http://www.kashmirherald.com/featuredarticle/elst-wahi-part3.html 

Wahi: The Supernatural Basis of Islam

Part III  - Mohammed's reaction to the Quranic trance
Dr. Koenraad ELST

[Editor's Note: Kashmir Herald is honored to have Dr. Koenraad ELST write a
series of articles exclusively for Kashmir Herald. His series of 4 exclusive
articles on "The Supernatural Basis of Islam" will be published exclusively
here on Kashmir Herald.]

The first person to doubt the genuineness of the Quranic “revelations” was
Mohammed himself. This was at the very beginning of his career, when during
his Ramadhaan retreat outside Mecca in AD 610, he had an audio-visual
experience in which he both heard and saw the archangel Gabriel, calling
upon him to “Recite!” (Qarâ’, whence Qur’ân). Upon receiving his first
“revelation”, Mohammed thought he was going mad, or in the parlance of those
days, that he was getting possessed by an evil spirit. 

He didn’t want to spend the rest of his life as Mecca’s village idiot, and
so, preferring death to disgrace, he decided to throw himself from a high
rock: “Now none of God’s creatures was more hateful to me than an ecstatic
poet or a man possessed: I could not even look at them. I thought, Woe is me
poet or possessed – Never shall Quraish [i.e. his fellow tribesmen of the
Quraish tribe] say this of me! I will go to the top of the mountain and
throw myself down that I may kill myself and gain rest.” (Ibn Ishaq’s Sîrat
Rasûl Allah, tra. Alfred Guillaume: The Life of Mohammed, OUP Karachi,
p.106/153) 

The history of Islam could have ended there and then, with Mohammed escaping
the spell of the alleged evil spirit by jumping to his death. But the ghost
himself came to the rescue, as Mohammed testified: “So I went forth to do so
and then, when I was midway on the mountain, I heard a voice from heaven
saying, ‘O Mohammed! Thou art the apostle of God and I am Gabriel.’” (ibid.)


So, the vision repeated itself. We don’t know if that was sufficient to
reassure Mohammed about his sanity, but then another and more decisive
factor intervened to save him: “And I continued standing there, neither
advancing nor turning back, until Khadija sent her messengers in search of
me and they gained the high ground above Mecca and returned to her while I
was standing in the same place; and he [i.e. Gabriel] parted from me and I
from him, returning to my family.” (ibid.) 

It was indeed his wife Khadija who saved him and helped him to accept the
trances as they became a recurring and then a regular feature of his life.
Later on, she supported him when others doubted his prophetic claims: “By
her God lightened the burden of His prophet. He never met with contradiction
and charges of falsehood, which saddened him, but God comforted him when he
went home. She strengthened him, lightened his burden, proclaimed his truth,
and belittled men’s opposition.” (Ishaq/Guillaume:111/155) But more
importantly, she supported and soothed Mohammed in the crucial phase when he
himself entertained the deepest doubts about his own sanity.  

This is how she did it. When Mohammed came home, he told her: “Woe is me
poet or possessed.” But she replied: “I take refuge in God from that, o
Abû’l Qâsim [i.e. “father of Qâsim”, after Mohammed’s first son Qâsim]. God
would not treat you thus since he knows your truthfulness, your great
trustworthiness, your fine character, and your kindness. This cannot be, my
dear. Perhaps you did see something.” And Mohammed answered: “Yes, I did.”
(Ishaq/Guillaume: 106/153)  

Certainly Mohammed had seen something, meaning that his sensory nerves had
indeed produced a visual sensation. But was it a false sensation, or in the
parlance of the day, the impact of ghost-possession? Khadija and her
Christian cousin Waraqa b. Naufal eagerly embraced the idea that Mohammed
had had a genuine vision and had been invested with the mantle of
prophethood, but Mohammed himself still had his doubts. Fortunately, his
loving wife knew a way to decide the matter and convince him of both his
sanity and his new prophetic mission. 

She asked him to notify her when his visitant returned, so that they could
verify whether he really was the archangel Gabriel or an ordinary demon. “So
when Gabriel came to him, as he was wont, the apostle said to Khadija, ‘This
is Gabriel who has just come to me.’ ‘Get up, o son of my uncle’, she said,
‘and sit by my left thigh.’ The apostle did so, and she said, ‘Can you see
him?’ ‘Yes’, he said. She said, ‘Then turn round and sit on my right thigh.’
He did so, and she said, ‘Can you see him?’ When he said that he could, she
asked him to move and sit in her lap. When he had done this, she again asked
if he could see him, and when he said yes,, she disclosed her form and cast
aside her veil while the apostle was sitting in her lap. Then she said, ‘Can
you see him?’ And he replied, ‘No.’ She said, ‘O son of my uncle, rejoice
and be of good heart, by God he is an angel and not a Satan.”
(Ishaq/Guillaume: 107/154) 

In modern language, this account relates how Mohammed’s vision of the
Archangel waned and disappeared. Narrator Ibn Ishaq adds a second tradition
(through Khadija’s daughter Fatima, her son Husayn, his daughter Fatima, her
son Abdullah b. Hasan) which is even more explicit in this regard, viz. that
“she made the apostle of God come inside her shift, and thereupon Gabriel
departed, and she said to the apostle of God, ‘This verily is an angel and
not a satan.’” (ibid.) The underlying assumption appears to be that a
lustful demon, the kind who might take possession of a man’s soul, would
have stayed around to enjoy the sight of Mohammed and Khadija’s interaction;
whereas an angel with his ethos of renunciation would politely withdraw from
the scene. 

