"It is this Administration that has put our troops at risk and caused
world-wide anger by fostering policies that promote torture and
refusing to hold those responsible publicly accountable."

"Instead of releasing these records and holding officials accountable
for detainee abuse, the government now seeks to shield itself from
public scrutiny by filing these reasons in secret,"

"At a hearing several weeks ago, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein
said he believed photographs "are the best evidence the public can
have of what occurred" at the prison."

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--detaineerecords0722jul22,0,780913,print.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork

ACLU blames government for new delay of release of photos from Abu
Ghraib prison

 By LARRY NEUMEISTER
Associated Press Writer

July 22, 2005, 7:02 PM EDT

NEW YORK -- The American Civil Liberties Union accused the government
Friday of putting another legal roadblock in the way of its bid to
help the public see photographs and videos stemming from the Iraqi
prisoner abuse scandal.

The ACLU said sealed documents the government filed Friday in U.S.
District Court in Manhattan will be used to argue that dozens of
photographs cannot be released because they would result in a safety
threat to individuals.

"We obviously express skepticism about the latest move on the
government's part to withhold information the public is clearly
entitled to," said Amrit Singh, a staff attorney with the ACLU.

The government raised its new challenge to releasing pictures and
videos from Abu Ghraib prison on the same day it was supposed to show
the exhibits to a judge presiding over the case, the ACLU said.

Sean H. Lane, the government lawyer handling the case, referred
questions to Herbert Haddad, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney David Kelley.

Haddad said the government did file papers in the case under seal, and
he said he could not discuss their contents for that reason.

Singh said the delay by the government would be challenged in court by
the ACLU, which filed a lawsuit in October 2003 seeking information on
the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody and the transfer of
prisoners to countries known to use torture. The ACLU contends that
prisoner abuse is systemic.

"Instead of releasing these records and holding officials accountable
for detainee abuse, the government now seeks to shield itself from
public scrutiny by filing these reasons in secret," Singh said.

At a hearing several weeks ago, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein
said he believed photographs "are the best evidence the public can
have of what occurred" at the prison.

Hellerstein gave the Army a month to prepare to release 144
photographs after he viewed eight of them in his chambers. The
pictures were given to the Army by a military policeman assigned to
Abu Ghraib.

At the time, Lane had argued that releasing pictures, even in redacted
form, would violate Geneva Convention rules on prisoner treatment by
subjecting detainees to additional humiliation or embarrassment.

  URL: http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=18811&c=206

Defense Department Refuses to Turn Over Abuse Photographs; Asks to
File Secret Brief Justifying Refusal
July 22, 2005

NEW YORK - Today, July 22, was the day the government was supposed to
process and redact photographs and videos relating to the abuse and
torture of prisoners held abroad. Raising new arguments on the eve of
its deadline, the United States government refused to release the
materials to the public. The photographs and videos were to be
processed for eventual release as a result of a lawsuit filed by the
American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NEW YORK -- Today was the day the government was supposed to process
and redact photographs and videos relating to the abuse and torture of
prisoners held abroad. Raising new arguments on the eve of its
deadline, the United States government refused to release the
materials to the public. The photographs and videos were to be
processed for eventual release as a result of a lawsuit filed by the
American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations.

"The government is raising newfound reasons for withholding records to
which the public has an undeniable right," said Amrit Singh, a staff
attorney with the ACLU. "Instead of releasing these records and
holding officials accountable for detainee abuse, the government now
seeks to shield itself from public scrutiny by filing these reasons in
secret."

In a letter filed at the eleventh hour, the Department of Defense
claims that photographs and videos of abuse that the court had
previously ordered redacted for future release "could result in harm
to individuals" for reasons that will be set forth in a memorandum and
three declarations that the government will file under seal with the
U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York.

Under the government's proposal, the documents explaining the
government's reasons for withholding the images of abuse will not be
available to the public except in redacted form, and the photographs
and videos may never be made public.

The ACLU has expressed skepticism at what appears to be yet another
attempt by the government to deny the public critical information
about the abuse and torture of prisoners.

The photographs and videos in question were redacted by the Defense
Department in response to a June 1, 2005 court order relating to a
lawsuit filed under the Freedom of Information Act filed by the ACLU,
the Center for Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights,
Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans for Peace. The New York Civil
Liberties Union is co-counsel in the case.

To date, more than 60,000 pages of government documents have been
released in response to the ACLU's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
The ACLU has been posting these documents online at
www.aclu.org/torturefoia.

The FOIA lawsuit is being handled by Lawrence Lustberg and Megan Lewis
of the New Jersey-based law firm Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger &
Vecchione, P.C. Other attorneys in the case are Singh, Jameel Jaffer,
and Judy Rabinovitz of the ACLU; Arthur N. Eisenberg and Beth Haroules
of the NYCLU; and Barbara Olshansky of the Center for Constitutional
Rights. 

http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=imOUU2rj8m&Content=608

Bush Administration Files 11th Hour Papers Blocking the Release of
Darby CD Photos and Video Of Abu Ghraib Torture



Synopsis

On July 22, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)  denounced the
latest efforts of the Bush Administration to block the release of the
Darby photos and videos depicting torture at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison
facility.  On June 2, 2004, CCR, along with the ACLU, Physicians for
Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, and Veterans for Peace filed
papers with the U.S. District Court, charging the Department of
Defense and other government agencies with illegally withholding
records concerning the abuse of detainees in American military
custody. Since then, the organizations have been repeatedly rebuffed
in their efforts to investigate what happened at the prison.

Description and Status
 
In June, the government requested and received an extension from the
judge stating that they needed time in order to redact the faces of
the men, women and children believed to be shown in the photographs
and videos.  They were given until today to produce the images, but at
the eleventh hour filed a motion to oppose the release of the photos
and videos, based on an entirely new argument:  they are now
requesting a 7(F) exemption from disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act to withhold law enforcement-related information in
order to protect the physical safety of individuals. Today's move is
the latest in a series of attempts by the government to keep the
images from being made public and to cover up the torture of detainees
in U.S. custody around the world. 
 
Joseph Darby was the U.S reservist who turned over the photos and
videos to U.S. Army officials and touched off the Abu Ghraib scandal
in April 2004.
 
"This is absolutely unacceptable," stated Michael Ratner, President of
the Center for Constitutional Rights. "We can not move forward from
this scandal until we have a full public accounting and independent
investigation into what happened at Abu Ghraib. The government cannot
continue to hide evidence of torture. The time to release these photos
and videos was a long time ago."
 
Expectations are that the FOIA request will release more than 100
photos and 4 videos, all believed to document deplorable human rights
violations by U.S. military personnel against Iraqi civilians.
 
Barbara Olshansky, Deputy Legal Director of the Center for
Constitutional Rights, stated, "The public must be informed of what is
being done in our name.  It is this Administration that has put our
troops at risk and caused world-wide anger by fostering policies that
promote torture and refusing to hold those responsible publicly
accountable."
 
The Center for Constitutional Rights once more calls for a complete,
transparent independent investigation into the torture and abuse of
detainees that goes all the way up the chain of command and demands
that the Administration apply the Geneva Conventions to every detainee
being held in U.S. custody around the world.
 
This is part of the request under the Freedom of Information Act filed
by the  the Center for Constitutional Rights, the ACLU, Physicians for
Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans for Peace. The
FOIA lawsuit is being handled by Lawrence Lustberg and Megan Lewis of
the New Jersey-based law firm Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger &
Vecchione, P.C.






--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to