http://www.jinsa.org/JINSAReports/3516 Strange, But True JINSA Report #595 16 August 2006 The most obvious shortcomings of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 are: a) that there is no mechanism to enforce its demands - specifically that Hezbollah be disarmed, and; b) no mandate for the proposed UN force. It was no surprise, therefore, that: a) Hezbollah announced that it would not, in fact, disarm, and; b) although a number of countries indicated a willingness to consider joining the UN force, none has made a specific commitment. And, therefore, it IS a surprise to find the French foreign minister jetting to Beirut for discussions with the Lebanese prime minister on the "Lebanese plan" for Hezbollah's disarmament. According to The Financial Times, French officials said "Paris would resist leading a bolstered international force in southern Lebanon without Lebanese government assurances that Hezbollah ... would be disarmed," as Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy prepared for his trip, "a visit likely to prove pivotal in deciding the fate of the multinational UN force... Aides to Mr. Douste-Blazy said he wanted to hear the Lebanese Army's plan for removing Hezbollah's missiles from a 'buffer zone' in south Lebanon. French officials ... say an international force could not be deployed until a demilitarized zone was created." The story continues. "Diplomats in Paris are worried [are they surprised?] that Hezbollah, which has declared the ceasefire a 'historic victory' for the Arabs, has been emboldened and is now less likely to lay down its weapons. French officials said Mr. Douste-Blazy would not accept any Lebanese plan short of a full disarmament ... starting with the 20 km wide zone south of the Litani River. 'We want an application of UN resolution 1701 in all its aspects,' said a French diplomatic aide. 'It is up to the Lebanese government to ensure the disarmament of Hezbollah,' the aide said." The Lebanese, on the other hand, are playing their traditional role. Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora has used the time to perfect his whine about "poor Lebanon" and its inability to take on its obligations. The Lebanese defense minister said the Lebanese Army had "no intention" of disarming Hezbollah. According to the Financial Times, Elias Murr "suggested Hezbollah understood that weapons could no longer be visible in the buffer zone, but said that if troops came across missiles they would not take them away." But if we are no more pleased with the UN this week than last, we have to admit that we are pleased [and indeed surprised] to see France put its prestige on the line on behalf of disarming Hezbollah - an act that would benefit Israel and help minimize the "victory" claimed by Iran and Syria. And pleased that the German Foreign Minister canceled his trip to Syria after Assad's rant. Bilateral diplomacy raises the stakes for France and Germany, and they didn't have to do it. They could have pretended that the multilateral UN mush, for which no one is ultimately responsible, was sufficient diplomatic exertion. They could have pretended none of this has anything to do with them. They could have pretended it was Israel's fault. It wouldn't have been the first time. But they didn't. The rapid movement of European diplomats to secure the (very) slender benefits of UNSCR 1701 for Israel is welcome. JINSA 1779 Massachusetts Ave., NW Suite 515 Washington, DC 20036 202-667-3900 202-667-0601 Fax
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
