http://www.spectator.co.uk/article_pfv.php?id=6340
Un-American activities Mark Steyn New Hampshire In the summer of 2002 I wrote in this space that the President had failed to seize the moment: George W. Bush had a rare opportunity after September 11. He could have attempted to reverse the most poisonous tide in the Western world: the gloopy multiculturalism that insists all cultures are equally valid, even as theyre trying to kill us. He could have argued that Western self-loathing is a psychosis we can no longer afford. Oh, well. Three years on, it seems even clearer that this was Bushs biggest immediate lapse in an otherwise clear-sighted understanding of what was at stake. The post-9/11 world is not primarily a war between civilisations the West vs Islam but a war within one civilisation: ours. Its a long existential struggle between those who believe that Western values or, to be more precise, the values of the English-speaking world are one of the great blessings of this world and those counter-tribalists (in John OSullivans phrase) who believe those values are the source of most of the worlds ills. The latter are a relatively small group but their numbers are bolstered by legions so immersed in the sappy therapeutic culture of the age that theyve been persuaded that the best way to celebrate diversity is to abase oneself before moral relativism and non-judgmentalism. The Islamists are merely the lucky beneficiaries of this syndrome. Its hard to fight a war in a culture that recoils from the very concept of an opposing side: there are no enemies, just friends whose grievances we havent yet accommodated. For a few brief weeks after 9/11, back when Americans were celebrating the heroism of the brave passengers who rose up against their hijackers on Flight 93, it seemed as if the last words of Tod Beamer Lets roll! might indeed roll back the enervated multiculti squishiness of the age. In those days Michael Moore was an irrelevant fringe figure, a well-known crank, regarded with considerable distaste even on the Left, as Jacob Weisberg, editor of Slate, assured us. Three years later, garlanded with Oscars and Palmes dOr, Michael Moore was sitting alongside Jimmy Carter in the presidential box at the Democratic Convention. The mainstreaming of well-known cranks like Moore is one reason the Dems have become such reliable losers every other November. Reacting to Karl Roves recent assault on American liberals as unreliable on national security and war, big-time Democrats huffed indignantly that this was an outrage given their support over the Afghan campaign. OK, but even taking that at face value it was three and a half years ago: what have you done since? Bitched about Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and whined that Jacques Chirac doesnt want to be friends any more. These days, heavyweight Dems lumber on to the Senate floor to do Noam Chomsky impressions: the other day it was Dick Durbin of Illinois comparing the US military at Guantanamo with Nazis and the Khmer Rouge. But the co-option of Durbin, and Ted Kennedy and Howard Dean et al. (as in Gore) is small potatoes compared with the counter-tribalist Lefts most audacious appropriation yet. While the Bush administration and most of the rest of the country were focused on Afghanistan and Iraq, Ground Zero in New York got snaffled up for something called the World Trade Center Memorial. An unexceptional name that would lead you to expect ...what? The names of the dead? A tribute to the courageous firemen who died in their hundreds heading up the stairwells and into the flames? A recreation of the iconic image of the three rescue workers raising the flag and evoking Iwo Jima? But somehow the World Trade Center Memorial Cultural Complex has wound up mostly in the hands of something called the International Freedom Center, on whom millions of taxpayers dollars have been lavished in return for a display that will place the events that took place on that ground in the broader context of Native American genocide, black lynchings, Pinochet, the Holocaust, not to mention Gitmo and Abu Ghraib. Most Americans were unaware of this amazing heist until Debra Burlingame, a member of the board of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation and sister of the pilot of one of the hijacked planes, revealed the extent of the subversion. The leading figures in the International Freedom Center are: Tom Bernstein, a Hollywood financier whose organisation Human Rights First recently filed a lawsuit against Don Rumsfeld on behalf of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan. Michael Posner, who heads the Stop Torture Now campaign directed exclusively at the US military. Eric Foner, the Columbia University professor who shortly after 9/11 wrote, Im not sure which is more frightening: the horror that engulfed New York City or the apocalyptic rhetoric emanating daily from the White House. and, of course, George Soros, the billionaire sterling-destabiliser who was one of the first to compare Bush to the Nazis. According to the International Freedom Center, the cultural centre will nurture a global conversation on freedom in our world today. In other words, Ground Zero is going to be turned into what the columnist Michelle Malkin calls the Ultimate Guilt Complex. Thus, early plans for a mural showing an Iraqi going to the polls were ditched in favour of a picture of Martin Luther King. Nothing wrong with folks learning about civil rights and Pinochets victims, but not at the site of the bloodiest attack on the American mainland. I never cared for the Twin Towers, which were never anything more than a couple of oversized slabs of Seventies tat. But once the Islamonutters had taken them down and the various internationally acclaimed architects began submitting designs of ever more limpid tastefulness, I decided Donald Trump had it right: rebuild the ugly muthas but make em taller, and stick a giant extended middle finger on the top of each one, or maybe pose that Saddam statue hanging sideways off the roof so hes being toppled in perpetuity. The latest hastily revised design for the new Freedom Tower eliminates the life-affirming vertical gardens and other milquetoast features proposed by the architect Daniel Libeskind but its still a feeble un-American wimp-out. Nonetheless, even though I was resigned to architectural disappointment, it never occurred to me that the internal display would be so easily