What is highlighted is the need for intelligence services to get off their
butts and start taking active measures against the terrorists…simple
“information collection” is not going to stop the attacks.  Counter-attacks
will.  Pre-emptive attacks will.

 

Bruce

 

Spies vs. Spies 
The execution of Egypt’s top envoy highlights the intelligence challenges
facing governments whose citizens are kidnapped in Iraq

WEB EXCLUSIVE

By Melinda Liu

Newsweek

Updated: 6:34 p.m. ET July 8, 2005

 

July 8 - The grim news broke Thursday, just hours after multiple explosions
rocked London. The insurgent group Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia—posting a picture
of Egypt’s blindfolded ambassador-designate to Iraq on a militant Islamic
Web site—announced that it had executed the kidnapped envoy. Ihab al-Sherif
had been abducted in a brazen assault in Baghdad last Saturday,
pistol-whipped by gunmen who shouted that he was "an American spy," stuffed
him into the trunk of a car and sped off.

Al-Sherif’s reported death came just two days after two other failed kidnap
attempts on senior Muslim diplomats. In Baghdad's upscale Mansur district,
gunmen fired upon a diplomatic convoy carrying Pakistani Ambassador Mohammad
Younis Khan; he escaped unharmed. Several hours earlier, also in Mansur,
Bahrain's top envoy, Hassam Malallah al-Ansari, was shot and wounded in the
hand. 

Aside from the human tragedy, this week’s assaults underscore the
intelligence challenges that foreign governments face when a high-profile
citizen is abducted or attacked. Of the 200-plus foreigners kidnapped in
Iraq, at least 33 have been killed in captivity. Some have been beheaded as
their captors made gruesome videotapes that were later released to the
media. Such images have great potential to inflame antiwar and
antigovernment sentiment back home. Speed is of the essence, and a
government often mobilizes intelligence officials in full crisis mode to try
to free an abducted national.

U.S. officials nearly always offer liaison and support—as Washington did to
Cairo this week—but there is a catch. The involvement of heavily armed U.S.
troops could provoke extremists to greater anger and violence—and at the
very least could complicate delicate hostage negotiations.

Some foreign officials hit up against another problem when they contemplate
consulting with U.S. authorities. Governments that agree to pay money in
return for a hostage contradict the firm no-ransom policy of America,
Britain and Australia. For this and other reasons, some governments decide
to keep much of their intelligence activities secret, even from allies. The
lack of coordination with U.S. authorities, for example, played a role in
this year's shooting death of Italian intelligence officer Nicola Calipari
as he rode in a car with
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7818807/site/newsweek/> newly released hostage
Giuliana Sgrena. Calipari had just successfully secured Sgrena's release,
and they were heading toward Baghdad airport for a flight back to Italy.
Perceiving their approaching vehicle as a threat, U.S. soldiers at a
checkpoint opened fire,
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7139834/site/newsweek/> killing Calipari and
wounding Sgrena.  

Immediately afterward, Sgrena hinted that the troops had fired upon her
vehicle intentionally because her government did not agree with the U.S.
stand against ransom payments. Later she declined to discuss the topic of
ransoms.

Sometimes a hostage gets lucky, like Australian
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8234978/site/newsweek/> Douglas Wood, who was
freed in mid-June by Iraqi troops on a routine search operation. Sometimes
luck runs out. Al-Sherif was thought to have had a fair chance at being
released since, almost exactly a year ago, Egypt's third-ranking diplomat in
Iraq was abducted by Islamic militants and released days later, after the
Egyptian government said it had no plans to deploy soldiers to Iraq.

And sometimes a government has to dig deep into its bag of covert resources
to deal with a hostage crisis. Iraq's shadowy kidnapping industry is a
backdrop for some of the most exotic intelligence ops in Iraq. One of the
most successful: a campaign by the Romanian government to free three
journalists kidnapped in late March. 

The story sounds like something out of a John Le Carré novel. The Romanian
journalists had been in Iraq just five days when they were abducted.
Initially the kidnappers made no demands; later they threatened to kill the
hostages unless Romania pulled out its 860 troops deployed in Iraq.
Ultimately, the hostages were released May 22, after which Romanian
President Traian Basescu publicly thanked his country's secret services,
saying that the hostage release was "100 percent a Romanian operation."

The episode was especially unusual in that someone actually got detained—in
Bucharest—on kidnapping charges. A wealthy Syrian-born businessman, Omar
Hayssam, has been charged with orchestrating the abductions. Romanian
prosecutors claim Hayssam initially tried to engineer a "fake" kidnapping so
that he could leave the country in possession of a large sum of money,
purportedly destined as ransom. (Earlier, he'd been barred from leaving the
country pending tax evasion and money-laundering probes. But things started
to go wrong when Iraqi insurgents got wind of the original abduction
plan—and decided to kidnap the journalists themselves, the Romanian
president has charged. Hayssam has denied any wrongdoing and said he was
only trying to help.) 

