So long, Shoko

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/badguys/060919/so_long_shoko_1.htm#more
If there are terrorist playing cards, one of the aces in the deck surely
ought to bear the face of Shoko Asahara, the fanatic, half-blind guru of
Japan's Aum Shinrikyo sect. Aum, you may recall, blazed to world notoriety
in March 1995 with its rush-hour nerve gas attack on the Tokyo subway
system. The New Age cult made real the nightmare scenario that a handful of
terrorism experts had warned about for years - that an independent group,
not backed by any state, could obtain weapons of mass destruction and use
them indiscriminately against civilian targets. Aum was years ahead of al
Qaeda in its quest for WMD, and its record on this is the stuff of
nightmares.
Last Friday, after a decade in the courts, Asahara had his final appeal
rejected by Japan's Supreme Court, which upheld his death sentence for the
murder of 26 people. I doubt Asahara is long for our world. Japan not only
still has capital punishment, folks - it still has hanging, and Japan's
plump, sadistic guru could face the gallows at any time.
A one-time yoga teacher who peddled quack cures, Asahara found his calling
as founder of Aum Shinrikyo (in English, Aum Supreme Truth), a hodge-podge
of Buddhist, Hindu, and New Age religion, with heavy doses of
fire-and-brimstone Armageddon. At its peak the cult boasted as many as
40,000 followers, largely in Japan and Russia, with resources that al Qaeda
would envy: tens of millions of dollars, state-of-the-art laboratories, and
a host of young scientists with advanced degrees in chemistry, biology,
engineering, and medicine.
I was based in Tokyo at the time of the attack. With police finally on the
cult's trail, an increasingly paranoid Asahara ordered his followers onto
the subway, armed with bags of the deadly nerve agent sarin. They boarded
five trains on three lines, all converging on Kasumigaseki, the transfer
station nearest police headquarters in central Tokyo. I often changed trains
there en route to a part-time editing job, but as luck would have it, I
worked at another office that day. At the height of Monday morning rush
hour, they released the sarin by puncturing the bags with sharpened
umbrellas. The scenes that followed were unreal, giving the world its first
taste of WMD terrorism, with unprotected first responders, unprepared
hospitals, and clueless cops.
Within days, the media were reporting that suspicion centered on an obscure
New Age cult called Aum. As the weeks passed, the stories we read in the
Japanese press went from strange to incredible. Authorities and the media
were linking the cult not only to poison gas production but to a litany of
devices and crimes that seemed right out of a science-fiction novel:
biological agents, laser and particle beams, conventional explosives,
electromagnetic guns, eerie techniques for mind control, medical experiments
that belong in a horror movie, massive production of narcotics, and attempts
to both build and buy a nuclear bomb. Fascinated with what was unfolding
before us, I joined with the talented British journalist Andrew Marshall to
coauthor the first book in English on Aum, The Cult at the End of the World.
(So unsettling was the material that I vowed never to do another book on
cults.) The book is out of date these days, but key lessons from Aum's
bizarre story are not.
First, Aum remains a case study in what not to do in fighting terrorism. The
system failed at every level - police and prosecutors failed to investigate
or share information, intelligence and security officials failed to heed
warning signs, health officials and social workers failed to intervene, the
news media failed to aggressively report. (Sound familiar?) Here was a group
with chem and bio labs, conventional weapons plants, and paramilitary
training just 70 miles outside Tokyo - virtually unnoticed and unbothered
for years. To appreciate what Aum got away with, consider the scope of
crimes by its members between 1989 and 1995:
*       narcotics manufacture and sales 
*       arms smuggling 
*       firearms violations 
*       explosives violations 
*       chemical weapons use 
*       medical fraud and malpractice 
*       child abuse 
*       forgery 
*       copyright infringement 
*       consumer fraud 
*       land fraud 
*       obstruction of justice 
*       perjury 
*       harboring fugitives 
*       intimidation 
*       extortion 
*       burglary 
*       assault 
*       kidnapping 
*       attempted murder 
*       murder
All this was before the subway attack. The cult got away with so much, in
fact, it felt it could get away with almost anything - until one day the
world awoke to find that the world's busiest subway system had been nerve
gassed.
A second lesson drawn from the strange case of Aum is actually a bit of good
news. A few years after our book on Aum, I worked on a study
<http://bcsia.ksg.harvard.edu/publication.cfm?program=ISP&ctype=book&item_id
=188>  of the group with the Monterey Institute of International Studies. In
that research, I identified 20 separate attacks by Aum - 10 with biological
agents and 10 with chemical agents. All of the biological attacks failed,
and Aum's most successful chemical attack - on the Tokyo subway - killed
only 12 people. Moreover, a widely cited statistic that 5,000 people were
injured is just wrong: While 5,000 worried souls may well have flooded Tokyo
hospitals, only about 1,000 were actually injured - and many of those not
seriously. Aum's record suggests that homemade chemical and biological
weapons, while scary as hell, may be tougher to do than the media and many
terrorism experts have made out.
With that said, the third lesson is that we nonetheless were lucky. Had
Aum's members been not quite so paranoid, had they bought themselves a
little more time, chances are they would have produced more potent sarin and
better delivery devices. Aum's membership is now down to some 1,650, and the
Japanese police watch them closely. But it's not Aum that worries me today.
Consider the three key elements that made the cult a success: alienated
young people, access to high-tech tools and technology, and bungling
authorities. It's hard to believe that won't happen again.
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.  COPYING AND DISSEMINATION
IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to