_http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=9177_ 
(http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=9177)   

Special Report
A Patriot Acts
By Ben Stein     
Published  12/21/2005 12:10:29 AM
Herewith a few humble questions about Bush, Iraq, 
the  Patriot Act, and domestic surveillance after 9/11.

(1)  Is there  any evidence at all of Americans' rights being 
trampled upon  by the  application of the Patriot Act? Are we any 
less free? Are there   detention camps anywhere? Are opponents of 
Bush afraid to express   themselves? Has anyone had his library card 
confiscated? Where is  all  of the harm that Bush's opponents claim? 
It is just plain  invisible, a  fantasy used to justify their own 
paranoia, isn't it?  It is sort of the  same as the fear that 
Californians and  Manhattanites have of eating  food with "chemicals" 
or "additives" in  it. Pure self-obsessional  thinking about 
imaginary victimhood   to justify their frightened and aggressive 
existence. I am not sure  how  much good the Patriot Act has done, 
but I sure don't see any  harm, and  I don't think anyone can really 
find it. If it's there,  where are the  examples?

(2) Where are all of the wild hurrahs  that should have  greeted the 
recent election in Iraq? It went off  incredibly well, with  all 
major groups participating, with a much  smaller amount of violence  
than was expected. Iraq has gone from  being the most unfree Arab  
country to the most free in a matter of  months, thanks to the vision 
of  George Bush and the heroism of  America's fighting men and women. 
What  has happened is beyond the  hopes of even the greatest 
optimists. But  where are the cheers? Why  are Bush's opponents still 
bashing him over  what is a clear success?  Can it be that hurting 
Bush is more vital to  them than helping a  slave people become free? 
Do they really hate Bush  so much that they  would torpedo freedom 
for a nation of 25 million to  spite Bush? I am  afraid they would 
rather have us lose the war and  humiliate Bush  than win the war and 
have Bush succeed. What if this had  been the  GOP's attitude in 
World War II? Or Vietnam? Or Korea? I wonder  if  there is a name
for what Bush's enemies are doing here.

(3)   Does anyone remember 9/11 any longer? Innocent men and women 
being   burned to death? Temperatures so cruel that grown men and 
women held   hands and leapt to their deaths from the high floors of 
the World  Trade  Center? Children crushed in the lower floors? 
Planeloads of  totally  guiltless men and women and children crashed 
to death? The  worst  terrorist act of all time? In case Chuck 
Schumer forgot, it  was a big  thing in his home state.

Of course Bush would want to  do  everything he could to investigate 
the doings of possible  terrorists in  America and right away, too. 
Of course he would want  to use every  resource, including the NSA. 
And of course, he alerted  key members of  Congress, none of whom 
protested. It was a major, big  time emergency.  Why is it even a 
question of Presidential power? It  was and is a  question of 
protecting the nation. Obviously, if he had  gone public  with it 
right away, it would have alerted the terrorists  to stay off  the 
phone. Maybe he should have gone to a court. Or  maybe he realized  
it was a life and death matter for immediate  action. In any event,  
Bush's main goal has been to save the nation.  He doesn't care about 
an  imperium. He's a quiet, self-effacing guy.  He wanted to save us 
from  more 9/11's. Why doesn't he get some  credit for that?

Earth to  Chuck Schumer and Ted Kennedy: the  enemies are the Al 
Qaeda and  Zarqawi, not Bush. When you cripple the  Commander in 
Chief, you are  doing the bidding, unintentionally, I am  sure, of 
some people who will  not hesitate to cut your heads off.  Keep it in 
mind. Let's get behind  the man who is trying to save us,  and when 
we're behind him, let's not  stab him in the  back.







*
*
*
Rev. Jim Sutter (a/k/a  Groandalf) 

Cleveland, Ohio USA
_http://revjimsutter.blogspot.com_ (http://revjimsutter.blogspot.com/)  
(frequently updated)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/X6CDDD/lzNLAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to