DHS looks at bigger picture for infrastructure protection R&D
<http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/homeland-security/36739-1.html> 
http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/homeland-security/36739-1.html
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
By Alice
<http://www.gcn.com/cgi-bin/udt/im.author.contact.view?client.id=gcndaily2&s
tory.id=36739> Lipowicz 
Contributing Staff Writer
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The Homeland Security Department is taking a cross-sector approach to
protecting the nation's critical infrastructure in a new national R
<http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/theme_home5.jsp> &D plan released this week. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
Rather than examining critical infrastructure by sector, as has
traditionally been done-including agriculture, financial services, energy,
water, health care, etc.-the National Plan for Research and Development in
Support of Critical Infrastructure Protection establishes nine themes that
aim to support all sectors, encompass physical security and cybersecurity
concerns, and be integrated with other national security strategies. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The plan is organized around the themes of: 

*       Detection and sensor systems 

*       Protection and prevention 

*       Entry and access portals 

*       Insider threats 

*       Analysis and decision support systems 

*       Response, recovery and reconstitution 

*       Emerging threats 

*       Advanced architectures and system design, and 

*       Human and social issues. 

The plan, available on the department's Web site, is introduced with a
letter dated April 8, 2005, from secretary Michael Chertoff and John H.
Marburger III, the director of the White House's Office of Science and
Technology Policy. The plan itself is labeled with the date 2004 and
described as a "baseline" for 2005 planning efforts. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The 96-page national R&D plan also is "the first annual version of the
research and development road map" required under Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 7: Critical Infrastructure Identification,
Prioritization and Protection, Chertoff and Marburger wrote. The directive
identified 17 critical infrastructure sectors to be addressed. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The new plan states that it departs from past efforts that have been
primarily organized by sector. It recognizes that many different sectors are
vulnerable to the same threats, and that interconnections between sectors
must be addressed as well. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
"The use of a sector-based plan for examining operational issues is not
appropriate for R&D, as it tends to create artificial repetition and loss of
opportunity for integration," the plan said. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The plan's new approach also includes evaluating interconnections between
sectors and incorporating efforts to reduce vulnerabilities into future
system designs. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
It identifies eight major R&D priorities, including improvements to sensors,
risk modeling and analysis systems, physical security and cybersecurity
systems to detect and deter intrusions, large-scale situational awareness
systems, secure architectures and human-technology interfaces. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
The plan outlines three long-term goals: 

*       A national common operating picture for critical infrastructure 

*       A next-generation computing and communications network with security
"designed-in" rather than added after the fact and 

*       Resilient, self-diagnosing and self-healing physical infrastructure
and cyberinfrastructure systems.

The detailed document catalogues ongoing R&D efforts at federal agencies,
describes the roles of government and private agencies and discusses the
integration of the R&D plan with other national plans. It offers many
research and development goals under each of the nine themes. 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
"There [are] many challenges in developing a document of this scope, which
crosses so many federal agencies and involves such a broad set of topics,"
Chertoff and Marburger wrote. "Developing relationships across agencies and
disciplines is critical to protecting our infrastructure." 
   <http://www.gcn.com/images/clearpixel.gif> 
Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer for Government Computer News' sister
publication, Washington  <http://www.washingtontechnology.com/> Technology.
FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h5l2pso/M=362329.6886306.7839369.3040540/D=groups/S=1705323667:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124814612/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to