_____  

From:  
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:40 AM
To: Bruce Tefft
Subject: Re: Plame's outing exposed more than just a CIA agent


Worse yet, the Post is part of the left-wing cover-up of what was really
involved here.  Nobody mentions her husband's ties to Ramsey Clark's ANSWER.
Nobody talks about Niger uranium captured by the Israelis in Operation
Plumbat.  An, worst of all, the Post does not own up to why it admitted,in
October 2003, that it was at their house on the July 4 weekend BEFORE Wilson
published his NY Times Op-Ed piece.  Why would anybody have been interested
in these people.
 
I keep seeing the media continue its stupid focus on how this investigation
will continue and somebody will still "get" Rove.  They might want to look
elsewhere.  If this goes on,  it's going to blow back on Wilson and his
wife.  Wilson is again whining that his wife is in danger and getting
threats.  Really?  If so, why are these clowns still in the same house and
making no effort to stay out of the limelight?  Nobody told her idiotic butt
to get in photos and talk to Vanity Fair.
 
It's about time that someone opened  up with some things, including the
early, unexplained Washington Post involvement, the ANSWER/Cindy Sheehan
connection, the lack of credentials, the truth about media suppression of
evidence of biotoxins (WMD) in Iraq, and so on.
 
The Post is really becoming a pathetic newspaper.  Last week, their coverage
of the Palestine hotel bombings in Baghdad was totally wrong.  Their
credibility is heavily damaged.
 
 R
 
 
Bruce Tefft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Of course Plame is not even a CIA agent...she's a CIA officer. Nor was she
an undercover operative (if she was, there'd have been an indictment). Nor
was she under the "deepest form of cover"...what nonsense. Nor would the
wife of any US Ambassador work overseas as a covert operator.

Typical poorly researched, uninformed and ignorant reporting from the
Washington Post.

Bruce


http://www.sltrib.com/nationworld/ci_3163362
Article Last Updated: 10/29/2005 01:56:06 AM Plame's outing exposed more
than just a CIA agent By Dafna Linzer The Washington Post

WASHINGTON - More than Valerie Plame's identity was exposed when her name
appeared in a syndicated column in the summer of 2003.

A small Boston company listed as her employer suddenly was shown to be a
bogus CIA front, and her alma mater in Belgium discovered it was a favored
haunt of an American spy. At Langley, officials in the clandestine service
quickly began drawing up a list of contacts and friends, cultivated over
more than a decade, to triage any immediate damage.

There is no indication, according to current and former intelligence
officials, that the most dire of consequences - the risk of anyone's life -
resulted from her outing.
But after Plame's name appeared in Robert Novak's column, the CIA
informed the Justice Department in a simple questionnaire that the damage
was serious enough to warrant an investigation, officials said.

The CIA has not conducted a formal damage assessment, as is routinely
done in cases of espionage and after any legal proceedings have been
exhausted. Friday, after a two-year inquiry into the leak, special
prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald issued a five-count indictment against Vice
President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis ''Scooter'' Libby, for perjury,
obstruction of justice and making false statements during the grand jury
investigation.

Fitzgerald has not charged anyone with breaking a law that protects the
identities of undercover operatives.

Nonetheless, intelligence specialists said the exposure of Plame, who
operated under the deepest form of cover, was a grim reminder of the risks
spies face.

''Cover and tradecraft are the only forms of protection one has and to
have that stripped away because of political scheming is the moral
equivalent to exposing forward deployed military units,'' said Arthur Brown,
who retired in February as the CIA's Asian Division chief and is now a
senior vice president at the consultancy firm Control Risks Group.

''In the case of the military, they can pack up and go elsewhere. In the
case of a serving clandestine officer, it's the end of that officer's
ability to function in that role.''
For Plame, the most serious consequence may be professional.

''It's possible that no damage was done [to national security] but she
can never [work] overseas again,'' said Mark Lowenthal, who retired from a
senior management position at the CIA in March.

Intelligence officials said they would never reveal the true extent of
her contacts to protect the agency and its work.

''You'll never get a straight answer about how valuable she was or how
valuable her sources were,'' said one intelligence official who would speak
only anonymously.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to