keep the public informed of our work, and as we progress we welcome public input and comment," concludes the statement. "They invited public participation, but it was a sham," said Zacher. "We couldn't even find out where they were meeting." He said the center wrote to the commission asking how to submit evidence or testimony but never heard anything back. The center's lawsuit, filed recently in the D.C. District Court, says that, according to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, "the records, reports transcripts, minutes appendices, working papers, drafts, studies agenda (and) other documents which were made available to or prepared for or by each advisory committee" should be available to the public. The commission says the act doesn't apply to them. "Which arguments are made in court is up to the Justice Department," which will be defending the case, the commission's general counsel, Stewart Baker, told UPI. The act has exemptions for work done that will provide advice to the CIA, said Baker, adding that there are also constitutional issues about whether Congress can so tightly regulate presidential advice. Zacher accepts that, by its nature, much of the commission's work needed to stay secret, "But I find it hard to believe that everything they discussed, every word they spoke, is classified." The case is the latest battlefront in a war of attrition between the Bush administration and open-government campaigners and highlights the contrast between the presidential commission -- which met entirely in secret -- and the highly publicized open hearings of the Sept. 11 inquiry. Commission officials say they worked hard to get a plethora of historical detail about this most sensitive area of intelligence into the public domain in their final report. "I think we did pretty well on that," said Baker, adding that conducting the work in public would have been all but impossible, and "in the end I don't think it would have helped the end product or made the public better informed." Zacher says the arguments the government and commission are using are similar to those being used to defend against other public-interest lawsuits like those seeking the release of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy taskforce documents. "Essentially they are saying that no individual can bring a lawsuit to enforce (the act), that only Congress can enforce it. That would totally vitiate the law." In its final report, published last month, the commission found that U.S. intelligence was "dead wrong" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and made a set of recommendations for overhauling the nation's spy agencies. -- (Please send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