hijacked. Inevitably, once Miss Burlingame went public with her concerns, the New York Times and co. decided the controversy was all about the right of brave artists to challenge preconceptions: it would be a terrible thing, declared the Times, if the vital impulses represented by the arts are handcuffed in the name of freedom.... Do they have a software programme that generates that kind of portentous boilerplate or does some poor editorialist have to try to stay awake while typing it in by hand? Who cares about the vital impulses of the arts? When did Ground Zero become just another outpost for lame provocations by publicly funded artists? If thats your bag, theres a zillion places in town. Needless to say, thats not how the alleged artists feel, their general line boiling down to: but enough about the 3,000 dead lets talk about me. In some perverse way, I half hope the Soros crowd and the Stop Rumsfeld Now set get away with it. It would in a sense be a very fitting monument to the indestructibility of the banal tropes of the Left. And it would remind outraged visitors to Ground Zero that, while this kind of thinking doesnt command much support among the American people, it has a hammerlock on the heights of our culture. Given its grip on the academy, the media, the Congregational and Episcopal Churches, the arts and Hollywood, why wouldnt it also effortlessly consume the 9/11 site and transform a straightforward patriotic memorial into just another lesson in how flawed we are? A warts and all representation thats all warts. The only surprise is that they didnt invite the Wahabis to build a memorial madrasa on the site, in the interests of multicultural outreach. It feels like summer. Summer 2001, that is. Then, as now, Africa was in the news. There was a big UN conference on racism in Durban the week before 11 September. Remember that? They demanded America pay reparations for the Rwandan genocide. And Robert Mugabe was cheered to the rafters when he called on the United States and the United Kingdom to apologise unreservedly for their crimes against humanity. Four years later, plus ça change. The only difference is that His Homophobic Excellency was too busy razing mosques and destroying crops back home to attend Live 8, so they had to get Pink Floyd and George Michael instead. In terms of the reviews, thats not a bad move. But the message stayed pretty much the same: Africa is our fault, and we need to pay up for it. For, as Sir Bob Geldof put it, Something must be done, even if it doesnt work. No wonder that bloke from Coldplay whos married to Gwyneth described Live 8 as the greatest thing thats ever been organised probably in the history of the world. At first, they said half the population of the entire planet watched. Then they revised it down to two billion. Hmm. In my small corner of the planet, I couldnt find a single neighbour who caught the concerts. But I assumed that was just our hard-hearted Granite State parochialism. In Britain 10 million people watched Live 8, which works out at about half of what a Morecambe and Wise Christmas show would have pulled, but isnt bad in these deregulated times. They had a big hit and 83 per cent of the population didnt need to be involved. For purposes of comparison, the 4 June episode of Casualty on BBC1 got 7.83 million viewers or, if you want a musical point of reference, Strictly Dance Fever with Graham Norton got 6.34 million viewers. In other words, you put together a unique once-in-a-lifetime bill with Sir Paul McCartney, Sir Elton John, Her Grace the Madonna of that Ilk, the Who and the first performance by Pink Floyd since the Second Crusades, and together they pull an audience that is 50 per cent bigger than the anonymous house orchestra on a BBC talent show. The only difference is that Strictly Dance Fever didnt generate front-page news around the world from Vancouver to New York to London to Sydney the way Live 8 did. Those session musicians in that BBC house band cant command private audiences of G8 heads of government the way Sir Bob and Lord Bono of the Reeks can. The every pronouncement of Graham Nortons second trombonist is not relayed to the world as avidly as each geopolitical morsel that falls from the pink tongue of Pink Floyds Dave Gilmour. So Id say David Daviss line that the Tories must embrace the spirit of Live 8 is a lot of hooey. By the time you read this, it may well have induced the G8 chaps to make some forlorn genuflection in their direction, but the spirit of Live 8 is already on the wane. Because theres no such thing. At the French concert at Versailles 16-year-old Hugo Viollier sat on the grass drinking beer with friends and told Reuters, I came because its free and not very far from where I live. I didnt even know it had anything to do with Africa until you told me but thats a good thing. At the Canadian concert in Barrie, Ontario, Marty Gradwell said he was there to rock out and enjoy the start of a warm summer. Asked by the Globe and Mail what cause the worldwide concerts were raising awareness of, he gamely took a shot: For Aids in Afghanistan, is it? Close enough. Maybe when Marty and Hugo have finished drinking beer and rocking out, the stirring message of the day will linger like a haunting refrain. But Ill wait and see how effective the trickle-down populism is. When Bob Geldof chided G8 leaders with his post-gig triumphalism Now feel the force of the gale thats hit you that light breeze was mainly one mans hot air. Live 8 is elites speaking to elites knighted rockers to heads of government because thats the level at which celebrities are comfortable interacting. Indeed, in its malign progress from leftist activists to impressionable celebrities to doting media to squishy politicians, its a perfect paradigm of how the most comprehensively failed Sixties nostrums get continuously recycled as revolutionary popular idealism. When Cromwell instructed his portraitist to paint him warts and all, he meant both halves of that equation. To teach the warts alone is morbid and unhealthy. Thats why I argued that, in that immediate post-9/11 period, Bush should have expended some of his political capital and spectacular approval ratings in a conscious assault on the most debilitating aspects of our culture. Alas, thats not his style. So in different ways, at Ground Zero and in Hyde Park, weve taken four years to come back to where we were on 10 September 2001. -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
