http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/05_32/b3946001_mz001.htm?
chan=mz
AUGUST 8, 2005
COVER STORY
The State Of Surveillance
Artificial noses that sniff explosives, cameras that I.D. you by your ears,
chips that analyze the halo of heat you emit. More scrutiny lies ahead
<http://images.businessweek.com/ss/05/07/surveillance/index_01.htm>
Slide Show >>
Lost in the recent London bombings, along with innocent lives, was any
illusion that today's surveillance technology can save us from evildoers.
Britain has 4 million video cameras monitoring streets, parks, and
government buildings, more than any other country. London alone has 500,000
cameras watching for signs of illicit activity. Studying camera footage
helped link the July 7 bombings with four men -- but only after the fact.
The disaster drove home some painful reminders: Fanatics bent on suicide
aren't fazed by cameras. And even if they are known terrorists, most video
surveillance software won't pick them out anyway.
Tomorrow's surveillance technology may be considerably more effective. But
each uptick in protection will typically come at the cost of more intrusion
into the privacy of ordinary people. For now, the public seems to find that
trade-off acceptable, so scientists around the world have intensified
efforts to perfect the art of surveillance, hoping to catch villains before
they strike.
Research laboratories envision tools that could identify and track just
about every person, anywhere -- and sound alarms when the systems encounter
hazardous objects or chemical compounds. Many such ideas seem to leap from
the pages of science fiction: An artificial nose in doorways and corridors
sniffs out faint traces of explosives on someone's hair. Tiny sensors
floating in reservoirs detect a deadly microbe and radio a warning. Smart
cameras ID people at a distance by the way they walk or the shape of their
ears. And a little chemical lab analyzes the sweat, body odor, and skin
flakes in the human thermal plume -- the halo of heat that surrounds each
person.
All of these projects are on a fast track since September 11. Meanwhile,
consumer demand is speeding their development by lowering the cost of the
underlying technologies. Camera phones, nanny cams, and even satellite
photos are commonplace. Biological sensors are flooding into households in
the form of tests for HIV, pregnancy, and diabetes -- some of which can
relay data to a doctor -- and soon there will be far more sensitive
DNA-based tests. Next up are radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags.
They're showing up in stores to help track inventory, and 50 people in the
U.S. have had them planted under their skin to broadcast their ID and
medical data, in case of an emergency.
Together these developments herald a high-tech surveillance society that not
even George Orwell could have imagined -- one in which virtually every
advance brings benefits as well as intrusions. Rapid DNA-based probes, for
example, could help protect us from bioweapons and diagnose diseases, but
they might also reveal far too much about us to health insurers or
prospective employers. The trade-offs are uncomfortable, in part, because
corporations and governments will continue to wield the most advanced
surveillance systems. But ordinary citizens will also gain capabilities to
monitor their surroundings with consumer technologies, from Web cams to Net
search and tracking tools, allowing the watched to observe other watchers.
One great worry is that those who stand out from the norm or express
unpopular views, minorities, the poor, or just the ill-mannered, may get
stomped in new and surprising ways. A recent incident in South Korea shows
how this can play out. A subway commuter posted on the Internet some
cell-phone photos he took of a passenger who had refused to clean up after
her dog relieved itself during the ride. In no time, a vigilante mob on the
Web identified her by her face and the purse she was carrying, and she
became the object of national vilification. "You can move into a
surveillance society one tiny camera at a time," says Deirdre Mulligan,
director of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic at the
University of California at Berkeley.
If terrorism becomes endemic in Europe and America, emerging surveillance
tools may be abused in even more egregious ways. At the same time, the
overhead burdens of a police state, from the dossier-building to the endless
security checkpoints, could impose crippling costs on a free-market economy.
Witness the U.S. clampdown on foreign student visas, which could end up
crimping universities' ability to do advanced research. "We could bankrupt
ourselves, much like the Soviet Union did," notes Kim Taipale, executive
director of Manhattan's Center for Advanced Studies in Science & Technology
Policy.
Experts disagree about when the most visionary tools to thwart terrorist
acts will arrive on the market -- and whether they will deliver on their
promise. Sensors that can detect bombs, radiation, and toxins exist today,
and will be far more sophisticated a decade from now. But strewing them
across every city in America would cost untold billions of dollars.
