Prophet of Decline


By Tunku Varadarajan 
Wall Street Journal, June 23, 2005


NEW YORK -- Oriana Fallaci faces jail. In her mid-70s, stricken with a
cancer that, for the moment, permits only the consumption of liquids -- so
yes, we drank champagne in the course of a three-hour interview -- one of
the most renowned journalists of the modern era has been indicted by a judge
in her native Italy under provisions of the Italian Penal Code which
proscribe the "vilipendio," or "vilification," of "any religion admitted by
the state."


In her case, the religion deemed vilified is Islam, and the vilification was
perpetrated, apparently, in a book she wrote last year -- and which has sold
many more than a million copies all over Europe -- called "The Force of
Reason." Its astringent thesis is that the Old Continent is on the verge of
becoming a dominion of Islam, and that the people of the West have
surrendered themselves fecklessly to the "sons of Allah." So, in a nutshell,
Oriana Fallaci faces up to two years' imprisonment for her beliefs -- which
is one reason why she has chosen to stay put in New York. Let us give thanks
for the First Amendment.

It is a shame, in so many ways, that "vilipend," the latinate word that is
the pinpoint equivalent in English of the Italian offense in question, is
scarcely ever used in the Anglo-American lexicon; for it captures
beautifully the pomposity, as well as the anachronistic outlandishness, of
the law in question. A "vilification," by contrast, sounds so sordid, so
tabloid -- hardly fitting for a grande dame.

"When I was given the news," Ms. Fallaci says of her recent indictment, "I
laughed. Bitterly, of course, but I laughed. No amusement, no surprise,
because the trial is nothing else but a demonstration that everything I've
written is true." An activist judge in Bergamo, in northern Italy, took it
upon himself to admit a complaint against Ms. Fallaci that even the local
prosecutors would not touch. The complainant, one Adel Smith -- who, despite
his name, is Muslim, and an incendiary public provocateur to boot -- has a
history of anti-Fallaci crankiness, and is widely believed to be behind the
publication of a pamphlet, "Islam Punishes Oriana Fallaci," which exhorts
Muslims to "eliminate" her. (Ironically, Mr. Smith, too, faces the peculiar
charge of vilipendio against religion -- Roman Catholicism in his case --
after he described the Catholic Church as "a criminal organization" on
television. Two years ago, he made news in Italy by filing suit for the
removal of crucifixes from the walls of all public-school classrooms, and
also, allegedly, for flinging a crucifix out of the window of a hospital
room where his mother was being treated. "My mother will not die in a room
where there is a crucifix," he said, according to hospital officials.)


Ms. Fallaci speaks in a passionate growl: "Europe is no longer Europe, it is
'Eurabia,' a colony of Islam, where the Islamic invasion does not proceed
only in a physical sense, but also in a mental and cultural sense. Servility
to the invaders has poisoned democracy, with obvious consequences for the
freedom of thought, and for the concept itself of liberty." Such words --
"invaders," "invasion," "colony," "Eurabia" -- are deeply, immensely,
Politically Incorrect; and one is tempted to believe that it is her tone,
her vocabulary, and not necessarily her substance or basic message, that has
attracted the ire of the judge in Bergamo (and has made her so radioactive
in the eyes of Europe's cultural elites).


"Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder," the historian Arnold
Toynbee wrote, and these words could certainly be Ms. Fallaci's. She is in a
black gloom about Europe and its future: "The increased presence of Muslims
in Italy, and in Europe, is directly proportional to our loss of freedom."
There is about her a touch of Oswald Spengler, the German philosopher and
prophet of decline, as well as a flavor of Samuel Huntington and his clash
of civilizations. But above all there is pessimism, pure and unashamed. When
I ask her what "solution" there might be to prevent the European collapse of
which she speaks, Ms. Fallaci flares up like a lit match. "How do you dare
to ask me for a solution? It's like asking Seneca for a solution. You
remember what he did?" She then says "Phwah, phwah," and gestures at
slashing her wrists. "He committed suicide!" Seneca was accused of being
involved in a plot to murder the emperor Nero. Without a trial, he was
ordered by Nero to kill himself. One senses that Ms. Fallaci sees in Islam
the shadow of Nero. "What could Seneca do?" she asks, with a discernible
shudder. "He knew it would end that way -- with the fall of the Roman
Empire. But he could do nothing."


