http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50562
 
 BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS
'Islamic indoctrination' taken to Supreme Court
Asked to review case of class that had students 'become Muslims'

  _____  

Posted: June 9, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern




C 2006 WorldNetDaily.com 

A public-interest legal group is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a
decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowing a California public
school to engage in a three-week intensive course for 7th graders on how to
"become Muslims." 

A California federal trial court and the 9th Circuit, widely considered the
nation's most liberal appeals court, determined the class did not violate
the Constitution. 

As WND reported <http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28146> , the
lawsuit was filed by the Thomas More  <http://www.thomasmore.org/> Law
Center against the Byron  <http://www.cccoe.k12.ca.us/index.html> Union
School District and various school officials to stop the "Islam simulation"
materials and methods used in the Excelsior School in Byron, Calif. 

The 2001 course had students take Islamic names and wear identification tags
that displayed their new Islamic name and the Muslim star and crescent moon.
They also were handed materials that instructed them to "Remember Allah
always so that you may prosper"; complete the Islamic five pillars of faith,
including fasting; and memorize and recite the "Bismillah," or "In the name
of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate," which students also wrote on
banners hung on the classroom walls. 

Students also played "jihad games" during the course, which was part of the
school's world history and geography program. 

Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center,
said the "case cries out double standard." 

"The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is the same court that held our Pledge of
Allegiance unconstitutional because it contained the phrase 'under God,' and
yet they allow a three-week intensive course on how to become Muslims,
including class memorization of Islamic prayers and participation in Islamic
religious rituals," Thompson said. 

Edward L. White III, the Law Center's trial counsel handling the case,
argued that although a public school may teach about religion, the school
district "went far beyond an explanation of the historical or literary
significance of Islam and placed these seventh graders into the position of
becoming trainees in that religion." 

"These young children were indoctrinated in Islam, which the Constitution
forbids," White said. 

The Supreme Court will decide within the next few months whether to review
the case. 

The Law Center argues the panel did not address the plaintiff's claims that
their free exercise and parental rights had been violated. 

White says parents were never told about the Islamic program and didn't know
they had the option to remove their children from such an activity. 

One of the parents found out by accident, looking through her son's
schoolbag after the program had finished. 

In December 2003, the San Francisco court determined the
<http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36118> school district had
not violated the Constitution. 

In her 22-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton determined
Excelsior was not indoctrinating students about Islam when it required them
to adopt Muslim names and pray to Allah, but rather was just teaching them
about the Muslim religion. 

But White insists a line was crossed, placing the students in the "position
of being trainees in Islam, which is impermissible in a public school." 

When WorldNetDaily first
<http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26074> reported the story in
January 2002 - shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks committed by 19
Islamist terrorists - major controversy ensued nationwide. 

The course was part of a curriculum taught to seventh-graders all over the
state, included in the state's curriculum standards required by the state
board of education. <http://www.cde.ca.gov/board/>  Although the standards
outline what subjects should be taught and included in state assessment
tests, they didn't mandate how they're to be taught. 

At the end of the three-week course, Excelsior teacher Brooke Carlin
presented a final test requiring students to critique Muslim culture. 

The Islam simulations at Excelsior are outlined in the state-adopted
textbook "Across the Centuries," published by Houghton Mifflin, which
prompts students to imagine they are Islamic soldiers and Muslims on a Mecca
pilgrimage. 

The lawsuit also alleges students were encouraged to use such phrases in
their speech as "Allahu Akbar," which is Arabic for "Allah is greatest," and
were required to fast during lunch period to simulate fasting during the
Islamic holy month of Ramadan. 

Nevertheless, Judge Hamilton ruled the program was devoid of "any devotional
or religious intent" and was, therefore, educational, not religious in
nature. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to