http://www.answering-islam.org.uk/Muhammad/Enemies/meccan10.html
 
  

Muhammad And The Ten Meccans


As Muhammad grew in power, he began to use violence to obtain his desires.
He ordered the murder of many people. He himself did not go out and commit
the murders; he had men who were willing to do his killing for him. 

This paper deals only with the people Muhammad ordered to be executed
(murdered) after Mecca peacefully surrendered to him. During his lifetime,
he had a number of people murdered, but in this paper we will examine the 10
people he ordered to be killed the day he took Mecca. 

He had marched upon Mecca with an army of 10,000 soldiers. These men were
tough, dedicated Muslims. The Meccan leaders did not think they could defeat
Muhammad's army, so they surrendered to him. Muhammad did not destroy Mecca,
or massacre it's inhabitants, but he remembered some of his personal
enemies, and ordered their execution. As you will see, Muhammad hated some
of these people only because they had mocked him years earlier. 

  _____  

I want to give you some background on the sources I am using. Primarily I am
using three Muslim sources: 

1) the "Hadiths" (Traditions) of Bukhari, Muslim, and Abu Dawud, 

2) the "Sirat Rasul Allah" originally written by Ibn Ishaq and later
rescended by Ibn Hisham, 

3) and the "Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir" written by Ibn Sa'd. 

4) "23 Years - A study of the prophetic career of Muhammad", by Ali Dashti.
Dashti was a Shia Muslim scholar. He was murdered when he was about 85 years
old by the Muslims who took over Iran. Although Dashti doesn't represent the
Sunni branch of Islam, he addressed the issues I am addressing in this
paper, and I've found his scholarship substantial, and well founded. 

No doubt he had access to far more Islamic sources than I have. So, while
Sunni Muslims may object to me quoting a Shia scholar, I find that his
comments regarding the murders at Mecca to be in accordance with the info
I've found in the Hadith, Sirat, and Tabaqat. In any case, his comments are
only frosting on my cake; my points are not based on Dashti's work, his work
is only an embellishment of my case. 

All of the writers of these sources were Muslim, and all of the first 3
works are recoginzed by the Sunni branch of Islam. Of course none of these
are recognized equal to the Qur'an. I would say that the order of authentic
recognizition is 1) Hadiths, 2) Sirat, 3) Tabaqat. 

The Hadith are the traditions, sayings, and actions of Muhammad. Both the
Sirat and Tabaqat are biographies of Muhammad. Both biographies were written
well before the Hadith. Both contain much material corroborated by the
Hadith and Qur'an. 

As I continue to quote these sources, at times I will interject my own
notes, as a short explanation, to keep the context clear for you. My own
notes will be bracketed by [ ] type brackets. 

NOTE that frequently, in these sources, the original writers or translators
used parenthesis. I will type their parenthesis as standard ( ) parenthesis
brackets, just as they appear in their text. 

  _____  

NOTE ON THE SIRAT RASULALLAH: 

The Sirat was translated into English by A. Guillaume. He was a recognized
Islamic scholar. He wrote many books on Islam. He was the professor of
Arabic at the University of London, a member of the Arab Academy of
Damascus, and Royal Academy of Baghdad. A number of Arab Muslim scholars
worked with him on his translation of the Sirat. Guillaume was a
professional, he was not trying to discredit Muhammad in any way. He just
wanted to produce the best translation possible. Further, I have a book
written by Muslim apologists that quote from his translations of the Sirat. 

  _____  

NOTE ON THE TABAQAT: 

The Tabaqat was translated into English by Moinul Haq, a Pakistani. His work
was published by the Pakistan Historical Society. It is published in two
volumes. The title means "Book of the Major Classes". It also is basically a
biography of Muhammad. 

  _____  

MUHAMMAD AND MURDER IN MECCA 

Muhammad ordered the execution of 10 people when he took Mecca. Here is the
list of names found in Ibn Sa'd "Tabaqat". 

The quote is from the Tabaqat, Vol 2, page 168. 

"The apostle of Allah entered through Adhakhir, [into Mecca], and prohibited
fighting. He ordered six men and four women to be killed, they were (1)
Ikrimah Ibn Abi Jahl, (2) Habbar Ibn al-Aswad, (3) Abd Allah Ibn Sa'd Ibn
Abi Sarh, (4) Miqyas Ibn Sababah al-Laythi, (5) al-Huwayrith Ibn Nuqaydh,
(6) Abd Abbah Ibn Hilal Ibn Khatal al-Adrami, (7) Hind Bint Utbah, (8)
Sarah, the mawlat (enfranchised girl) of Amr Ibn Hashim, (9) Fartana and
(10) Qaribah. 

