This is, unfortunately, a national AND an international problem."denial".

 

Bruce

 

 

 


Terror Denial 

 

By Robert Spencer <http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.asp?ID=1240>

FrontPageMagazine.com | May 6, 2005 

Last Friday, firefighters conducting a routine inspection in a Brooklyn
supermarket found 200 automobile airbags and a room lined with posters of
Osama bin Laden and beheadings in Iraq. An element in the airbags can be
used to make pipe bombs. The owner of the building, according to the New
York Post, served jail time in the late 1970s and early 1980s for arson,
reckless endangerment, weapons possession and conspiracy, according to the
records.[1][1] But officials were definite: this has nothing to do with
terrorism. 

It doesnt? What does it have to do with, then? Was this a local Rotary Club
chapter that decided to sell pipe bombs as a fundraiser and thought that a
few posters of Osama and Iraqi beheadings might liven things up?

Similarly, when explosions killed fifteen people and injured over 100 at an
oil refinery in Texas City, Texas on March 23, 2005, the FBI quickly ruled
out terrorism as a possible cause.[2][2] When a group calling itself Qaeda
al-Jihad and another Islamic group both claimed responsibility, the FBI was
still dismissive.[3][3] But then it came to light that investigators did not
even visit the blast site until eight days after the explosions  and eight
days after they ruled out terrorism as a possibility. One more
independent-minded investigator asked, How do you rule out one possibility
when you don't have any idea what the cause is?[4][4] Still later came the
revelation that initial reports of a single blast were inaccurate: there
were as many as five different explosions at the refinery.[5][5] 

 

It may still be possible that these blasts were accidental, and that five
distinct things went wrong at the refinery to cause five separate explosions
at around the same time. And maybe there was no terrorist involvement. But
how did the FBI know that before even investigating?

 

These are just two examples of a consistent pattern. Last Thursday, federal
authorities revealed the revealed the existence of a three-state scam that
enabled over two thousand illegal immigrants to get drivers licenses.
Michael Garcia, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,
explained: With a valid drivers license, you establish an identity.
Theres no way to identify whether that identity is valid  that youre not
on a terrorist watch list, that youre not a criminal. It gives you a bona
fide. However, although he did not explain how he could be sure that no
jihad terrorists obtained any of the fake licenses, he assured reporters
that this case had no connection to terrorism.

 

Daniel Pipes has recently pointed out that denial and obfuscation of obvious
terror-related cases has been going on for years.[6][6] He enumerates a
number of telling examples, including these: when a Muslim named El Sayyid
Nosair murdered Israeli political activist Meir Kahane in New York City on
November 5, 1990, authorities ascribed the killing not to jihad but to
Nosairs depression.[7][7] On March 1, 1994 on the Brooklyn Bridge, a Muslim
named Rashid Baz started shooting at a van filled with Hasidic boys,
murdering one of them.[8][8] The FBI ascribed the shooting to road
rage.[9][9] On July 4, 2002, at the Los Angeles International Airport
counter of El Al, the Israeli national airline, a Muslim named Hesham
Mohamed Ali Hadayet started shooting at people. He killed two. The FBI
initially said that theres nothing to indicate terrorism. However, after
it came to light that Hadayet may have been involved with Al-Qaeda and was
known for his hatred for Israel, the FBI finally did classify this as a
terrorist act.[10][10] 

 

The Beltway Snipers, who were linked to eighteen shootings and ten murders
in the Washington, D.C. area in October 2002, were two converts to Islam:
John Muhammad and Lee Malvo. Before they were caught investigators ascribed
the crimes to an angry white man; the perpetrators turned out to be two
black men. After they were caught, the media persistently referred to John
Muhammad as John Williams, ignoring his conversion to Islam and consequent
name change. And even after Malvos drawings of Osama bin Laden (whom he
labeled a servant of Allah) and ramblings about jihad were revealed,
authorities continued to downplay the possibility that the shootings had
anything to do with Islam or terrorism.[11][11]

 

