Good, we'll be needing it soon.

 

Bruce

 

 

http://cbs4.com/national/topstories_story_244195631.html

 


Missile Defense System Test Successful


(AP) LOS ANGELES An interceptor missile destroyed a mock warhead over the
Pacific Ocean on Friday in a key test of the nation's missile defense
system, officials said. 

It was the most realistic test of the systems that would be used against an
attack, said Missile Defense Agency spokesman Rick Lehner.

The 54-foot interceptor shot out of an underground silo at Vandenberg Air
Force Base on the central California coast at 10:39 a.m., 17 minutes after
the mock warhead was launched from Kodiak Island, Alaska, Lehner said.

The interceptor carried a refrigerator-sized "kill vehicle" that locked on
to the approaching mock enemy missile and flew into the 4-foot-long warhead
at 18,000 mph.

Lehner said both disintegrated more than 100 miles above the Earth and a few
hundred miles west of Vandenberg. The interceptor's flight lasted 13
minutes.

The test was designed to see whether the "kill vehicle" could get close to
the warhead to test the tracking and sensor systems which would be used in
an actual missile attack.

"It gave us a good chance to measure overall system performance. It was the
most operationally realistic test we've had," Lehner said.

The interceptor was launched by remote control from a command center in
Colorado. The test also was the first use of an early warning radar at Beale
Air Force Base, Calif., to provide the data required to put the interceptor
on bna proper path toward its target.

Data from the test will take several weeks to review, Lehner said.

The $85 million launch was postponed from Thursday after fog socked in
Kodiak Island. There was also fog over Vandenberg Friday morning but it
burned off.

More than $100 billion has been spent on America's missile-defense system
since 1983 and it has been the subject of criticism by those who call it a
costly boondoggle. There also have been allegations that early tests were
rigged or their success exaggerated. The Pentagon says the technology used
in those tests is not part of the current research program.

Critics also argued early on that the demise of the Soviet Union made a
full-scale missile attack on the U.S. unlikely. Supporters say the U.S.
still is vulnerable to missiles from rogue states.

In July, North Korea unsuccessfully test-fired a missile that was believed
capable of reaching the northwestern U.S. coast.

On Monday, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld visited Fort Greely in
Alaska, where 11 interceptors are kept.

Asked whether the missile shield was ready for use against a North Korean
missile, Rumsfeld said he would not be fully convinced without more
realistic testing.

"A full end-to-end" demonstration is needed "where we actually put all the
pieces" of the highly complex and far-flung system together, he said.

There have been nine intercept tests since 1999, and five were successful in
hitting the target, Lehner said. An actual intercept test was scheduled for
the end of this year or in early 2007, he said. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to