Actually, the plot began to thicken decades ago. The Romanian newspaper
Averea quoted an intelligence agent saying that President Basescu had
appealed to a dormant communist-era spy network to help free the Romanian
captives. The network had been cultivated by the then-feared secret
intelligence services of dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, who was executed in
1989.

During the Ceausescu era, as many as half a million Arab students flocked to
study in Romania, especially Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis and Libyans.
Spymasters of the notorious Securitate intelligence services reportedly
recruited "assets" among these students. The unnamed Romanian spy was quoted
as saying Basescu enlisted espionage agents who'd served as communist-era
recruiters, and asked them to look up their erstwhile Arab protégés to find
a way to open hostage negotiations with the kidnappers.  "The moles were
'reactivated' by President Basescu during the hostage crisis. From that
moment on, information started flowing our way," Averea quoted the agent as
saying. 

The accuracy of the agent’s claims are hard to assess. One of Ceausescu's
former spymasters, Nicolae Plesita, did weigh in to say the revelations were
true. Local media quoted him saying the Romanian hostage releases were
assisted "by an old spy who was set to work again."  But then, Plesita has
reasons to burnish the name of the once-ruthless Securitate. Plesita had
headed the Securitate's Foreign Intelligence Service, and military
prosecutors are now investigating him for alleged ties to the notorious
terrorist Carlos the Jackal. (Plesita is accused of hiring Carlos to carry
out a bomb attack on the Munich offices of Radio Free Europe in February
1981). 

The Romanian president has refused to divulge details of precisely how the
spies helped in the hostages' release. However, in June Basescu acknowledged
that the hostage crisis showed that the Arab connection should be stressed
once again. "Life has proved to us that it's good to restart and consolidate
ties with Arab countries," Basescu said.

In all, the three Romanian journalists spent 55 days in captivity. At one
point they found themselves detained in a cramped and sweaty cellar
alongside kidnapped French journalist Florence Aubenas and her Iraqi
interpreter, who had  been abducted months earlier.  A high-level Romanian
source, who requested anonymity because his job bars him from talking to
media about such topics, told NEWSWEEK that Bucharest authorities passed on
key information about the hostages to their French counterparts.

He said Romanian negotiators were able to secure the release of their
citizens more quickly, because they had a better understanding of the Iraqi
psyche and the kidnappers' deeply entrenched sense of humiliation at the
hands of foreigners. Also, the Romanians were less prickly than the French
when it came to tolerating abusive language used by Iraqi negotiators, he
said, recalling that one epithet used by the Iraqi intermediaries was "that
dog Basescu." 

The Romanian-French connection came to light only after Aubenas, who works
for the newspaper Liberation, was released June 14 after five months in
captivity. At that point Romanian Prime Minister Calin Tariceanu confirmed
in an interview with French TV that Romanian spies had helped free Aubenas
and her translator. "There was a close collaboration between the Romanian
and French secret services with a view to freeing the French journalist," he
said.

Despite calls for the French government to explain exactly how the releases
were achieved, Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy refused to divulge
details. The reason for continued secrecy, he claimed at the time, was
because "There are still some hostages in the place of detention [where
Florence had been held] a few hours ago." 

Will this exotic spy-versus-spy tale ever be revealed? For his part, Basescu
has said that full disclosure about the hostage releases might take half a
century to emerge.Meanwhile, the killing of Egypt’s Al-Sherif has served as
a setback to Baghdad's efforts to enhance its diplomatic ties, especially
with Arab governments that have been reluctant to send ambassadors to
Baghdad because their citizens opposed the U.S.-led war against Saddam
Hussein. 

The new Iraqi government undoubtedly hoped Egypt’s decision—announced last
month—to upgrade its mission in the Iraqi capital and give its top envoy
full ambassadorial status could have been a first step in turning the
diplomatic tide. Instead, the online statement purporting to be from the
group Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia said its members had killed al-Sherif, who
would have been Baghdad's first Arab ambassador since Hussein’s ouster, in
retaliation for Egypt’s decision “to obey the Crusaders … in sending the
first ambassador” to Baghdad. The group, which is led by Abu Mussab
al-Zarqawi, also warned it would be targeting other envoys in Iraq. The
authenticity of such online statements could not be immediately verified,
but they’re unlikely to encourage Arab governments to send their
representatives to Baghdad.  

With Michelle Kelso in Bucharest 

© 2005 Newsweek, Inc.

 

© 2005 MSNBC.com

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8514522/site/newsweek/

FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to