Occasionally, the Sirat, and the Tabaqat use a different name for the same
person. #3 in the list given above is such a case. The differences in the
name is due to the amount of family lineage given for the man's name, and
the English translation. 

Let's start with #3 in the list. The Sirat corroborates the Tabaqat's list,
a few at a time. And the Sirat gives much more detail concerning #3. You'll
see that in the end, this man was almost executed, but he got lucky because
Muhammad's men couldn't read Muhammad's mind! This case will give you a
glimpse into how Muhammad's mind worked. 

  _____  

QUOTING FROM THE SIRAT, PAGE 550. 

"The apostle had instructed his commanders when they entered Mecca only to
fight those who resisted them, except a small number who were to be killed
even if they were found beneath the curtains of the Kaba. Among them was
Abdullah Sa'd, brother of the B. Amir Luayy. The reason he ordered him to be
killed was that he had been a Muslim and used to write down revelation; then
he apostatized and returned to Quraysh [Mecca] and fled to Uthman Affan
whose foster brother he was. The latter hid him until he brought him to the
apostle after the situation in Mecca was tranquil, and asked that he might
be granted immunity. They allege that the apostle remained silent for a long
time till finally he [Muhammad] said yes [granting Abdullah immunity from
the execution order]. 

When Uthman had left he [Muhammad] said to his companions who were sitting
around him, "I kept silent so that one of you might get up and strike off
his head!" One of the Ansar said, "Then why didn't you give me a sign, O
apostle of God?" He answered that a prophet does not kill by pointing." 

Ibn Sa'd corroborates Ibn Ishaq and says on page 174: 

"A person of al-Ansar had taken a vow to kill Ibn Abi Sarh [the already
mentioned Abdullah] if he saw him. Uthman whose foster brother he (Ibn Abi
Sarh) was, came and interceded for him with the prophet. The Ansari was
waiting for the signal of the prophet to kill him. Uthman interceded and he
[Muhammad] let him go. The apostle of Allah said to the Ansari, "Why did you
not fulfil your vow?" He said, "O apostle of Allah! I had my hand on the
hilt of the sword waiting for your signal to kill him. The prophet said
signalling would have been a breach of faith. It does not behave the prophet
to make signal."" 

DISCUSSION 

Okay lets examine this one. Abdullah Sa'd used to write down Muhammad's
revelations, i.e., the Qur'an. Later, he apostatized, left Islam, and went
back to Mecca. As Muhammad took Mecca, he gave a general amnesty, except for
a number of people. Abdullah Sa'd is the first of this group mentioned.
Muhammad ordered that Abdullah be killed. 

Ali Dashti provides additional comments. I do not have all of the source
references Dashti had, but this will give you more insight into the reason
Muhammad ordered to have Abdullah killed. 

>From Ali Dashti's "23 Years, A study of the prophetic career of Muhammad",
page 98. 

"The last man named [in the list of people to be killed] had been one of the
scribes employed at Medina to write down the 'revelations'. On a number of
occassions, with Muhammad's consent, he changed the closing words of verses.
For example, when Muhammad said "And God is mighty and wise", Abdullah Sarh
suggested 'knowing and wise', and the prophet answered that there was no
objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Abdullah
renounced Islam on the ground that the revelations, if from God, could not
be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy,
he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites." 

So you see the background behind the order to murder Abdullah. He was a
threat to the credibility of the Qur'an. He was a Muslim, worked with
Muhammad in writing down the Qur'an, and, from time to time he suggested
some minor changes. Finally Abdullah realized that if this were truly from
God, no changes would be made at the suggestion of a mere scribe. So, he
realized Islam was false, and went back to Mecca. After Muhammad took Mecca,
and issued the order to kill him, he hid out with Uthman who was one of
Muhammad's closest companions. Later Abdullah pled for amnesty. Muhammad
wanted one of his men to kill him on the spot, but they didn't know, because
they couldn't read Muhammad's mind. So, finally Muhammad gave him amnesty. 

Note here that Ibn Hisham notes [note #803] that Abdullah became a Muslim
again, and obtained a political position in time. Surely you see that this
was a case of "If you can't beat em, join em." 

Muslims may say 'well, Muhammad ordered him to be killed, but Muhammad
accepted his repentance and let him live.' That is besides the point.
Muhammad really wanted him to die, it just didn't happen the way Muhammad
wanted. 

I have to comment here. Muhammad's reasoning is really stupid. Muhammad
issues an edit to have a man executed, but fails to have it carried out
because he doesn't want to make a signal with his hand??? Why didn't
Muhammad kill him himself? If this man had committed such a crime as to cost
him his life, why didn't Muhammad see that his death sentence be carried
out? 

