http://www.presstelegram.com/Stories/0,1413,204~21474~2965765,00.html

Grand Prix of L.B. is a terrorist target?

Official says 'no rhyme or reason' to some of 73 sites picked for 
extra security funding.

By Troy Anderson and
Lisa Friedman 
Staff writers

WASHINGTON — The federal Homeland Security Department's list of 73 
Los Angeles County sites that will get specialized terrorism 
protection left local officials puzzled Thursday because it includes 
some low-priority targets and leaves off such high-profile potential 
targets as universities and hospitals.
A copy of the list of sites that will receive part of $12.9 million 
in extra security funding for the state was obtained by the Los 
Angeles Daily News (a sister paper of the Press-Telegram) and 
reviewed by several officials.
Stadiums, arenas and other entertainment venues made the list, but 
one official questioned why it also included the Toyota Grand Prix 
of Long Beach.
Also, according to the list, the Fallbrook and Valencia malls 
qualified but not the Beverly Center. 
"There is no rhyme or reason to homeland security funding, nor 
homeland security awareness in Los Angeles," said Councilman Jack 
Weiss, a former federal prosecutor deeply involved in security 
issues.
"Why should the Glendale Galleria qualify for something that the 
Beverly Center didn't qualify for? It just looks so scattershot, 
it's hard to believe there are federal standards."
Federal and local officials would not discuss specifics of the list 
of county sites, deemed critical resources by the U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.
Some sites not on the list may be funded through other homeland 
security programs.
The ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, for example, have received 
more than $27 million in security grants from the Transportation 
Security Administration since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
And Los Angeles International Airport has received more than $256 
million to reimburse costs of installing permanent exposives-
detection systems integrated with baggage conveyor systems.
Still, local officials and terrorism experts questioned the 
rationale behind the compilation.
"It certainly wasn't put together with California in mind," said Ed 
Broomfield, homeland security grants program manager for the Los 
Angeles County Office of Emergency Management.
"I wouldn't say that any of them are not targets, but are they the 
most important targets? Quite a few of them are not," he said. "Just 
scrolling down the list, it looks like they only hit about 50 
percent of them right on."
Broomfield said he believes shopping malls and amusement parks could 
be potential targets, but he also questioned placing the Toyota 
Grand Prix of Long Beach on the same list as Universal Studios, 
which police say they once found in an al-Qaida videotape.
"That could be a target, but it's certainly not a top target," 
Broomfield said of the Grand Prix. "Also, the Valencia Town Center 
is not really high up there on the target list."
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, questioned why the Jet Propulsion 
Laboratory or major hospitals didn't make the cut.
"I hope the department has a rational basis," he said. "It does seem 
somewhat arbitrary."
Sites on the list will get grants under the new federal Buffer Zone 
Protection Program, which allots $50,000 per potential terrorist 
target. About $1.3 million went to the city of Los Angeles.
Law enforcement agencies plan to use the money to purchase equipment 
ranging from metal detectors to surveillance cameras.
While the Department of Homeland Security describes the program as 
focused largely on "chemical facilities, dams and nuclear plants," 
the grant application also makes commercial assets like shopping 
malls, arenas and theme parks eligible for funding.
The agency does not in its public documents, however, clarify how 
those potential terrorist targets should be prioritized.
Los Angeles Police Department Cmdr. Mark Leap, the assistant 
commanding officer of the agency's counterterrorism and criminal 
intelligence bureau, would not discuss specific sites but said his 
office was largely responsible for coming up with the list.
Using a new system known as Operation Archangel which analyzes data 
to prioritize potential terrorist targets Leap called the list "a 
living thing."
Leap said he could not speak about why one shopping mall, for 
example, may be on the list and not another. But he noted that the 
list could easily change based on threats and new intelligence.
"It may expand or contract based on a number of factors," he 
said. "To look at a list that was prepared yesterday, it may be out 
of date by this morning."
Both Leap and LAPD's counterterrorism chief, John Miller, 
acknowledged that a larger list of 605 critical sites created in the 
weeks and months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks was 
subjective and often differed inexplicably from jurisdiction to 
jurisdiction.
They described Operation Archangel as a way of narrowing down that 
list based on objective criteria. Some of the criteria, involving 
intelligence, is secret while some, like population levels or the 
level at which a potential attack would hurt a particular economic 
sector, are more obvious.
"It's not an exact science," Cmdr. Mike Grossman of Los Angeles 
County's homeland security office said.
Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Michelle Petrovich said 
criticisms that the list appears random "is not a characterization 
that's in any way accurate."
She said the federal agency relies closely on state and local input.
On the web
Department of Homeland Security 






--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to