On August 6, 2003 in Houston, a Muslim named Mohammed Ali Alayed slashed the
throat of his friend Ariel Sellouk, who was Jewish. Alayed had broken off
his friendship with Sellouk when he began to become more devout in his
Islam. On the night of the murder, he called him and they went out to a bar
together before going back to Alayeds apartment, where Alayed slit
Sellouks throat, nearly beheading him. The two were not seen arguing at the
bar. Although Alayed killed Sellouk after the fashion of jihadist murders in
Iraq and went to a mosque after committing the murder, authorities said
could not find any evidence that Selloukwas killed because of his race or
religion.[12][12] Alayeds defense attorney noted that there was no
evidence to substantiate the hate element.[13][13] 

 

Did officials consider the possibility that Alayeds religious awakening led
to the murder? Did they make any effort to see if Alayed had read and taken
to heart such passages from the Hadith as those in which the Prophet
Muhammad says that the Hour will not be established until you fight with
the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, O
Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him[14][14]? Or the one
that says that when judgment day arrives, Allah will give every Muslim a
Jew or Christian to kill so that the Muslim will not enter into hell
fire?[15][15] Maybe these had nothing at all to do with Alayeds murder of
Sellouk, but it is likely that investigators made no attempt to find out.
Just as they ruled out terror in the Texas refinery explosions before even
visiting the site.

 

Most Americans do not realize that such incidents are taking place on
American soil after 9/11. Are officials trying not to alarm the American
public? Or is this a politically correct strategy born of the success that
canny American Muslim advocacy groups have had in portraying themselves as
victims since 9/11: are officials trying to protect innocent Muslims from
backlash? 

 

Whatever their motivations, they are keeping Americans in the dark about the
true nature and extent of the jihadist terror threat in our own country. The
consequences of that can only be negative.

 

Robert Spencer is the director of  <http://www.jihadwatch.org/> Jihad Watch;
author of Onward
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895261006/ref=ase_robertspen
cer-20/103-1603172-8127010?v=glance&s=books>  Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad
Still Threatens America and the West (Regnery), and Islam
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1893554589/ref=ase_robertspen
cer-20/103-1603172-8127010?v=glance&s=books>  Unveiled: Disturbing Questions
About the Worlds Fastest Growing Faith (Encounter); and editor of the essay
collection The
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1591022495/ref=ase_robertspen
cer-20/103-1603172-8127010?v=glance&s=books%22>  Myth of Islamic Tolerance:
Islamic Law and Non-Muslims (Prometheus). He is working on a new book, The
Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades (forthcoming from
Regnery).




  _____  


  _____  

[1][1] Murray Weiss and Rich Calder, Stash Bagged at Market, New York
Post, April 27, 2005.

[2][2] Pam Easton, Terrorism Ruled Out in Oil Refinery Blast, Associated
Press, March 25, 2005.

[3][3] SITE Institute, Qaeda al-Jihad in the United States Claims
Responsibility For Texas Refinery Bombing, March 25, 2005; Terror cover-up
in Texas City?, WorldNetDaily.com, April 5, 2005.

[4][4] Terror cover-up in Texas City?, WorldNetDaily.com, April 5, 2005.

[5][5] Multiple blasts struck refinery, Associated Press, April 29, 2005.

[6][6] Daniel Pipes, Denying Terrorism, New York Sun, February 8, 2005.

[7][7] Pipes, Denying Terrorism.

[8][8] Uriel Heilman, Murder on the Brooklyn Bridge, Middle East
Quarterly, Summer 2001.

[9][9] Pipes, Denying Terrorism.

[10][10] Daniel Pipes, Terror & Denial, New York Post, July 9, 2002.

[11][11] Michelle Malkin, Lee Malvo, Muslim hatemonger, Townhall.com,
December 10, 2003.

[12][12] Andrew Tilghman, Saudi pleads guilty to killing Jewish friend in
Houston, Houston Chronicle, January 12, 2004.

[13][13] Seamus McGraw, Religious Overtones Color a Murder in Texas,
Forward, January 23, 2004.

[14][14] Sahih Bukhari, vol. 4, book 56, no. 2926. This oft-repeated Hadith
also appears in no. 2925 and Sahih Muslim vol. 4, book 41, nos. 6981-6985. 

[15][15] Mishkat Al-Messabih, vol. 2, no. 5552.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to