http://americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4708 <http://americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4708&search=arlandson> &search=arlandson Illegal jihad in the Quran and early Islam (1) August 6th, 2005 Muslim spokespersons who have access to the news media are misleading the public about jihad. The Council on American Muslim Relations (CAIR ) says <http://cair-net.org/> the following about jihad at the time this present article was posted: Jihad does not mean holy war. Literally, jihad means to strive, struggle and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to improve the quality of life in society, struggle in the battlefield for self-defense (e.g., having a standing army for national defense), or fighting against tyranny or oppression. In reply, however, while it is true that a Muslim may wage jihad on the excess in his soul or on unbelief by non-violent means like argumentation, jihad must also include a military, violent war. Also, the clauses that say jihad means the struggle to improve the quality of life or the fight against tyranny and oppression are ambiguous. Islam expresses the will of Allah, and jihad battles anything that stands in its way. By any clear reading of the Quran, the hadith (reports of Muhammads words and actions outside of the Quran), the histories, the biographies and the law books on early Islam, jihad cannot exclude military warfare in the cause of Allah in order to expand Islam. Here is how jihad was done in early Islam. The Quran The Quran is the ultimate source for later legal opinions. It is considered completely reliable and inerrant. What does it say about jihad? What is the purpose or goal of jihad? A complicated policy like jihad can have multiple goals or purposes, but this one comes late in Muhammads life in Medina and best summarizes the goal and purposes. He wants to make Islam prevail over every religion. The following translation is approved and funded by the Saudi Royal family; the parenthetical explanations are inserted by the translators: 9:33 It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth, to make it superior over all religions, though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it). (Hilali and Khan, The Noble Quran, Riyadh: Darussalam, 1996, 2002; parenthetical notes are theirs) This verse is repeated two more times, word for word, in Suras 61:9 and 48:28. Muhammad means business. Seekers and the curious about Islam must understand this brute fact as they read the Quran: in the ten years that Muhammad lived in Medina (AD 622-632), he either sent out or went out on seventy-four small assassination hit squads, raids, expeditions, small battles, or full-scale wars like the Tabuk Crusade in AD 630, in which Muhammad led 30,000 soldiers north to invade the Byzantine empire. Sometimes the conflicts did not end in violence, but too many times they did. All verses (and there are not many) in the Medinan suras that seem to speak of peace and tolerance must be read in light of this violent historical context. Not far from the few tolerant verses the reader will find intolerant and violent verses. Sura 9:33, simply put, predicts the conquest of Islam over all religions. Islam must dominate the world through jihad. For a more detailed analysis of this verse and Suras 61:9 and 48:28, such as the literary and historical contexts, please see this article <http://answeringislam.org/Authors/Arlandson/death_economy.htm> . What are some rules of jihad? These rules are numbered for clarity, not priority. 1. Conquered women and children may be enslaved. In AD 627 Muhammad and his followers and allies withstood a large army of Meccans and their allies, without ever slugging it out in pitched battle. The Meccans attacked Medina because they were fed up with Muhammads aggressions against their trade. He dug trenches around Medina to diminish the advantage that the Meccans had with their cavalry. After about a month the Meccans withdrew because of a fair that was about to begin, and this large gathering from all over brought in money. But Muhammad was not finished. While he was bathing, the archangel Gabriel allegedly appeared to him and told him to attack the large Qurayza tribe of Jews. He besieged them in their fortress, and after some negotiations and a trial, the men were beheaded and their bodies and heads dragged and tossed into the trenches, whereas the women and children were sold into slavery. These three verses, especially v. 26, in Sura 33 deal with this indefensible atrocity: 33:25 Allah turned back the unbelievers [Meccans and their allies] in a state of rage, having not won any good, and Allah spared the believers battle [q-t-l]. Allah is, indeed, Strong and Mighty. 26 And He brought those of the People of the Book [Qurayza] who supported them from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you slew [q-t-l] and some you took captive. 