http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/index.php?artID=648
 
September 13, 2006

Fifth column
Listening to President Bush speak, on Monday's anniversary of 9/11, after a
day of distastefully sentimental memorials, my question was not what have we
achieved in the last five years, but rather, what have we learned? Bush and
Blair -- the captain and vice-captain of Team West in the war against "the
terrorists" so far -- are both now in the twilight of their political
careers. Both have recently broken with habitual discretion, and made
attempts to name the enemy. This has, if anything, added to their
unpopularity, for when they mention that the enemy presents himself as
Islamic, there are shrill cries not only from radical Muslims, but across
the spectrum of the Left in the West.
Mr Bush, much the less eloquent of the two, has now retreated from his use
of the term "Islamofascist" -- which as I said in a previous column, is a
fairer label than "Islamist" for an enemy that spreads a palampore of
traditional Islam, over a stuffing from the Western-bred totalitarian
ideologies of the 20th century. As I wrote Aug. 27, from Ahmadinejad to
Zawahiri, we hear rhetoric that uses an Islamic vocabulary and crude
grammar, but animated with a syntax that owes more to Hitler, Stalin, and
Mao, than to the Prophet and his traditional interpreters. The term is thus
meant to suggest a skewed Islam, an Islam "adapted to our age" by
psychopathic men, whose own Islamic learning is purposefully politicized,
and aggressively de-spiritualized. Since the alternative would be to say
that Ahmadinejad, Zawahiri, et al. do speak legitimately for Islam, I don't
see why anyone should object to the term "Islamofascist".
Mr Blair gave an interview worth reading to the Israeli daily, Haaretz,
published Monday. The editors present characterized it as "sombre". The
British prime minister was still going through the motions of advocating the
"peace process", and the "two-state solution" for Israel and Palestine,
without (according to me) any real conviction that it could work. It is just
something Western politicians do to please the figurative "Arab street", and
it does not please anyone, any more. With much more conviction, he said
leaders throughout the West have grasped that we are in a truly "global
struggle", for which the people of the West are not prepared. The
politicians have failed to explain to us how much is at stake, and how much
will be lost if we are not resolute in defence of Western values.
For all its uncharacteristic awkwardness, Mr Blair's answer to a question
about British home-grown terrorists donged the bell:
"It's not necessarily what have we done wrong, because part of the problem
of what you have in Western opinion is that Western opinion always wants to
believe that it's our fault and these people want to have a sort of, you
know, grievance culture that they visit upon us and say it's our fault. And
so we have a young British-born man of Pakistani origin sitting in front of
a television screen saying I will go and kill innocent people because of the
oppression of Muslims, when he has been brought up in a country that has
given him complete religious freedom and full democratic rights and actually
a very good job and standard of living. Now, that warped mind has grown out
of a global movement based on a perversion of Islam which we have to
confront, and we have to confront it globally."
I frankly admire both Bush and Blair, as courageous politicians, with open
minds, doing their best within the limits of what is politically possible in
their respective spheres. They are both towering figures, in comparison to
the little men who oppose them. We won't know what trouble is, until the
little men replace them.
I continue optimistic about what can be done, should we summon the will to
do it. I have written repeatedly that a robust and unified Western response
to "Islamofascism" could fling it quickly onto the trash-heap of history, to
join Nasserism and Baathism and other earlier manifestations of Arab
nationalism and socialism. Smack it hard, without apology.
My pessimism is founded in the fear that this robust and unified response
cannot be mobilized. We have a huge fifth column in the West, and it is not
the Muslim immigrants. They become radicalized only because our "victim
culture" encourages them to nurture their grievances. Yet most, despite
temptation, remain good, decent people, doing their share of the West's
work.
Our real enemy is within us, in the immense constituency of the
half-educated narcissists pouring from our universities each year -- that
glib, smug, liberal, and defeatist "victim culture" itself, that inhabits
the academy, our media, our legal establishment, the bureaucratic class. The
opinion leaders of our society, who live almost entirely off the avails of
taxation, make their livelihoods biting the hands that feed them, and
undermining the moral order on which our solidarity depends.

David Warren

C Ottawa Citizen


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to