http://wizbangblog.com/2006/09/05/the-cair-across-my-butt.php
 

The CAIR across my butt

Yesterday, I engaged in
<http://wizbangblog.com/2006/09/04/help-help-were-being-oppressed.php>
another cheap shot against the Council on American-Islamic Relations. One
commenter challenged me, saying that groups like CAIR that intend to
reconcile the differences between Muslims and the West should be encouraged,
not slammed.
Steve was right -- at least, in part. We should be pushing for such groups
to form and act. 
Unfortunately, though, CAIR is not one of them.
CAIR is not a civil rights group, a public interest watchdog, or any of
those other things usually considered laudable. They are an advocacy group
at best, focused entirely on their own agenda. At worst, they're the
propaganda arm, the advance force, of Islamic fascism (the current name) in
the United States.
Why don't I like them? Like I said earlier about
<http://wizbangblog.com/2006/09/03/for-gods-sake.php> religions, I look past
their words and focus on their deeds. And those deeds speak volumes. This
may be an odd thing for a blogger to say, but talk is cheap. And CAIR has a
lengthy history of actions that demonstrate their true agenda.
First off, they can be argued as "the fruit of the poisoned tree," to use a
legalistic metaphor. Several of their leaders have lengthy, established ties
to Islamic terrorism. Ghassan Elashi, the founder of CAIR's Texas chapter,
has been convicted of raising money for Hamas under the guise of "charity."
Bassem Khafagi, former CAIR Community Affairs Director, pleaded guilty to
bank and visa fraud and was deported back to Egypt. Randall Todd "Ismail"
Royer, former CAIR spokesman, has pleaded guilty to weapons and explosives
charges while trying to help Muslim terrorists trying to drive India out of
Kashmir. And that's just three I can find readily.
Secondly, they take on the stupidest causes and cry "discrimination" over
the silliest reasons. In Florida, a convicted felon who had converted to
Islam sued the state of Alabama because they refused to allow her to pose
for her driver's license while wearing the fill hijab, leaving only her eyes
exposed --
<http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2004-02/21/article02.shtml> and
CAIR backed her suit. (Thanks, Oyster, for clarifying this. I initially said
Florida, but changed it to Alabama when a very cursory check turned up the
Alabama case, and I did indeed confuse the two.)
Thirdly, they engage in such petty lies and fraud as to PhotoShop (crudely)
a hijab on a woman who dared show up for one of their events bare-headed,
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/008110.php> releasing the photo to the
public.
Fourthly, they have a tendency to take their critics and those who dare to
disagree with them to court over the most spurious reasons, in what I can
only call a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Protest)-like strategy.
They have sued and/or otherwise hassled critics like Robert Spencer, Michael
Graham (hounding him out of his DC talk show job, but he ended up with
another gig in Boston), the Wiesenthal Center, Daniel Pipes, Lt. General
William Boykin, Don Imus, the film "United 93," Jackie Mason, and others.
They sued the  <http://wizbangblog.com/2006/09/05/www.anti-cair-net.org>
Anti-CAIR web site for "defamation," then dropped their suit when Anti-CAIR
refused to cave and instead threatened to subpoena all sorts of embarassing
records that would have proven their allegations that CAIR labeled
"defamatory."
To my understanding, CAIR's overall policy is that Muslims -- especially
those that practice their approved "brand" of Islam -- have absolute rights
to do whatever they want, and those who criticize them have no rights
whatsoever. And if those practices should run up against others' rights,
others' beliefs, or the laws of our nation, those competing interests must
yield to Islam. The essential rightness or wrongness of the positions are
irrelevant; the Muslims are always in the right. If they want a driver's
license with their face entirely masked save for their eyes, that's fine. If
they feel the need to fake a head covering on a woman who didn't wear one at
their event, that's all right. And if anyone dares speak against them, using
the plain, unvarnished, simple truth as their weapon, then they need to be
denounced, protested against, even sued to silence them. 
Yes, people and groups that wish to promote peace and understanding between
Muslims and non-Muslims ought to be encouraged. 
It's just a pity that CAIR, one of the most prominent Muslim advocates in
the United States, isn't one of those groups.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to