27 And he bequeathed to you their lands, their homes and their possessions, together with land you have never trodden. Allah has power over everything. (Majid Fakhry, An Interpretation of the Quran, NYUP, 2000, 2004) These verses seem to celebrate death and conquest. The key root word in brackets, q-t-l or qital or qatala, means killing, warring, and slaughtering. This meaning is much more restricted than jihad, though this latter word can also mean killing, warring, or slaughtering. Next, Allah permits the enslavement of Qurayza women and children, so later Muslim familiar with the background of this verse will follow their prophet in this practice. Finally, Allah permits Muhammad to take the Jewish clans property on the basis of conquest and his possession of all things. This is a dubious revelation and reasoning. Allah speaks, and this benefits Muhammad materially. This happens too often in Muhammads life. Selling humans into slavery produced a lot of wealth, so the Allah-inspired prophet never got a revelation that this practice should stop permanently and forever. Muslim apologists (defenders of Islam), understandably, are quick to explain (away) this atrocity, but their standard lines of defense have been answered here <http://answeringislam.org/Authors/Arlandson/jews.htm> . (Scroll down to Politics, Warfare, and Conquest, and point no. 5.) 2. Women captives are sometimes forced to marry their Muslim masters, regardless of the marital status of the women. That is, the masters are allowed to have sex with their enslaved sex objects. Sayyid Abul ALa Maududi, a highly respected Muslim commentator, reminds us that the historical context of the next sura finds Muhammad establishing rules for his community within two to five years after his Hijrah (Emigration) in AD 622. He lays down laws for marriage. What happens to slave women who are captured during the raids that the Muslims go on frequently? Sura 4:24 says: 4:24 And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands (as prisoners of war) . . . (Sayyid ALa Abul Maududi, The Meaning of the Quran, vol. 1, p. 319). Maududi says in his comment on the verse that is it lawful for Muslims to marry women prisoners of war even when their husbands are still alive. But what happens if the husbands are captured with their wives? Maududi cites a school of law that says Muslims may not marry them, but two other schools, notably one that is analyzed under Classical legal opinions, in Part Two, say that the marriage between the captive husbands and wives is broken (note 44). But why would a debate over this emerge? The answer is obvious for those who understand simple justice. No marriage should take place between prisoners of war and their captors, married or not. No sex should take place between women captives and their Muslim overlords. But Islam traffics in injustice too often, as we saw with the Qurayza tribe. Islam allows deep immorality with women who are in their most helpless condition. This crime is reprehensible, but Allah wills it nonethelessthe Quran says so. For more information on this Quran-inspired immorality, see this short article <http://answeringislam.org/Shamoun/privileges.htm> . The hadith, in the next major section, demonstrate that Muslims jihadists actually have sex with the captured women, whether or not they are married. 3. A captured enemy may be killed, ransomed by money or by an exchange, enslaved, or released freely. Sura 33:26 speaks of killing captured men and enslaving women and children (the same may be done to men in other battles, as the hadith and history demonstrate). A verse that comes earlier in the same sura says that after the captives are bound firmly, they may be released by grace or freely or by ransom. 33:4 When you meet the disbelievers in battle, strike them in the neck, and once they are defeated, bind any captives firmlylater you can release them by grace or by ransomuntil the toils of war have ended. That [is the way]. (Haleem) Imprisonment may be just if the captured enemy may return to fight against the conqueror at a later time. But selling prisoners of war was an Arab custom that Allah should have abolished in a revelation to his prophet. But why should Muhammad receive this just revelation when money could be made by ransoming prisoners? Allah should have taken away this option and allowed only free release or imprisonment. 4. The conquered are allowed (or forced) to convert. In Sura 8, which deals with the Battle of Badr in AD 624, Muhammad proposes these options to his captives. 8:70 Prophet, tell those you have taken captive, If God knows of any good in your hearts, He will give you something better [Islam] than what has been taken from you [the caravan], and He will forgive you . . . . (Haleem) Muhammad tells them that if the conquered Meccans had any sense, they would realize that Allah had a divine plan: expose them to Islam. This is better than all the material riches they can trade in. However, it is not difficult to imagine a Meccan muttering under his breath that he would prefer to takes his money and goods and return to Mecca, wanting Muhammad to stop harassing the Meccans trade. 