http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=17 <http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=17&art_id=17303&sid=76 43322&con_type=1> &art_id=17303&sid=7643322&con_type=1
Iran defiant as UN deadline approaches Tehran April 25, 2006 - 2:59PM The AGE Iran's hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has rejected a UN Security Council demand to halt sensitive nuclear work and warned that the Islamic republic could quit the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The United States, meanwhile, said the Council would consider a draft resolution that would oblige Iran to comply or face possible military action. In a show of defiance just days away from Friday's deadline set by the Security Council for Iran to freeze uranium enrichment, Ahmadinejad yesterday confidently dismissed any threat of sanctions or even a US attack. And in his latest vitriolic attack against arch-enemy Israel, the firebrand leader said the "fake" Jewish state "cannot survive" and called on migrants to the country to go back to where they came from. "They shouldn't think they can baptise a wrong decision with the help of the Security Council," he said of demands that Iran stop enrichment, at the centre of fears that the Islamic regime could acquire nuclear weapons. Iran says it only wants to enrich uranium to make reactor fuel to generate electricity, as is authorised by the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) -- the cornerstone of efforts to avert the spread of nuclear weapons. But the Security Council wants a suspension of the work -- which can be extended to make weapons -- pending the completion of a now three year-old and still inconclusive probe by the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "Our policy is to work within the NPT and the Agency," Ahmadinejad told a news conference. "But if we see that they don't want to accept our rights, we will reconsider." The regime's increasingly defiant stance leaves it exposed to the risk of UN sanctions. The United States has also not ruled out the possibility of taking military action against the oil-rich Islamic republic. At the United Nations in New York, US ambassador John Bolton said the Security Council was to consider a draft resolution that would legally require Iran to comply with demands that it freeze all uranium enrichment activities. "Our expectation would be that assuming no change of direction by Iran and there's no reason to think there will be a change of direction, we'll look at a 'Chapter 7' resolution to make mandatory all the existing IAEA resolutions," he said. Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which is invoked in case of threats to international peace and security, can open the door to sanctions or even military action. But Ahmadinejad was unmoved by the warnings. "I see it as unlikely that they would be so unwise to do such a thing," he replied confidently when asked about the impact on Iran's economy if sanctions are imposed. "Those two or three countries who are so against us have enough sense not to make that mistake. They cannot create limitations for us. They will lose themselves. Our economic infrastructure is strong," he asserted. "A military attack does not make sense. Besides, our people are powerful and can defend themselves," he added, before firing off a stiff warning to Washington. "If they even talk about it, their situation will be very bad ... This is all psychological pressure and propaganda that they use in the form of words in the media to try to make us back down." Iran's defence minister also warned the United States that it risked a "disgraceful defeat". "If the US chooses the military option, a disgraceful defeat worse than the failure in Tabas desert awaits them," Mostafa Mohammad Najar said, referring to a failed US attempt to rescue American hostages seized at the US embassy in Tehran after the 1979 Islamic revolution. In London, British Prime Minister Tony Blair called for the world to send "a signal of strength" to Iran, but insisted "nobody is talking about military invasion". "So the real thing for me in respect of Iran is what are we going to do about it? All I'm saying is ... it's not advisable at this moment in time to send a signal of weakness. We want to show a signal of strength," Blair said. AFP [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