The impending Fall of the West, as she sees it, now torments Ms. Fallaci.
And as much as that Fall, what torments her is the blithe way in which the
West is marching toward its precipice of choice. "Look at the school system
of the West today. Students do not know history! They don't, for Christ's
sake. They don't know who Churchill was! In Italy, they don't even know who
Cavour was!" -- a reference to Count Camillo Benso di Cavour, the
conservative father, with the radical Garibaldi, of Modern Italy. Ms.
Fallaci, rarely reverent, pauses here to reflect on the man, and on the
question of where all the conservatives have gone in Europe. "In the
beginning, I was dismayed, and I asked, how is it possible that we do not
have Cavour . . . just one Cavour, uno? He was a revolutionary, and yes, he
was not of the left. Italy needs a Cavour -- Europe needs a Cavour." Ms.
Fallaci describes herself, too, as "a revolutionary" -- "because I do what
conservatives in Europe don't do, which is that I don't accept to be treated
like a delinquent." She professes to "cry, sometimes, because I'm not 20
years younger, and I'm not healthy. But if I were, I would even sacrifice my
writing to enter politics somehow."


Here she pauses to light a slim black cigarillo, and then to take a sip of
champagne. Its chill makes her grimace, but fortified, she returns to
vehement speech, more clearly evocative of Oswald Spengler than at any time
in our interview. "You cannot survive if you do not know the past. We know
why all the other civilizations have collapsed -- from an excess of welfare,
of richness, and from lack of morality, of spirituality." (She uses
"welfare" here in the sense of wellbeing, so she is talking, really, of
decadence.) "The moment you give up your principles, and your values . . .
the moment you laugh at those principles, and those values, you are dead,
your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period." The force with
which she utters the word "dead" here is startling. I reach for my flute of
champagne, as if for a crutch.

"I feel less alone when I read the books of Ratzinger." I had asked Ms.
Fallaci whether there was any contemporary leader she admired, and Pope
Benedict XVI was evidently a man in whom she reposed some trust. "I am an
atheist, and if an atheist and a pope think the same things, there must be
something true. It's that simple! There must be some human truth here that
is beyond religion."


Ms. Fallaci, who made her name by interviewing numerous statesmen (and not a
few tyrants), believes that ours is "an age without leaders. We stopped
having leaders at the end of the 20th century." Of George Bush, she will
concede only that he has "vigor," and that he is "obstinate" (in her book a
compliment) and "gutsy . . . Nobody obliged him to do anything about Terri
Schiavo, or to take a stand on stem cells. But he did."


But it is "Ratzinger" (as she insists on calling the pope) who is her soul
mate. John Paul II -- "Wojtyla" -- was a "warrior, who did more to end the
Soviet Union than even America," but she will not forgive him for his
"weakness toward the Islamic world. Why, why was he so weak?"


The scant hopes that she has for the West she rests on his successor. As a
cardinal, Pope Benedict XVI wrote frequently on the European (and the
Western) condition. Last year, he wrote an essay titled "If Europe Hates
Itself," from which Ms. Fallaci reads this to me: "The West reveals . . . a
hatred of itself, which is strange and can only be considered pathological;
the West . . . no longer loves itself; in its own history, it now sees only
what is deplorable and destructive, while it is no longer able to perceive
what is great and pure."  Ecco!" she says. A man after her own heart.
"Ecco!" But I cannot be certain whether I see triumph in her eyes, or pain.


As for the vilipendio against Islam, she refuses to attend the trial in
Bergamo, set for June 2006. "I don't even know if I will be around next
year. My cancers are so bad that I think I've arrived at the end of the
road. What a pity. I would like to live not only because I love life so
much, but because I'd like to see the result of the trial. I do think I will
be found guilty."

At this point she laughs. Bitterly, of course, but she laughs.


#          #          #


Mr. Varadarajan is the editorial features editor of The Wall Street Journal.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
Brooks Isoldi, editor

  Post message:
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to