High-tech electronic eavesdropping on communications networks can be
effective, but only if terrorists use telecom systems. And even with
improvements in cameras, biometric devices such as iris scans, bomb
sniffers, and tracking software, it will be years before they can pick a
terrorist out of a crowd. In short, the march toward a surveillance society
may be inevitable, but no simple cost-benefit equation can assure us that
the sacrifices will be worth it. We'll be debating the point for decades to
come.
Gin or Tequila?
In the quest to sort bad guys from good, scientists are poking ever more
intimately at the core of each person's identity -- right down to the DNA.
One day people's distinctive body odor, breath, or saliva could serve as an
identifier, based on the subtle composite of chemicals that make up a
person's scent or spit. One's smell "is a cocktail of hundreds of
molecules," says Frank V. Bright, a chemistry professor at the University at
Buffalo, the State University of New York. "The question is whether it's a
gin and tonic or a margarita." While some of these sensors perform well in
the lab, he adds, the real world may be different: "The technology is still
in its infancy."
Science today is hard put to identify smells a beagle could nail in an
instant. "We want to show there is a set of underlying odors in people
independent of perfume and what they ate that day," says Gary K. Beauchamp,
director of the Monell Chemical Senses Center, a pioneer of odor prints. But
for Beauchamp, Bright, and others, surveillance is just one objective. The
more immediate goal is to use their biochemical understanding of human odor
to diagnose diseases. Specific chemicals are associated with certain
illnesses -- carbon disulfide with some forms of mental illness, for
instance, and nitric oxide with cancer.
Messengers in your Mouth
In Bright's lab at the University at Buffalo, scientists are creating
super-sensors to pick up myriad molecules released at low concentrations
that constitute human scents, including carbon dioxide, acetone, ethanol,
and sulfur. To capture them, they poke tiny pores into glass -- as many as
10,000 on a chip the width of a pencil eraser -- each tailored to the size
of the molecule. Excited by a laser, the chemicals trapped in the pores emit
different colors, and computers can then analyze the resulting pattern.
Dental researchers are attacking the challenges of identification and
diagnosis from another vantage point -- the mouth. They're studying whether
saliva contains markers for various diseases. If the technology works, it
has additional potential for biometric applications, too. Spit contains many
of the proteins, nucleic acids, and other substances that are found in
blood. While they are present in fainter quantities, they can also be
sampled less intrusively.
Scientists at the University of California at Los Angeles have found that
they can detect in human saliva some 3,000 messenger RNAs, molecules that
carry genetic information within a human cell. These molecules perhaps can
serve as markers for disease, or perhaps for identity, just like DNA. And
they are often easier to detect. About 180 RNA markers are common across all
individuals, but the remainder can differ. "We don't know how constant these
are to the individual on a Monday vs. a Friday, but they could possibly
serve as fingerprints for that individual," says David T. Wong, associate
dean of research at the UCLA School of Dentistry. Last December his team
identified four RNA markers in saliva that may indicate the presence of oral
cancer.
The use of bodily scents and secretions as biometrics presents an intriguing
anti-terrorism weapon. But if the science isn't rock-solid, it can lead to a
nightmare of mistaken identities. That's a problem even with mature
biometrics, such as fingerprints. The fingerprints of Oregon lawyer Brandon
Mayfield were erroneously matched to those of a suspect in the Madrid train
bombing last year. This cast a cloud over the innocent man for weeks.
Biometrics bring a host of other troubles. As they become used more and more
in office access, ATM passwords, passports, and ID cards, their value
increases, and so do efforts to steal or spoof them. And because biometrics
are cloaked in science, matches may acquire an unearned aura of
dependability. Recently, cryptographers in Japan showed that common
fingerprint-based systems can be easily duped using simple molds of melted
Gummi Bear candies. In hopes of precluding such scams, Albuquerque's
Lumidigm Inc. captures images of not only the fingerprint itself but also
the terrain beneath the skin. This includes the swirling patterns of active
capillaries, which help indicate that the finger is alive. Fujitsu Ltd. has
just installed palm scanners that read vein patterns at Mitsubishi bank
ATMs.
