http://www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=275426

 
Congress Probes Routing of Funds To Suspect Firms 
 
By Claudia Rosett 

The New York Sun 
May 4, 2005 

Investigators looking into the U.N. oil-for-food program, poring over
documents provided to Congress here, are discovering that vast sums
intended for humanitarian purposes in Iraq were rerouted through a
global web of companies with links to terrorist funding and arms
trafficking. 

The fresh clues to the money trail are emerging from a House hearing
that focused last week on BNP Paribas, the French bank picked by the
United Nations to service the bulk of the U.N.-supervised deals. At
the hearing, one of its officers acknowledged a number of what he
characterized as "mistakes" in the handling of funds under the
oil-for-food program.

But the documents provided by BNP under congressional subpoena and
examined by The New York Sun suggest to congressional investigators
that some of these mistakes involved the rerouting of money through a
global web of companies linked not only to terrorist funding and arms
trafficking but also to anti-sanctions campaigning and front
operations for the Iraqi regime itself.

Even in the context of an oil-for-food program that encompassed more
than $110 billion of Saddam's oil sales and relief purchases, these
payments to third parties were not small change. Payments rerouted
inside BNP - against U.N. rules but evidently without protest from
Turtle Bay - totaled at least $470 million, documents in the
possession of Congress indicate. 

Until last week's hearing by the House Subcommittee on Oversight and
Investigations, this maze of meandering money remained hidden from
public view. The transfers took place by way of proceeds from letters
of credit, with which BNP was supposed to guarantee payment from the
U.N.-managed oil-for-food account to a given contractor, but instead
sent the money to a third party, apparently with the consent of the
contractors thus deprived of funds due to them. Whatever the aim, the
effect was the secret transfer of money, in contravention of the
strict controls oil for food was meant to impose on Saddam's business.
These breaches were obscured by a double-wall of BNP confidentiality
and U.N. secrecy during its program, which ran from 1996 to 2003. 

Even today, not one of the ties associated with this money trail has
yet been brought to light by the U.N.-authorized investigation
launched almost a year ago by a former Federal Reserve chairman, Paul
Volcker.
At last week's hearing, it turned out that BNP's New York branch
redirected at least 403 payments from the U.N.-held oil-for-food
account, sending funds in these cases not to the contractors approved
by the United Nations for specific deals but to third parties. Why
exactly BNP did so, and why the United Nations did not stop it, are
questions into which investigators are still delving.

Other questions were raised by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican of
California, who led the hearing. Mr. Rohrabacher asked not only
whether BNP was in breach of its U.N. contract, but whether in light
of the large sums transferred to some of the obscure or even, as the
congressman put it, "shady" companies on the list, the bank had
complied with know-thy-customer rules. BNP's chief executive for North
America, Everett Schenk, defended the bank's actions, testifying that
under the vast oil-for-food program, involving the processing of some
20,000 letters of credit, "mistakes are perhaps inevitable."

Mr. Schenk further noted that some of the third-party payments went to
companies, or to "affiliates" of companies, authorized by the United
Nations via separate contracts to sell goods to Saddam's regime under
oil for food, and that BNP had relied on the United Nations to vet
such companies. He added, "We do not believe that any of these
departures from procedures that we've identified today have caused or
contributed to corruption under the program."

There are 80 as-yet-undisclosed third-party payments still under
review by BNP that, according to Mr. Rohrabacher, "BNP does not fully
understand." The bank's own auditors found that the flow of
oil-for-food paperwork was "irrational."

While some of the companies may be innocent and some of the transfers
may have been simple mistakes, there are also signs that this list
provides a map to at least part of the financial network Saddam used
to evade U.N. sanctions and corrupt the U.N. program meant to contain
him - as he was doing, according to testimony last fall of the Central
Intelligence Agency's chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer.

The number of companies involved was relatively small, a few dozen out
of the more than 3,000 contractors tapped by Saddam under U.N. terms
that let him choose, subject to U.N. veto, his own business partners.
Among several of this band, the rerouted payments were copious. In
some cases, they form a latticework of disturbing associations. These
include such U.N.-approved dealers as Al Wasel & Babel General
Trading, based in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, which sold $384 million
of goods to Saddam under oil for food.

Last April, the U.S. Treasury designated Al Wasel & Babel as a front
for officials of the Saddam regime. Ac cording to the Treasury, Al
Wasel & Babel - under the guise of selling Saddam humanitarian goods -
not only tried to buy a surface-to-air missile system for Iraq when it
was under U.N. sanctions, but also "played a key role in the former
Iraqi regime's schemes to obtain illicit kickbacks in goods purchased
through the oil-forfood program."

As it turns out, BNP, by its own account, rerouted more than $5.7
million due to Al-Wasel & Babel to another company, Al Douh, in 2002.
BNP's report to Congress describes this company as a Jordanian company
with U.N.-approved affiliates, although Al-Douh itself was not a
U.N.-approved dealer. But Al-Douh had other connections: BNP's roster
of third-party payments shows that in the final year of oil for food,
just before the American-led coalition overthrew Saddam in April,
2003, Al-Douh received more than $29 million redirected by BNP from
funds that Saddam's regime owed to a South African company, Falcon
Trading.

Falcon Trading belonged to a Detroit businessman, Shakir al-Khafaji.
According to a Wall Street Journal report last year, Mr. al-Khafaji, a
campaigner against U.N. sanctions on Iraq, not only brought American
and South African political delegations to Baghdad to denounce
American policy, but also funded an anti-sanctions documentary by a
former U.N. weapons inspector, Scott Ritter.
The BNP record also shows in 2002 yet more money due to Falcon Trading
under oil for food, totaling $2.5 million, was rerouted by the bank to
a company called East Star Trading Company. 

