http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0711/p07s02-woeu.html

from the July 11, 2005 edition 


Overshadowed by terrorism, G-8 summit still secures debt relief

By Mark Rice-Oxley | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor 
LONDON – It was meant to be the summit that would take on poverty 
and climate change. But ultimately it was another global threat - 
terrorism - which overshadowed last week's summit of the world's 
richest eight nations. 

G-8 leaders signed a series of accords and initiatives on the 
environment, and on aid and debt relief for poor countries.
                

But it was the London bombings which dominated the summit of leaders 
from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, and the 
United States, briefly interrupting discussions and distracting 
attention from the final outcome.

Summit host and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who wanted 2005 
to be the breakthrough year in the battle against both global 
poverty and global warming, said that the meeting at Gleneagles 
proved that the G-8 was seeking to spread hope and save life, while 
terrorists did the opposite.

"All of this does not change the world tomorrow," he said. "It is a 
beginning not an end. But it has a pride and a hope and a humanity 
at its heart that can lift the shadow of terrorism and light the way 
to a better future."

But aid and development experts said the announced measures fell 
well short of the quantum leap needed to spring poor countries into 
a new trajectory out of poverty, disease, and decline. They said the 
measures would not enable the rich world to match up to the UN's 
Millennium Development Goals, a pact made five years ago to halve 
world poverty by 2015.
The following catalog the broad agreements reached and analysts' 
verdicts:

Debt relief

The G8 confirmed its plan, unveiled last month, to write off the 
debts owed by 18 poor countries to multilateral lenders like the 
World Bank and IMF. No new initiatives were disclosed. Debt 
campaigners welcomed the accords, but said more than 40 additional 
countries also urgently needed debt relief.

Aid
Mr. Blair did manage to get his peers to double development aid - to 
some $50 billion by 2010. He admitted this was just the beginning, 
and would not immediately eradicate poverty in Africa. Some 
campaigners, notably the ubiquitous Bob Geldof were impressed. But 
others noted that some of the increase has already been announced 
under separate deals, and were dismayed at the five year delay until 
the magical figure is reached.

"The people have roared but the G-8 has whispered," said Kumi Naidoo 
of the pressure group Global Call to Action Against Poverty. "The 
promise to deliver by 2010 is like waiting five years before 
responding to the tsunami."

ActionAid fretted that less than half of the increase was actually 
new money.
The G-8 also promised to strive for universal access to treatments 
for deadly diseases like HIV/Aids and malaria.
U2 singer Bono commented: "600,000 Africans, mostly children, will 
remember this G-8 summit at Gleneagles because they will be around 
to remember this summit, and they wouldn't have otherwise."
The G-8 also earmarked $3 billion to help the Palestinian Authority 
take control of Gaza when Israel withdraws later this summer.

Trade

Though unfair trade rules are often cited as the biggest barrier to 
growth and sustainability for poor countries, the G-8 came up with 
little new here, apart from promises to establish a "credible end 
date" for a trade agreement to eliminate export subsidies.

"On trade they have come up with nothing," says Peter Hardstaff, 
head of policy for the World Development Movement, an independent 
international anti-poverty and trade justice movement.
"They have sent a message to the rest of the world that thy have no 
intention of taking unilateral action to stop damaging trade 
policies, and they'll make sure they get something in return from 
poor countries. This is asking not what we can do for the poor but 
what the poor can do for us."

Climate change

Stark differences between the US, which has not signed the Kyoto 
protocol, and the other countries which have, were clear. There were 
calls for more energy efficiency, increasing use of renewables, and 
support for research and development into new energy technologies. 
There was also a commitment to a new series of talks on climate 
change that would bring big polluters America and China into the 
fold, and Blair called for a conference on Nov. 1 to assess progress.
"The G-8 have failed to deliver a meaningful action plan that will 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions," says Simon Retallack of the 
Institute for Public Policy Research in London.
 
"Without targets and timetables that will lead to binding limits of 
climate-change emissions, you will not achieve the large scale 
deployment of low-carbon technology," he adds.

"There is nothing to drive the deployment of these new technologies. 
There isn't a single dollar sign in those texts."
Summing up the meeting, Blair acknowledged that some would be 
disappointed.

But he said that the nature of international negotiations was about 
incremental steps, not quantum leaps. "It isn't all everyone wanted, 
but it is progress."









--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to