Despite the many failings of biometrics, the federal government is
encouraging scientists to fashion them into covert surveillance tools. Face
recognition -- the most obvious way to track people because it's how humans
do it -- is still dogged by problems matching images that may be distorted
by a smile or ill-placed shadow. While scientists work out those glitches,
others are improving iris-based technology for surveillance at a distance.
Though computers can easily find eyes on a face, today's systems can't scan
irises from afar as people rush through a crowd. Sarnoff Corp., a contract
research outfit in Princeton, N.J., hopes to unveil a solution to that later
this year.
Another hope is that certain characteristic movements may be recognizable at
a distance. Taking a page from Monty Python's Ministry of Silly Walks, the
U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the research body credited
with inventing the Internet, funds work on software that could identify
individuals by their strides. Researchers measure the silhouette of the
torso, the swinging of the shoulders and legs, and the time it takes to move
through a single step, says Mark Nixon, a professor in computer vision at
Britain's University of Southampton. Right now, people can still trick the
system by wearing Manolo Blahniks, but there may be signature rhythms that
are harder to disguise. Such "gait recognition" systems may be 5 to 10 five
years from commercialization.
Many people in building security welcome advances in surveillance. In New
York, two-thirds of Class A residential and commercial buildings use some
combination of biometrics and surveillance for access control or checking
time and attendance, says Robert Tucker, CEO of security consulting firm T&M
Protection Resources. Incidents of mistaken identity are rare, he says.
Biometrics can also vindicate an innocent person by establishing a correct
ID, notes Raul J. Fernandez, CEO of Object Video Inc., which makes software
for intelligent camera surveillance: "Highly accurate technology is a friend
to privacy."
The most serious privacy breaches are almost all linked to the proliferation
of fast and inexpensive data processing and storage systems. The worst
problems arise when each bit of information an individual gives up over the
course of a day -- from the E-ZPass scans on the morning commute to the
credit card purchase at Starbucks (SBUX <javascript: void
showTicker('SBUX')> ) to the logging of PC keystrokes at work -- get tied
across various databases to create a detailed dossier of an innocent Joe's
daily activity. "We're a couple generations away from the technology that
makes it possible for a computer to save everything you do," says Bruce
Schneier, chief technology officer at Counterpane Internet Security Inc.
But in info tech, the generations can fly by at superhuman speeds. Ever
since September 11, the U.S. government has been striving through the power
of software to extend its investigatory net over an elusive enemy lurking
among the populace. The idea is to rifle through multiple databases using
algorithms that categorize and rank documents -- ranging from airline
manifests, car rental records, and hotel guest lists to credit, court, and
housing records compiled and sold by private companies such as ChoicePoint.
In this way, machines might recognize relationships among human beings that
humans themselves can miss.
This is just one of many measures that trigger a Big Brother alert. One of
the hot buttons is eavesdropping. An emerging wireless technology called
software-defined radio has the power to make cellular phones compatible with
any network standard, but also opens new frontiers of snooping. The
commercial merits of the technology are self-evident: Say good-bye to dead
zones and lack of interoperability between police and firefighter radios.
But the technology also enables superscanners that can be tuned to pick up
the images on your neighbor's computer. That's possible because all
computers emit stray radiation. With software-defined radio even amateurs
could probably design equipment that could spot somebody porn-surfing in the
next apartment. The technology can also make it easier to turn the cell
phone of a spouse into a bug when it's not in normal use.
Pores and Wrinkles
Advances in many surveillance technologies piggyback on progress in fields
such as wireless signal processing, nanotechnology, and genomics. Even plain
old digital cameras are hotbeds of innovation. The imaging sensors in
consumer cameras have been achieving ever-higher resolutions, while plunging
in price. Because the gadgets are so engaging, crowds end up participating
in surveillance efforts. Witness spectators holding cameras and phones aloft
whenever news breaks -- an act that may aid investigations, or hold police
misbehavior in check. And in biometrics, today's high-res imaging chips "are
an answer to our prayers," says Mohamed Lazzouni, chief technology officer
of Viisage Technology Inc., (VISG <javascript: void showTicker('VISG')> ) a
Billerica (Mass.) maker of face-recognition software. "Now we are able to do
things that we couldn't do three years ago."
