Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of homeland
and national security. I hope you find it interesting. You may link to
it on the web here:

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20050710-080049-9892r

Subscribers to UPI's Security and Terrorism service receive this column
every Monday morning, first thing.

If you have any comments or questions about this piece, need any more
information about UPI products and services, or want to stop receiving
these alerts, please get in touch.

Thank you,

Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tel: 202 898 8081


Security & Terror: The week ahead
By Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor

WASHINGTON, July 11 (UPI) -- The week's homeland and national security
news is likely to be dominated by the bombings last Thursday in London.

White House officials told reporters returning from the G8 summit in
Gleneagles, Scotland, that President Bush would refer to the attacks in
previously scheduled remarks at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Va.,
mid-morning Monday.

Critics of the administration's strategy against terrorism, like former
senior counter-terrorism official Larry Johnson, have called on the
president to seize the chance the tragic events in London present to
resurrect a moment of unprecedented international unity that the world
enjoyed in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but
which the United States "squandered by the decision to invade Iraq."

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the president would place the
attacks in the broader context of the U.S. war on terrorism. "Short term
strategy -- fight the terrorists abroad. Longer-term -- bring freedom
and prosperity to the places that produce terror."

Tuesday, the president's schedule lists a meeting with senators to
discuss the Supreme Court, and the roar of speculation, expectation and
comment about the possibility of a second retirement this week is likely
to drown out most other domestic stories.

This is unfortunate, because this is also the week the Department of
Homeland Security has chosen to unveil its much-vaunted Second Stage
Review. 

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff will roll out the results
of his top-to-bottom business process analysis of the department in
comments to staff Wednesday and then again before the homeland security
committees of both the House and the Senate Thursday.

The review is in serious danger of looking like an anti-climax all
round.

Almost all the possible re-structuring moves have already been chewed
over and debated. As in any reorganization, there will be an opportunity
cost and a great deal will depend on the implementation.

Expectations for Chertoff ran very high on Capitol Hill following his
confirmation, and "the answer to every question so far has been this
review," according to one administration official. "He has set the bar
high and in the end what will he have? A piece of paper."

The official, like many, is skeptical of the suggestion that another
reorganization is a good prescription for an entity whose major
management challenge up to now has been dealing with the consequences of
the last one.

The operational problems will remain, cynics argue, no matter what the
organizational chart looks like.

Those operational challenges at the border will be the focus of two
congressional hearings this week.

Border Patrol chief David Aguilar will testify before the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee Tuesday on tri-lateral North American cooperation on
border issues.

He will be joined by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Edward Kennedy,
D-Mass. -- who will doubtless put in a good word for their immigration
reform bill -- and by Rep. Katherine Harris, R-Fla., of the House
Homeland Security Committee.

Former Canadian and Mexican ministers will also testify.

Sunday evening, the committee Web site was still listing Aguilar's boss,
Acting Undersecretary for Border and Transportation Security Randy
Beardsworth as the invited departmental representative, so we can only
hope senators will not be disappointed with Aguilar.

The Border Patrol chief will also testify before Chairman Harold Rogers,
R-Ky.'s Homeland Security Subcommittee of House Appropriations. He will
be joined by Deputy Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Leonard Kovensky, who will testify about the much-criticized detention
and removal system

Kovensky is filling in for his boss, Michael Garcia, who is leaving to
run the celebrated prosecutor's office for the Southern District of
Manhattan.

The incidence of deputies filling in or acting up is noticeably high in
some of the most operationally-significant parts of the department --
the Transportation Security Administration is still awaiting the
confirmation of Edmond "Skip" Hawley, nominated May 19, as its chief;
and permanent replacements for a slew of senior officials, including
those in charge of border and transportation security and infrastructure
protection, have yet to be named.

United Press International reported that at least one veteran former
counter-terrorist official, Ed Badolato, had been interviewed for the
infrastructure job as long ago as February.

Critics lay part of the blame for the delay at the door of the
much-anticipated Second Stage Review. "How can you pick someone for a
job, let alone ask them to do it. if you don't know yet what the role
is?" asked the administration official, who is not authorized to speak
to the press and does so only on condition of anonymity.

The review is likely to be overshadowed not just by chatter about and
possible news of another Supreme Court retirement but also by the debate
on the Senate floor over the Department of Homeland Security 2006
Appropriations Act, which begins Monday.

In the wake of the London bombings, a long simmering sense that the
administration is preparing to re-fight the last war in its
transportation security strategy is likely to boil over.

The 2006 Transportation Security Administration budget proposal included
$4.7 billion for aviation security and a tiny fraction of that -- $32
million -- for mass transit and other modes of surface transportation.

The Senate Appropriations Committee last month approved a bill that
would actually cut rail security grants by one third, to $100 million.
The House version maintains funding at last year's $150 million level.

At least two senators say they will offer amendments to the
appropriations bill to boost rail security funding -- and with pictures
of the London carnage plentiful and editors on the hunt for a new angle
on the story, they are likely to get a good deal of airtime doing so.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden, D-Del., will put forward an amendment based on a
bill he championed last year to add $1.2 billion for rail security over
the next five years.

Also Monday, the former members of the former Sept. 11 commission hold
the latest in a series of hearing designed to measure the progress the
government has made implementing their reforms.

The topic is congressional reform, the issue upon which the commission's
recommendations have been least successfully implemented by most
measures.

And in a sign of the way in which Department of Homeland Security
officials continue to report to more than one congressional master,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Information Analysis Karen Morr will
testify Wednesday before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

She will discuss terrorist threats and terrorist cells in an open
hearing in the committee's huge hearing room in the Hart building. It
will be interesting to hear her views on the growing evidence that a
"second generation" of Islamic terrorists -- only loosely affiliated
with al-Qaida, unknown to the security services of any nation and in
some case schooled by their participation in the Iraq insurgency -- now
pose the greatest threat to the United States homeland.

This week is likely to prove something of a zero hour for the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Act. House and Senate committees both hear from Treasury
Dept. officials about their report on the law, which concludes it should
not be renewed in its current form.

The report, published at the end of June, found that TRIA, as it is
known, had succeeded in supporting the industry during a transitional
period and stabilizing the private insurance market. But with a more
robust economy, renewal of the law could actually "hinder the further
development of the insurance market by crowding out innovation and
capacity building," Treasury Secretary John Snow said.

Finally, on Thursday, Tom Lockwood, the director of the Office of
National Capitol Region Coordination, will testify before the Senate
homeland security oversight subcommittee on "How Prepared is the
National Capitol Region?"



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to