5. Is it lawful to kill old men and Christian monks? One school of law in the section Classical legal opinions, in Part Two (appearing tomorrow), says that it is legal to kill old men and monks. Where may they get this opinion? We should recall that Sura 33:26 says that all the men of the Qurayza tribe were killed, so that verse alone justifies this atrocity. It is also possible that the school of law analyzed in the section Classical legal opinions justifies the death of monks from two passages. First, Allah says to fight Jews and Christians or People of the Book in Sura 9, the historical context of which has been discussed above (What is the purpose or goal of jihad?): 9:29 Fight [q-t-l] against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Hilali and Khan) Then Muhammad condemns rabbis and monks who devour the property of people and bar them from following the path of Allah (read: convert to Islam) in the same sura: 9:33 O believers [Muslims], many of the rabbis and monks devour the property of the people unjustly and bar others from the Path of Allah [Islam]. Those who hoard gold and silver and do not spend them in Allahs path, announce to them a very painful punishment. (Fakhry) It is true that Muhammad goes on to explain an eternal hellish punishment for monks (v. 35), but it is not farfetched to believe that a radical school of law would combine the command to fight People of the Book (v. 29), with the condemnation of unjust and greedy monks. Why would these monks not be the first ones to be killed in a battle? However, it may be the case that the radical school of law may justify their deaths simply because they are Christian leaders. 6. Property may be stolen. Muhammad fought the Battle of Badr in AD 624, in which 320 or so Muslims won a surprise victory over about 1000 Meccans. Their caravan was traveling south from Syria back to Mecca, and Muhammad intended to capture it. The Meccans got word of this raid and sent their army up to meet their caravan. Sura 8 deals with this (in)famous battle, and this verse says that Muhammad wanted the unarmed group (the large caravan), but Allah gave him not only that one, but also the armed group so that truth may prevail. 8:7 Remember how God promised you [believers] that one of the two enemy groups [the Meccan trade caravan or their army] would fall to you: you wanted the unarmed group to be your, but it was Gods will to establish the truth according to His word and to finish off the disbelievers (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Quran, Oxford UP, 2004) Muslim apologists assert that the Muslims wanted the caravan, whereas Muhammad rose above such pettiness. However, historical facts say the opposite. He was constantly conducting raids to capture spoils. If not, why did he not return the caravan and preach at the Meccans only? It is always dubious to connect Gods truth with military victory, but no matter, for Muhammad captured a huge caravan, and now he was richer than ever before. Also, we should not overlook Sura 33:27, quoted above, that promises all of the property of the Qurayza tribe: 33:27 And he bequeathed to you their lands, their homes and their possessions, together with land you have never trodden. Allah has power over everything. (Fakhry) The word bequeathed is a euphemism for stole by conquest. As noted, timely and coincidental revelations that benefit Muhammad materially come often enough in his life. 7. Fruit trees may be destroyed. In AD 625, Muhammad is strong enough to exile the Nadir tribe of Jews, besieging them in their strongholds for fifteen days until he started destroying their date palms, their livelihood, so they capitulated to his first demand for blood-wit money, which compensates for loss of life. However, he raised the penaltythey must get nothing from their palms. Their livelihood undergoing destruction and then theft, they departed to the city of Khaybar, seventy miles to the north, where they had estates. This takeover helped relieve the ongoing poverty of many Muslims, who took over their date orchards. This verse in Sura 59 justifies his illegal act: 59:5 Whatever you [believers] may have done to [their] palm treescutting them down or leaving them standing on their rootswas done by Gods leave [permission], so that He might disgrace those who defied Him. (Haleem) This is another coincidental and timely revelation that seeks to justify the unjustifiable. Later Muslim warriors may use this practice to destroy other assets that are valuable to civilians. See this article <http://answeringislam.org/Authors/Arlandson/jews.htm> for more details on the conflict with the Nadir tribe. 8. Homes may be destroyed. In the same sura, Muhammad destroys the homes of the Nadir tribe. 59:2 . . . God came upon them [Jews of the Nadir tribe] from where they least expected and put panic into their hearts: they brought ruin to their own homes by their own hands, as well as the hands of the believers [Muslims] . . . . (Haleem) A classical opinion of one school of law (see Classical legal opinions, Part Two) agrees and also says that homes may be destroyed. This is also unjust for the revelation-soaked religion of Islam. 9. Three options are imposed on the enemy. It should be recalled that Sura 9:29 lays out some conditions for the People of the Book, when a Muslim army gathers outside their city gate, as Muslim interpreters agree: (1) Fight and die; (2) convert; (3) keep their religion, but pay a tax, the jizyah, which Muslim apologists (defenders) argue amounted to protection for the privilege of living under Islam (read: not be attacked again). This is as close as Muhammad can get to forcing the enemy to convert without technically forcing them. This policy will be worked out and further imposed after Muhammad dies of a fever in AD 632, and the policy will not always keep these fine line distinctions. What happens to the spoils in jihad? As noted in the previous section, Sura 8 deals with the Muslims surprise victory over the Meccans at the Battle of Badr in AD 624. After their