This shows that Muhammad ordereds were made willy-nilly. This man committed
no major crime. Muhammad just wanted this man killed for personal reasons.
People lived or died depending on Muhammad's frame of mind. 

  _____  

So far, we have examined one execution order. Muhammad ordered that Abdullah
be executed, but Abdullah got lucky because Muhammad's men were not mind
readers. 

0 for 1. 

  _____  

Now lets go on with the Sirat, picking up where I left off on page 550. 

"Another [to be killed] was Abdullah Khatal of B. Taym b. Ghalib. He had
become a Muslim and the apostle sent him to collect the poor tax in company
with one of the Ansar. He had with him a freed slave who served him. (He was
Muslim). When they halted he ordered the latter to kill a goat for him and
prepare some food, and went to sleep. When he woke up the man had done
nothing, so he attacked and killed him and apostatized. He had two
singing-girls Fartana and her friend who used to sing satirical songs about
the apostle, so he ordered that they should be killed with him." 

Let's stop here and examine this paragraph. Muhammad ordered that a man who
apostasized, and his two slave girls, be killed. Khatal was ordered to be
killed not because he killed his male slave, a Muslim, but because he
apostasized. Islamic law does not allow a Muslim man to be put to death for
killing a slave. Muhammad also ordered two slave girls to be killed for
singing satirical songs about him. Remember, they sung these songs about
Muhammad years earlier. Now it was Muhammad's payback time. Look, these
slave girls were not threats to Islam, or to the new Islamic state. They
were only slave girls. They were ordered to be executed only because they
sang a silly song about Muhammad. More on them in a few paragraphs. 

Note here that Khatal is #6 in Ibn Sa'd's list. 

Now I will give you the info from Ibn Sa'd's book on Khatal, Vol 2, page 172
and on. I will not type out the chain of narrators. 

p172: 
"The apostle of Allah entered Makkah in the year of victory and on his head
there was a helmet. Then he removed it. Ma'n and Musa Ibn Dawud said in
their version: A person came to him and said, "O apostle of Allah! Ibn
Khatal is holding fast the curtains of al-Kabah. Thereupon the apostle of
Allah said: "Kill him." 
p173: 
"....kill him wherever you find him" 

Now then on to Bukhari's Hadith about Khatal, volume 5 #582. 

"Narrated Anas bin Malik: "On the day of the Conquest, the prophet entered
Mecca, wearing a helmet on his head. When he took it off, a man came and
said, "Ibn Khatal is clinging to the curtain of the Kaba." The prophet said
"Kill him." 

Khatal was not as fortunate as Abdullah. Ibn Sa'd says on page 174: 

"Verily the apostle of Alah ordered (his followers) on the day of the
Victory to kill Ibn Abi Sarh, Fartana Ibn al-Zibr'ra and Ibn Khatal. Abu
Barzah came and saw him (Ibn Khatal) holding fast the curtains of al-Kabah.
He (Abu Barzah) ripped open his belly. 

Okay, now we have a man who only apostasized from Islam executed. 

1 for 2. 

  _____  

Now I will jump ahead to page 551 of the Sirat to finish the story of the
slave girls. 

"As for Ibn Khatal's two singing girls, one was killed and the other ran
away until the apostle, asked for immunity, gave it to her." 

So, one girl was murdered, one ran away. When Muhammad eased up, she plead
for forgivenss, and he gave her immunity. 

  _____  

So, one of the slave girls escapes, the other is executed. Later, the living
slave girl begs forgiveness, and is forgiven. Again, this shows that
Muhammad's death sentences were willy-nilly. They mocked him, they paid (one
with her life). Later, as Muhammad felt more secure, he forgave the
remaining slave girl. 

2 for 4. 

  _____  

On page 551 of the Sirat: 

"Another was al-Huwayrith Nuqaydh Wahb Qusayy, one of those who used to
insult him in Mecca. ... Al-Huwayrith was killed by Ali. [Ali was Muhammad's
son in law.] 

What do you see here? This guy was murdered because he insulted Muhammad!
Ibn Hisham notes [804] that Huwayrith goaded a camel that two of Muhammad's
children were riding on. So, years later, he paid with his life. 

3 for 5. 

  _____  

Continuing on page 551 of the Sirat: 

"Another [ordered to be killed] was Miqyas Hubaba because he had killed an
Ansari who had killed his brother accidentally, and returned to Quraysh as a
polytheist." 

There is a reference to this on page 492: 

"Miqyas Subaba came from Mecca as a Muslim, so he professed, saying, "I come
to you as a Muslim seeking the bloodwit for my brother who was killed in
error." The apostle ordered that he should have the bloodwit for his brother
Hisham and he stopped a short while with the apostle. Then he attacked his
brother's slayer and killed him and went off to Mecca an apostate." 