Improved picture quality has given a boost to Viisage rival Identix Inc.,
allowing it to add in minute details of the skin to increase the accuracy of
facial recognition. It divides a small area on the face into a 400-block
grid, and then inspects each block for the size of skin pores, wrinkles, and
spots. And using an infrared camera, researchers at A4Vision Inc., a
Sunnyvale (Calif.) startup funded in part by In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture
fund, cooked up a 3D approach. Its system creates a topographical map by
projecting a grid pattern of infrared light onto a face, and matching the
features.
Strides in wireless signal processing are bringing the power of astronomical
instruments to homeland security. Giant radio telescopes today listen to the
faint energy waves emanating from stars billions of light years away. The
first earthbound applications of this electronic wizardry will be airport
scanners that scrutinize passengers' bags. The principle is simple: All
matter gives off so-called background radiation, or millimeter-wave heat,
whether it's a supernova or a switchblade. Brijot Imaging Systems Inc.
recently unveiled a $60,000 system that, Brijot claims, can distinguish
between the heat coming from a human body and that from a metal or plastic
object -- and can pull this off from distances of up to 45 feet. (The
company says its system doesn't capture anatomical details.)
A kindred technology can "see" the molecular composition of matter using
extremely short wavelengths of energy. When a machine made by Picometrix
Inc. shines these terahertz waves on a target, its molecules resonate at a
telltale frequency. One plastic explosive, for instance, vibrates at 800
gigahertz. T-rays pose no radiation hazard because they don't penetrate
human skin. But people being scanned will appear naked on the monitor unless
the system is programmed to cover up private parts.
Airport safety is just a small facet of the security challenge that lies
ahead. Biological and chemical attacks can be ignited in any location, and
spread with alarming speed. "If we could put sensing devices everywhere,
maybe we could stop such attacks," says Thomas Thundat, a senior scientist
at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. But the cost is now
prohibitive.
Elusive Goals
The Holy Grail is a universal sensor, small and cheap enough to scatter in
public places, and smart enough to sniff out anything that comes its way,
without being preprogrammed to find specific molecules. Nobody is close to
that goal yet, but Sandia National Laboratories has designed a lab-on-a-chip
that detects a variety of both chemical and biological agents. It has skinny
microchannels etched in its surface. When a gas or liquid moves through the
tiny pipes, it collides with special material, and how much that slows the
flow betrays the identity of the fluid. Sandia is now developing this
technology to monitor the Contra Costa County (Calif.) water supply.
U.S. Genomics Inc. in Woburn, Mass., claims that it is hot on the heels of a
universal sensor. Its prototype uses particular molecules to tag important
DNA sequences in the genes of lethal pathogens, such as anthrax. Then,
primed with a fluorescent dye, those sequences light up, and a photo
detector compares the pattern of illumination with a library of known
bioagents.
These systems may not be in place in time for the next attack in a Western
country -- let alone in Egypt or Iraq. And if terrorists hit the U.S. again,
the authorities are bound to strike back. Among other things, today's
restraints on racial profiling are likely to crumble. Then what? In the arms
race against suicide bombers, will surveillance technologies prove their
worth?
Some already have. Electronic monitoring has foiled some terrorist plots,
and portals that spot guns and explosives make airports safer.
Unfortunately, many of the most powerful technologies are simply too green.
It may take a decade or more before networks of biochemical sensors are
ready to blanket a whole city. And it could take as long before camera
systems can pick a known face -- terrorist or otherwise -- out of the
throngs. For now, only a combination of electronic monitoring and human
intelligence stands a chance of holding radicals at bay.
In the meantime, scientists who labor on surveillance prototypes are
encouraged that their innovations can bring benefits in health care and food
safety. Over time, people may get smarter about how to live with threats and
make use of technology without undermining their most basic values. They
must. A country that sacrifices its citizens' freedom in the fight to
protect them is no victor.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
<font face=arial size=-1><a
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h089js2/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124125900/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
