http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1530075,00.html

Terrorism on the cheap - and with no paper trail 

Post-bombing calls for a clampdown on money laundering are missing 
the point, reports Conal Walsh 

Sunday July 17, 2005
The Observer 

Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, issued a fresh call last week for 
tighter banking controls to stem the flow of terrorist finance. But 
there is not much evidence that the London bombers were in receipt 
of large funds - or, despite much speculation, that terror groups 
are laundering money through the western banking system. 
Many such suggestions were made in the aftermath of 9/11. Such was 
the supposed financial ingenuity of al-Qaeda that the terrorists 
were even suspected of making a profit by 'shorting' airline and 
insurance stocks ahead of the attack. In time, however, that idea 
was discounted. Similarly, investigations into a handful of suspect 
bank accounts on both sides of the Atlantic yielded little of note. 
Of more apparent substance were suspicions that Islamic charities 
raising money in the Middle East and in the west were actually 
fronts whose funds were diverted for questionable causes. Several 
such organisations were shut down. 
Claims that the terrorists are getting their money from wealthy 
sympathisers in the Middle East also remain credible, as is the idea 
that some of it is moved discreetly through 'hawala' brokers 
operating an informal money transfer system. But intelligence 
agencies have made no great breakthroughs. 
It was the obvious sophistication of al-Qaeda, the international 
recruitment, sheltered training camps and apparently well-organised 
deployment of terror cells that made investigators believe there 
must also be a significant money trail. 
In the past, terror groups such as the Abu Nidal Organisation and 
the IRA were known to have laundered money through western financial 
institutions. And Osama bin Laden himself had a large personal 
fortune, wealthy benefactors and the suspected patronage of several 
governments. 
As organised as many Islamic terrorists have been, however, few have 
required much money to carry out their devastating operations. 'In 
New York, the terrorists' biggest expense was probably flying 
lessons,' says Ken Farrow of the City police. In London, he points 
out, it would have been the military-grade explosive used in all 
four bombs. 
Police are examining the bombers' financial transactions, but it 
seems clear they had no obvious need to move significant amounts of 
money under cover of phoney bank accounts. 
Even before 9/11, Britain's 'know-your-customer' requirements were 
among the most stringent in the world, as were the obligations 
placed on financial institutions to report any suspicious 
transactions to the police or the National Criminal Intelligence 
Services. These made it difficult to launder large amounts of money 
and were designed to detect terrorist activity as well as drug-
running and tax-evasion. But Graham Dillon, a money-laundering 
expert at accountant KPMG, believes they no longer suffice. 
'The old risk indicators no longer work,' says Dillon. 'The crux of 
the problem is that you can perform this kind of terrorism using 
nothing more than an individual's salary. It doesn't take a lot of 
money.' 
Dillon says that governments, police forces and banks need to 
formulate new warning signals that could flag up early signs of 
terrorist activity. This could include reprogramming bank computers 
so that they notice when several people open accounts 
simultaneously, as happened before 9/11; and when a person transfers 
all his savings or assets to a friend or relative, potentially a 
sign of imminent 'martyrdom'. 
Dillon also calls for closer monitoring of payments to companies 
that sell products that could be used to make bombs. 
'Banks urgently need governments to pool what they have learnt from 
the attacks in New York, Madrid and now London, and give us new 
guidelines,' he says. 
But the real danger lies within 
For City firms disrupted by the London bombings, there was a glimmer 
of good news. On the day of the attack, 'disaster management' 
computer systems were put to work, trading floors stayed open, 
markets remained relatively stable and by the end of the day bankers 
were congratulating themselves on their contingency planning. 
Even UBS, which evacuated its Liverpool Street office close to one 
of the blasts, was back in business within hours. It was the first 
time the Square Mile's emergency systems - beefed up in the wake of 
9/11 - had been seriously tested, and was a victory for new 
technology. 
Yet financial institutions are arguably less prepared for attacks by 
hackers and hi-tech fraudsters, who are themselves increasingly 
sophisticated and organised. Figures from the National Hi-Tech Crime 
Unit showed that, in 2003, 83 per cent of companies were targeted by 
hackers using 'worms' or 'trojans' in an attempt to seize control of 
their systems or cause chaos. New and spreading scams are costing 
the biggest firms tens of millions of pounds. 
This culminated last autumn in an audacious attempt by organised 
criminals to steal £220 million from the London offices of Sumitomo, 
the Japanese bank, in a case being investigated by the City of 
London police. The gang appears to have infiltrated Sumitomo's 
computer system and attempted to transfer the money to bank accounts 
around the world. 
Ken Farrow, head of the City police fraud squad, says that Sumitomo 
is the only incident so far in which an attack by external cyber-
criminals has nearly succeeded against a major bank. 'The hackers 
are trying their best, but firms have invested huge sums in 
protecting themselves from outsiders,' he says. 'Increasingly, 
though, the firms are falling victim to insider involvement.' 
Farrow echoes a warning from the Financial Services Authority that 
people in organised crime are applying for jobs at banks in order to 
commit fraud. 'Once you have an infiltrator it's relatively easy,' 
he says. 'You get him to divert money into accounts you've set up 
elsewhere.' 
Acts of identity theft, such as 'phishing', in which online banking 
customers are persuaded to hand over their log-on details by a bogus 
email purporting to be from their bank, are also growing in number. 
Similar details have been stolen from banks' call centres. And 
credit card and ATM fraud has risen to more than £500m a year. 
It is not uncommon for terrorist organisations to do business with 
other forms of organised crime: one theory that police are 
considering about the London bombers, for example, is that they 
obtained their high-quality explosive on an eastern European black 
market. 
But Farrow says there is 'absolutely no suggestion' that terrorists 
would be involved in hi-tech, multi-million-pound attacks on City 
firms. 'Why bother with the effort of hi-tech when you can make all 
the money you need from drug dealing or credit card fraud?'







--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to