victory, Arab custom demanded that the warriors get a share of the spoils of war. Muhammad says in 8:41, Know that one-fifth of your battle gains belongs to God and the Messenger . . . (Haleem). That is, Muhammad gets twenty percent for himself and for the needy in his community, as he distributes it. The warriors were to get eighty percent. This eighty percent distribution is a strong inducement to keep the Arab custom of raiding alive. Why would Muhammad get a revelation telling him to follow the way of peace without warfare and raids? Twenty percent for him and eighty percent for his warriors speak more loudly than Gabriel. What happens to martyrs in jihad? Martyrs are guaranteed a fast track to Islamic paradise. Their deaths are depicted in economic terms. If they expend their lives as a living currency, Allah will exchange them for heavenly Islamic gardens. 61:10 You who believe, shall I show you a bargain that will save you from painful punishment? 11 Have faith in God and His Messenger and struggle [j-h-d] for His cause with your possessions and your personsthat is better for you, if only you knew12 and He will forgive your sins, admit you into Gardens graced with flowing streams, into pleasant dwellings in the Gardens of Eternity. That is the supreme triumph. (Haleem) Muslims who struggle (j-h-d) in Allahs cause will either win the battle and live to see another day, so that they can collect some spoils of war, or they will die and have their sins forgiven and be admitted into Islamic heaven. Sura 9:111 carries on the economic bargain. 9:111 God has purchased the persons and possessions of the believers for the Gardenthey fight [q-t-l] in Gods way: they kill [q-t-l] and are killed [q-t-l]this is a true promise given by Him in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran. Who could be more faithful to his promise than God? So be happy with the bargain you have made: that is the supreme triumph. (Haleem) Two things should be noticed here. First, the root q-t-l is used three times in this short verse. Qital or qatala, as noted in the section What are some rules of jihad? means killing, warring, and slaughtering and is therefore less ambiguous or has a more restricted meaning than jihad, though this latter word can mean those same bloody acts. Thus, if Muslim apologists (defenders) explain (away) jihad as non-violent, then they have not factored in qital. For the historical and literary contexts and a more thorough analysis of Suras 61:10 and 9:111, please refer to this article <http://answeringislam.org/Authors/Arlandson/death_economy.htm> . If the readers would like to see the heavenly virgin verses in the Quran, they should go here <http://quranbrowser.com/> , <http://quranbrowser.com/> and type in these references: 44:51-56; 52:17-29; 55:46-78. This is reason enough for dazed and confused young men to join Islam and become radicalized. The Hadith The hadith are the reports of Muhammads words and actions outside of the Quran. The three most reliable hadith collectors and editors are Bukhari (d. 870), Muslim (d. 875), and Abu Dawud (d. 875). The Quran and the hadith are the foundations for later legal rulings. What is the purpose or goal of jihad? The hadith follows the Quran in this question. Islam must be made superior over all other religions. A man asked Muhammad what men fight for: war booty, fame, or showing off. Muhammad replied: He who fights that Allahs word (i.e. Allahs religion of Islamic monotheism) be superior is in Allahs cause (Bukhari, Jihad, no. 2810, in Muhammad Muhsin Khans translation and edition, Riyadh: Darussallam, 1997; this edition of Bukhari is used throughout this section). Allahs religion must become superior over all other religions, a decree that echoes Suras 61:9 and 9:111, above. This tradition says that Muhammad will fight anyone until they confess that Allah is God and that Muhammad is his messenger. Allahs Messenger [Muhammad] said: I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against people till they say . . . (none has the right to worshiped but Allah), and whoever said [this] he saved his life and property from me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah . . . . (Bukhari, Jihad, no. 2946, cf. no. 25 and 1399) It is the will of Allah that Islam must spread around the world and dominate it. If people submit to Islam, then their property and lives will be safe. What are some rules of jihad? The rules are numbered for clarity, not priority. They cover the same topics in the previous section on the Quran, with only a few exceptions. 1. Besides being enslaved, women are subjected to sex with their new Muslim masters. Ali, Muhammads cousin and son-in-law, just finished a relaxing bath. Why? The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and . . . Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). What was Muhammads response to the person who hated Ali for this sexual act? Do you hate Ali for this? . . . Dont hate him, for he deserves more than that from Khumus (Bukhari, War Expeditions, no. 4350). Khumus is one-fifth of the war booty, and Muhammad casually believes that slave women who are part of the one-fifth can be treated like sexual property. Ali is a Muslim hero. So why would the model prophet for the world scold his son-in-law who was married to his daughter Fatima, from his first wife Khadija? After all, slaves are fair sexual game. 2. The same sexual abuse happened to women who were part of the four-fifths of the spoils of war. Jihadists usually practiced coitus interruptus as they raped their slave women. While on a military campaign and away from their wives, Muslim jihadists received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. They asked the holy Prophet about this, and it is important to note what he did not say. He did not scold them or prohibit the immoral practice, declaring it haram (prohibited). Rather, he gets lost in theology and the quirky doctrine of fate: It is better for you not to do so. There is no person that is destined to exist, but will come to existence, till the Day of Resurrection. That is, these enquiring Muslims should stop doing coitus interruptus, but instead go all the way with the enslaved sex objects. Fate controls who should be born (Bukhari, Military Expeditions, no. 4138). It is one thing for some soldiers in any army to strike out on their own and rape women. All armies have criminal soldiers who commit this repugnant act. But it is quite another to codify rape in a sacred text. Islam codifies and legalizes rape for conquering jihadists. 3. In one tradition, women and children should not be killed (Bukhari, Jihad, nos. 3014-3105; Muslim nos. 4319-4320; Abu Dawud, no. 2662). But this makes economic sense, because the victors could sell them into slavery or enjoy more sexual license with them. 4. However, in another tradition, the women and children of polytheists are permitted to be killed during nighttime raids when visibility is low. A Muslim asked Muhammad about the polytheist whose settlement were attacked at night when some of their offspring and women were smitten [killed]. The Prophet . . . said: They are of them (Abu Dawud no. 2666; Bukhari, Jihad, no. 3012; Muslim nos. 4321-4323). That is, they are all the samethey are polytheists, enough said. Ahmad Hasan, the translator of Abu Dawud, as well as Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, the translator of Muslim, are quick to add that the killing takes place at night when the men and the women and children cannot be distinguished. However, this is small comfort for the women and children who were killed. It would seem that an Allah-inspired prophet would be more cautious. If it was probable that women and children would get killed in a night attack, Muhammad should have forbidden these untimely attacks. 5. The enemy may be killed, enslaved, ransomed, released freely, or beaten. Abu Dawud says that a captured enemy combatant may be killed (no. 2680); he may be tied with chains as a slave (no. 2671-2674); he is allowed to be beaten in order to extract information (no. 2675); he may be released freely (no. 2682-2683), or he may be ransomed; that is, he may purchase his freedom (nos. 2684-2688). Ibn Ishaq (d. 767) is not a collector and editor of hadith, but he is an early biographer of Muhammad; he lived a century before the three hadith editors used in this section. His book, The Life of Muhammad, (trans. A. Guillaume, Oxford UP, 1955), is a primary source for later reputable historians. He reports an egregious incident that occurred during the holy Prophets conquest of the predominantly Jewish city of Khaybar in AD 628. In order to extract information on the location of the wealth of the city, Muhammad tortured a hapless citizen. See this short article <http://answeringislam.org/Green/torture.htm> for more details on Muhammads use of torture. 6. Men are allowed (or forced) to convert. It is true that a non-Muslim could embrace Islam anytime he wished, but Islam has the messy problem of armies accompanying their preachers. The passage in Bukhari, cited under the section What is the purpose or goal of jihad? says that Muhammad was ordered by Allah to call people to accept Islam (Jihad, no. 2946; cf. nos. 25 and 1399). If they convert, then their lives and property will be kept safe from him. These hadiths from Bukhari make the same offer: Jihad, nos. 2937, 2940, 3010, and 3058). This is the entire mission of Muhammad: bring the entire world under Islam, the best religion that Allahthe god of the Arabian Peninsulahas to offer. The problem with this mission is that a Muslim army lurked in the background or stood in the foreground to this alleged freedom of religion. Only the strongest of the strong could resist this offer. 7. In Islamic war, old men who are polytheists may be killed. Kill the old men who are polytheists, but spare their children (Abu Dawud, no. 2664). The translator of this hadith collection says that decrepit old men may not be killed, but how is a warrior supposed to distinguish them, except in extreme cases? 8. Property may be stolen. In the section, What is the purpose or goal of jihad? a hadith says that Muhammad has been ordered by his deity that he should fight until everyone says Allah is God and Muhammad is his messenger. If they do, then their property and lives are safe (Bukhari, Jihad, no. 2946; cf. nos. 25 and 1399). It is often claimed that Islam does not force conversions. But only the strongest of the strong could resist this threat. If they do not submit to this divine order, then they lose their property and lives. This actually happened throughout the many raids and wars that early Muslims embarked on. The rule of to the victors go the spoils is unjust for a religious system. 