http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2006/02/uk-danger-of-terrorism-deniers.\
html
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2006/02/uk-danger-of-terrorism-deniers\
.html>
Sunday, February 19, 2006

UK - The danger of terrorism deniers
Simon Jenkins
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2088-2047134,00.html> 
illustrates the point perfectly.

Now I am beginning to wonder. Not a day passes without some new sign of
Bin Laden's mesmeric grip on the governments of Britain and America.
His [bin Laden's] deeds lie behind half the world's headlines.
British policy seems obsessed with one word: terrorism. The West is
equivocating, writhing, slithering in precisely the direction most
desired by its enemy. He must be roaring with delight.



Yes, bin Laden, if he's alive, must be "roaring with delight" for not a
day passes in Britain without some sort of Muslim appeasement.
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2005/11/britain-islamization-of-britai\
n.html>  While 40% of Muslims in the UK
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2006/02/uk-40-of-muslims-want-sharia-l\
aw.html>  want us to adopt Islamic law, Britain has begun to do just
that.
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2004/12/uk-adopting-sharia-law.html>

On top of that, the UK and US media are afraid to publish some lame
cartoons about bin Laden's prophet.

Next Jenkins tries a little smoke and mirrors.

On any objective measure, terrorism in the West is a trivial crime.
True, New   York and London saw outrages in 2001 and 2005 respectively.
Both were the outcome of sloppy intelligence. Neither has been repeated,
though of course they may be. Policing has improved and probably averted
other attacks. But incidents genuinely attributable to Al-Qaeda rather
than domestic grievances are comparable to the IRA and pro-Palestinian
campaigns. Vigilance is important but only those with money in security
have an interest in presenting Bin Laden as a cosmic threat.



One is speechless.

Jenkins would like you to forget that while New York and London in 2001
and 2005 have not been repeated, they were in fact repeats of earlier al
Qaeda terrorists attacks.

The WTC was attacked by al Qaeda back on Feb 26, 1993
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center>  - almost 13 years ago
to this date.

And Parliament was the target
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2005/07/britain-iraq-not-cause-of-atta\
cks.html>  of a failed al Qaeda attack on 9/11.

Al Qaeda again tried to attack Parliament last year with Sarin gas.
<http://ussneverdock.blogspot.com/2005/08/britain-sarin-attack-on-parlia\
ment.html>

Did the IRA ever fly planes into buildings killing thousands or did they
ever use WMDs? I don't think so.

Jenkins also wants us to forget about the Embassy bombings and the
attack on the USS Cole and all manner of al Qaeda attacks around the
world since and up to this date.

Jinkins entire piece is nothing more than a parroting of the BBC's "The
Power of Nightmares" which aired just six months before the "myth"
exploded in London and killed over 50 innocent Britons.

One thing is clear, if you listen to people like Jenkins and the BBC you
wind up dead.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to