East Star was not a U.N.-approved dealer, but received more than $100
million in third-party payments rerouted from a variety of
U.N.-approved contractors. In BNP's report to Congress, East Star is
described as registered in 1990 in the Cayman Islands and affiliated
with a Malaysia-based company called Pacific Inter-Link.
Both companies are reported by BNP as 100% owned by yet another
company, Commodities House Investment. Asked by Mr. Rohrabacher for
details of who owns Commodities House Investment and who runs East
Star, BNP's Mr. Schenk was unable to supply answers. "This stinks,"
Mr. Rohrabacher said.

BNP was able, however, to supply Mr. Rohrabacher with the information
that whoever might have been in charge of East Star, the company over
the period 2000-03 received more than $80 million in BNP rerouted
oil-for-food payments that were officially due to a Saudi Arabia-based
supplier, Al Riyadh International Flowers, which BNP described as
"reportedly" owned by a member of the Saudi royal family, Prince
Bandar Bin Mohammed Bin Abdulrahm Al Saud. He is not the Prince Bandar
who is the Saudi ambassador to America.

The Prince Bandar in question also turns up personally on the list of
BNP's third-party payments, as having received, in 1999, $353,500
rerouted from another of his companies, Zahrat Al-Riyadh. This in turn
shows up on the BNP list as having had about $29 mil lion in
oil-for-food payments rerouted by BNP in 1999-2000 to the Saskatchewan
Wheat Pool.

Along with receiving funds redirected from Al-Riyadh, East Star
received third-party payments via BNP totaling at least $8 million
from its U.N.-approved affiliates, Malaysia-based Pacific Inter-Link
and three related companies in Southeast Asia (and more third-party
payments reassigned from dealers in places such as Russia and Ukraine).

BNP's report to Congress notes that Pacific Inter-Link "is a member of
the Yemen-based Hayel Saeed Anam Group, one of the oldest and most
noted business conglomerates in the Arab world." The Hayel Saeed
Group, with affiliates in places such as Malaysia and Indonesia,
supplied hundreds of millions of dollars of goods to Saddam's regime
via oil for food.

What BNP did not mention to Congress, though it was reported last fall
by Fox News, in an article by this reporter and Fox News's executive
editor, George Russell, is that both Pacific Inter-Link and the Hayel
Saeed Anam Group have on their boards of directors a member of the
family, Hayel Saeed Abdul Rahman, who was a charter member in 1984 of
a business chamber founded in Lugano, Switzerland, by members of the
terrorist Muslim Brotherhood - the Malaysian, Swiss Gulf, and African
Chamber, or MIGA. Shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on
America, MIGA was named by the United Nations as a terrorist-financing
outfit, and added to the U.N. watch-list of entities belonging to or
affiliated with Al Qaeda.

Pacific Inter-Link has denied any connection between MIGA and Mr.
Abdul Rahman, who has recently been based in Jeddah. His name as of
last fall was still on MIGA's Swiss registry documents, along with
that of U.N.-designated terrorist financier, Ahmed Idris Nasreddin -
with whom Mr. Abdul Rahman, via his family company, has stated he has
had no dealings since 1984.

Amid this tapestry of multimillion dollar "mistakes" is a small, stray
thread worthy of further attention. The BNP list includes a payment of
$64,900, redirected in 1999 from a U.N.-approved dealer, Jugo Import
Atera, to a Dutch company, BV Chemie Pharmacie. 

Jugo Import - or Yugo Import, as the name appears on the company's Web
site, has been for decades the leading arms exporter of the former
Yugoslavia, now Serbia. Yugo Import's Web site mentions not only that
it specializes in military equipment and transfers of military
technology, but that from 1975-90, more than three-quarters of its
business abroad, or more than $7.5 billion, was done with Iraq -
indicating weapons deals with Saddam's regime prior to sanctions. Why
Yugo Import, during Belgrade's era of rule by U.N.-sanctioned Slobodan
Milosevic, was approved by the United Nations to sell Saddam's
U.N.-sanctioned regime such goods as "anti-snake venom" and
"veterinary supplies" under oil for food is an intriguing question.
Also intriguing is why it has only now emerged, under pressure from
congressional investigators, that Yugo Import proceeds were diverted
to a third party.

The BNP list of third-party payments goes on at great length, and more
details will no doubt emerge. At least half a dozen of the companies
involved in the rerouted payments were among the biggest 40 suppliers
selected by Saddam under oil for food - all doing well over $100
million of business. That alone should sound alarms because Saddam's
regime doled out contracts as favors, overpaying for relief supplies
in order to skim funds by way of kickbacks. At least two of the
U.N.-authorized companies from which payments were redirected,
Al-Riyadh International Flowers and Pacific Inter-Link, showed up in a
2003 Pentagon study as having sold overpriced goods to Saddam -
vegetable ghee overpriced by 28% or more, and palm oil overpriced by 15%.

It is possible all these connections are coincidental, or perhaps
matters of benign convenience or accident, and that investigating them
at leisure is reasonable. But on the chance that any part of this
labyrinth might offer insight into the flow of funds with which Saddam
bought or blackmailed pals who might even today be supporting
terrorists in Iraq who are killing both American troops and Iraqi
civilians, it seems worthwhile for other investigators - maybe even
Mr. Volcker - to follow up quickly on the clues Mr. Rohrabacher and
his colleagues have uncovered. 









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to