9. Fruit trees may be destroyed. It should be recalled that Muhammad besieged the Nadir tribe of Jews, and they finally surrendered when he was in the process of destroying their date palm orchards and homes. The hadith refers to this historical event and approves of it (Muslim nos. 4324-4326; Abu Dawud no. 2609). This is also unjust because by analogy jihadists may possibly destroy other sources of food among the civilians. 10. Three options are imposed on the conquered. The hadith collector and editor Muslim says that Muhammad would exhort his jihadists to make three offers when their army surrounds a town or settlement: (1) the surrounded enemy may convert; (2) they may refuse to accept Islam and pay the jizya or poll tax, which allows non-Muslims to live under the protection of Islam (read: not be attacked again); or (3) they must be fought if they refuse the first two (no. 4294; see Abu Dawud no. 2606). These three options appear in Muslims hadith as being granted to polytheists, but history demonstrates that they were conquered or killed completely. The second option was taken away from them. But all three were offered to the People of the Book, or Jews and Christians (Sura 9:29). What happens to the spoils in jihad? In the hadith collection edited by Bukhari, an entire section is called The Book of Obligations of Khumus. This latter word means one-fifth of the spoils of war. So twenty percent goes to Muhammad or the State, and eighty percent goes to the soldiers. However, this eighty percent can be divided along different lines. A horseman should get three shares, whereas an infantryman should get only two (Abu Dawud nos. 2728-2730). Another tradition distributes the spoils, as follows: two for the horseman, and one for the footman (Muslim no. 4358). Islam, led by Allah and Muhammad, allegedly breaks down class hierarchy, but this uneven distribution keeps it alive in the most visible way. Horses were expensive, so only the upper classes could afford them, especially in going out to war. But they get a lot more than the lowly foot soldier. What happens to the martyrs in jihad? The hadith, like the Quran, promises the fast track to Islamic paradise for jihadists. This hadith says that no one would wish to return to this earthly world, except the martyrs, so that they could die again. The Prophet said: Nobody who dies and finds good from Allah (in the Hereafter) would wish to come back to this world, even if he were given the whole world and whatever is in it, except the martyr who, on seeing the superiority of martyrdom, would like to come back to the world and get killed again in Allahs cause. (Bukhari, Jihad, nos. 2795, 2797; cf. nos. 36, 97, 2795, and 2817). The martyrs get beautiful dark-eyed houris or virgins in Islamic heaven. They are called so [fair or light females with dark eyes] as ones eyesight is perplexed while looking at them, and also because of the intense blackness of their irises and intense whiteness of the sclerotic coat of their eyes . . . . (Bukhari, Jihad, Chapter 6) This one says that Islamic paradise has one hundred grades that are reserved for the mujahadeen or jihadists (note three letter root j-h-d in mujahideen and jihad). . . . . The prophet said, Paradise has one hundred grades which Allah has reserved for the Mujahidun who fight in Allahs Cause, and the distance between each of two grades is like the distance between heaven and the earth. So when you ask Allah (for something), ask for the Al-Firdaus which is the middle (best) and the highest part of Paradise. (Bukhari, Jihad, no. 2790) This is reason enough for a dazed and confused young would-be jihadist to join the cause of Allah (cause = war). Before moving on to Part Two, we should take stock of the last two sections.
The hadith follows the Quran closely. Both sources permit injustices in jihad. Muslim soldiers are allowed to rape and enslave captured women. Male enemies may be executed. In nighttime raids women and children are permitted to leave this life, provided it is not deliberate. However, what does this say about Muhammads capacity to be rightly guided in life-and-death policies in jihad? Jihadists are allowed to destroy homes and fruit trees of an entire tribe, the Nadir, so this means that they are allowed do to this to the homes and fruit trees of other enemies. The Quran, a pure revelation from Allah, says so. By analogy, the Muslim soldiers may do this to other kinds of civilian property if this helps them win the conflict. Muhammad should have received a revelation that contradicts this excess. One powerful motive for waging jihad is the material benefits. The conquered territories fall under the control of the jihadists, and they are permitted to keep it. If anyone is looking for the reason for the spread of Islam, then this is a solid one, (though other reasons come into play, like following the will of Allah). The newly conquered have the option to convert, in which case they pay a forced charity or zakat tax. Or they are allowed to remain in the Biblical faith and pay a jizya or poll tax. Granted, it is often asserted that the jizya is less than the forced charity tax, but either way, money flows into the Islamic treasury. Why would Muhammad receive a revelation that dries up this money flow, especially when it is connected to military war? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