This guy evidently became a Muslim and wanted revenge on the man who had
accidentlay killed his brother. Muhammad allowed him to take his revenge.
Miqyas then killed the other Muslim who accidently killed his brother. He
then left Islam as an apostate and returned to Mecca. Since the penalty for
leaving Islam is death, Muhammad had him killed. 

4 for 6. 

  _____  

Continuing on page 551 of the Sirat we read about Sara and Ikrima: 

"And Sara, freed slave of one of the Abdul-Muttalib [a tribe], and Ikrima
Abu Jahl. Sara had insulted him [Muhammad] in Mecca. As for Ikrima, he fled
to the Yaman. His wife Umm Hakim Harith Hisham became a Muslim and asked for
immunity for him and the apostle gave it. She went to the Yaman in search of
him and brought him to the apostle and he accepted Islam." ... 

"As for Ibn Khatal's two singing-girls, one was killed and the other ran
away until the apostle, asked for immunity, gave it her. Similarly Sara, who
lived until in the time of `Umar a mounted soldier trod her down in the
valley of Mecca and killed her. Al-Huwayrith was killed by `Ali." 

She was seemingly given immunity at the time, after Muhammad was more
secure, but she is later killed nevertheless. The text gives too little
detail. Was her death just an accident? Usually people don't die from
accidentally being hit by the hoof of a horse or camel. This looks
intentional, run over and then finished off, probably by the sword. She is
killed and al-Huwayrith is killed. The construction of the two sentences in
sequence is parallel and it gives the impression to be in consequence of
Muhammad's earlier command. 

Al-Tabari's text ("The History of Tabari", volume 8, SUNY, translated by
Michael Fishbein, p. 179) states about this incident: 

"She lived until someone in the time of Umar b. al-Khattab caused his horse
to trample her at Abtah and killed her. 

This confirms that this death was not an accident. It is again not stated
why she was killed, but it is likely that her earlier songs against Muhammad
are part of the ultimate reason for it. 

5 (4) for 8. 

For a side note, there is a hadith narrated by 'Ikrima, Bukhari,
<http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/084.sbt.html#
009.084.057> Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57: 

Narrated 'Ikrima: 

Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to 'Ali and he burnt them. The news of
this event, reached Ibn 'Abbas who said, "If I had been in his place, I
would not have burnt them, as Allah's Apostle forbade it, saying, 'Do not
punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire).' I would have killed them
according to the statement of Allah's Apostle, 'Whoever changed his Islamic
religion, then kill him.'" 

  _____  

How do you feel about freedom of religion? Should people be killed just
because they want to leave Islam? Muhammad said they should be killed. And
the saying is related by the person who himself got spared. 

  _____  

>From Ibn Sa'd's list, #2 is probably the man mentioned in Bukhari,
<http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/059.sbt.html#
005.059.662> Vol. 5, Book 59, #662 and Volume
<http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/056.sbt.html#
004.056.817> 4, Book 56, #817. Habbar Ibn al-Aswad b. Ka`b al-`Ansi. He was
murdered in Yemen. 

In Sirat Rasul Allah, page 648, the section heading is: "... and Al-Aswad
Al-`Ansi" and in the text he is called: al-Aswad b. Ka`b al-`Ansi. This
makes the connection of "al-`Ansi" in the Hadith with al-Aswad in Ibn Sa`d
likely. 

6 (5) for 9. 

  _____  

Number 7 on Ibn Sa'd's list was Hind bint Utbah. She was Abu Sufyan's wife.
Dashti notes that Muhammad had earlier ordered Sufyan to be killed. Sufyan
was a big leader in Mecca. He fought against Muhammad in battle. Just before
Muhammad took Mecca, Sufyan went out to Muhammad and was coerced into
accepting Islam, or be killed. Sufyan accepted Islam. Afterwards, Hind bint
Utbah accepted Islam and was spared. Hind had previously desecrated dead
Muslim bodies after the battle of Uhud. She even cut the liver out of one
dead Muslim and took a bite of it, and spit it out. She also mocked Muhammad
and the other defeated Muslims as they left the field. 

She asked forgivness and was forgiven. 

6 (5) for 10. 

  _____  

SUMMARY 

We see that some of these people were murdered simply because they had
rejected Muhammad and mocked him. Other's were ordered to be executed
because they had thought for themselves and left Islam. Most of these people
never lifted a weapon against Muhammad. Years later, Muhammad in his bitter
vengence, took revenge for the pain and humilation some of these people
caused him and had these people killed. 

  _____  

That's it for Ibn Sa'd's list of people Muhammad wanted killed when he took
Mecca. But there are a number of people who were murdered at Muhammad's
command BEFORE Muhammad took Mecca. I will address those people in another
paper. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to