http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=020206A
 
  
The Evidence of Absence   <javascript:;>        
        
  <http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>    
  <http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>    
By Olivier Guitta 02 Feb 2006   
  <http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>    
        
  <http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>    
  <http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>
<http://www.tcsdaily.com/images/clear.gif>      



Since September 11, the European-U.S. partnership in the war on terror has
generally been strong. Even countries vehemently opposed to the war in Iraq,
such as France and Germany, have been cooperating with the US. In fact, John
McLaughlin, the former CIA director, described the relationship between the
CIA and its French counterparts as "one of the best in the world. What they
are willing to contribute is extraordinarily valuable." But if Europe is
really America's ally, how come it does not include Al Qaeda on its list of
terrorist organizations? 

More importantly, why doesn't anyone seem to care? Indeed, it is common
knowledge that the Lebanese Shia terrorist group Hezbollah is not part of
the EU's list. This is a matter of controversy -- Israel wants Hezbollah
included but France has resisted, saying the group fulfills a "social
function." But nowhere is Al Qaeda mentioned.

Following the September 11 attacks, the European Union formulated an
official list of terrorist organizations. Groups such as the Basque
separatist organization ETA, "the external security arms of Hezbollah, Hamas
and Palestinian Islamic Jihad", the real IRA, and the Orange Volunteers were
placed on this list, which obliges member states to seize their assets. But
there was no mention of Al Qaeda and this was three months after the attacks
in New York and Washington DC. The most recent EU list of December 2005
includes now 48 groups (they removed Hezbollah altogether) but still no Al
Qaeda.

As a comparison, Al Qaeda is of course included in the US State Department
list as well as the UK and Australia ones, which seems only natural and
common sense. So, how come the European Union does not consider Al Qaeda a
terrorist entity?

Even though the EU has a different definition of terrorism than the US,
there's no way Al Qaeda could not fit it. Europeans have been historically
lenient towards what they assume to be "freedom fighting" groups or "mostly
social" entities such as Hezbollah. But Al Qaeda cannot be considered either
a freedom fighting group, except if one assumes that they are liberating the
ex Caliphate, or a social group. But still the EU would not have it; Al
Qaeda does not seem to fit its definition of a terrorist group. 

The reason behind this is that Osama Bin Laden's organization is much more a
franchise than an organized entity. Al Qaeda is a loose collection of
different terror networks and therefore cannot be construed as one group per
se. This argument does not hold water because Al Qaeda always had a
centralized command, a clear hierarchy. 

Interestingly enough, this issue has not really been on the table: for
instance the latest available State Department report on Patterns of Global
Terrorism does not mention the EU's omission. While Hamas and Hezbollah's
potential inclusion to the EU list got a lot of coverage and rightly so, Al
Qaeda got none whatsoever. 

Regarding Hamas, the US lobbied with the help of some European allies to
include the Palestinian terrorist group in that list, overcoming France's
refusal. It would be wise for American diplomacy and Congress to tackle this
issue and pressure the European Union to add Al Qaeda to its terrorist list.
Over four years after the bloodiest terrorist attacks in history, it's well
past time.

Olivier Guitta is a Washington DC based foreign affairs consultant.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to