After his wife had provided him with this experimental proof of the
genuineness of his meeting with the Archangel, Mohammed was cured of his
doubts. He could now safely embark upon his career as God’s exclusive
spokesman and frequent recipient of Gabriel’s messages, which were written
down by a secretary and later collected into a book, the Qur’ân. Only on one
occasion would the doubt briefly reappear, viz. during the episode of the
“Satanic verses”. 

Frustrated at the unyielding skepticism of his Meccan townsfolk, the Prophet
consciously or subconsciously devised a way to win them over to the
acceptance of his prophetic claims. He would compromise on the central item
in his theology, viz. the falseness of the gods of the Arabian pantheon as
contrasted with the unique reality of Allah alone. Modern apologists
slanderously depict the Meccan heathens as fanatics intolerant of Mohammed’s
innovative cult, but in reality they were always eager for reconciliation.
They were pluralistic or what modern Indians would call “secular”. At a
meeting outside their national shrine, the Ka’ba, they proposed to Mohammed:
“Come let us worship what you worship, and you worship what we worship. You
and we will combine in the matter.” (Ishaq/Guillaume: 165/239) They were
even willing to shed some of their religious practices of those of Mohammed
were to prove superior: “If what you worship is better than what we worship,
we will take a share of it, and if what we worship is better than what you
worship, you can take a share of that.” (ibid.)  

It is at this point that Mohammed received an anti-pluralistic and
anti-compromise “revelation”: “Say, o disbelievers, I do not worship what
you worship, and you do not worship what I worship, and I will not worship
what you have been wont to worship, nor will you worship that which I
worship. To you your religion and to me my religion.” (Q.109) On another
occasion when the Meccans pleaded reconciliation and pluralism, viz. around
the deathbed of Mohammed’s uncle Abû Tâlib (with the words: “Let him have
his religion and we will have ours”), Mohammed likewise refused all
compromise and demanded that they accept his monotheism and his claim to
prophethood, nothing less. (Ishaq/Guillaume:191/278)  

Yet, at one point he did give in to the tempting idea of a quick way to
bring the Meccans into his fold, viz. by accepting the reality and
auspicious role of the three popular goddesses al-Lât, al-Uzzâ and Manât. A
revelation duly arrived from heaven, saying: “Have you thought of al-Lât and
al-Uzzâ and Manât, the third, the other? These are the exalted cranes whose
intercession is approved.” (Ishaq/Guillaume:165/239) The Meccans were
enthusiastic, prostrating along with the Muslims at the mention of the
goddesses in Allah’s company, and word even spread that they had converted
to Islam.  

But then another revelation came down, telling Mohammed that he had been
deceived by Satan, who had smuggled these goddess-revering words into the
channel of the prophet’s wahi or revelatory trance, falsely making it look
like a divine message like all the others Quranic verses. So Allah annulled
the Satanic verses and sent down the verse: “We have not sent a prophet or
apostle before you but when he longed [viz. for acceptance], Satan cast
suggestions into his longing. But God will annul what Satan has suggested.
The God will establish his verses, God being knowing and wise.” (Q.22:51/52;
Ishaq/Guillaume:166/239) Since then, the Quran gives a corrected reading,
this one properly revealed by Gabriel himself: “Have ye seen Lât, and Uzzâ,
and another, the third, Manât? (….) These are nothing but names which ye
have devised, ye and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no
authority.” (Q.53:19-23) 

Mohammed got away with it, the indignation among a few of his followers at
this lapse from orthodoxy remaining brief and inconsequential. But an
objective observer cannot escape facing the question: if the prophet could
be thus deceived by Satan, how could he know on all the other occasions that
he hadn’t been deceived? The only answer the Islamic apologist can come up
with, is the one given in the above narrative: God or Gabriel told Mohammed
which revelation to believe and which one to reject as false. That way, the
only guarantee of revelation is another revelation.  

But at least we can sympathize with Mohammed’s brief pang of conscience when
he realized the deception (he “was bitterly grieved and greatly in fear of
God”, according to Ishaq/Guillaume:166/239). Clearly he tried to be honest
and bring only genuine revelations to his audience. Unfortunately, the
fullness of Mohammed’s critical sense vis-à-vis his revelations had been
abandoned at the very beginning, when safe in Khadija’s lap, he had to
accept the basic genuineness of the process of divine revelation through the
voice and vision of Gabriel. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hel78mq/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124809458/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to