http://www.iwpr.net/?p=rca
<http://www.iwpr.net/?p=rca&s=f&o=325860&apc_state=henprca>
&s=f&o=325860&apc_state=henprca

 


Are Islamic Militants Regrouping in the Fergana Valley?


Violent incidents in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan seem to be symptoms of
instability rather than a new wave of organised Islamic militancy.

By Dadodjan Azimov in London (RCA No. 473, 1-Dec-06)

A spate of violent incidents in the Fergana Valley this year has sparked
concern that militant Islamic groups are undergoing a resurgence. The
violence, focusing on the Tajik-Kyrgyz border region, has been cited by
officials as proof that the paramilitary Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan is
back in action and the banned Hizb-ut-Tahrir group has taken up arms.

However, Central Asian analysts interviewed by IWPR say the picture is less
clear-cut, and that sporadic armed clashes between suspected militants and
the security forces do not add up to a coordinated campaign by a resurgent
guerrilla grouping. 

In addition, they say, to simply blame the obvious culprits - the IMU and
Hizb-ut-Tahrir - is to oversimplify a complex picture made up of armed
groups, economic problems and poor government. 

TURBULENT REGIONAL BACKDROP 

The incidents include a prison break, clashes between armed men and security
forces on both sides of the Kyrgyz-Tajik border, and the killing of a
prominent Muslim cleric in southern Kyrgyzstan. In some cases the militants
deliberately staged the attacks, in others gunfire was exchanged as a result
of raids conducted by the security services. 

Commentators note that these outbreaks of violence come in the wake of two
major events that reverberated around the region last year, and many see a
direct connection. Weeks of demonstrations in Kyrgyzstan culminated in the
popular uprising of March 24 which ousted the government of President Askar
Akaev and led to prolonged political instability. 

A month and a half later, on May 13, Uzbek security forces used live fire to
break up a demonstration in Andijan, killing hundreds and forcing many
residents to flee to neighbouring Kyrgyzstan. 

The shock waves of Andijan, coupled with the undercurrent of tension in
Kyrgyzstan, created an environment in which militancy could thrive.

"The Fergana Valley is a single ethno-cultural region, and events in Andijan
obviously increased tensions in neighbouring Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan,"
said Igor Rotar, adding that that another important factor was "the legal
vacuum that emerged in post-revolutionary Kyrgyzstan."

Most of the valley lies within Uzbekistan, and has been the heartland of
Islamic resistance to President Islam Karimov's regime over the past 15
years. Waves of arrests over that period, first of prominent clerics, then
their supporters, then suspected IMU supporters, and more recently real or
alleged members of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, have kept the situation more or less
under control through repressive measures. 

Many analysts argue that the Uzbek policy has been counterproductive,
generating hostility to the regime rather than laying the foundations for
true stability. 

"In the short term it has been very successful in terms of preventing any
further violence in Uzbekistan," said a western analyst in Tashkent who
asked to remain anonymous, referring specifically to Uzbek government
tactics since Andijan. "The recent sacking of the hokim [governor] of
Andijan and the president's comments confirm, however, that until social
conditions improve, and other outlets of protest are allowed, Islamic
radicalism may remain the only means for people to express their
frustrations." 

The Andijan protests were sparked by a trial of local men accused of being
part of a different and little-known group identified as "Akromia". It is
not clear whether such a group actually existed, as there was little
independent proof available apart from that provided by prosecutors in a
notoriously flawed judicial system. 

INCIDENTS CLEARLY INTERCONNECTED 

The continuing high level of control exerted by security forces in
Uzbekistan means, paradoxically, that violent incidents are focused just
outside its borders. The authorities in both Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan have
expressed concern at what they see as a resurgence in Islamic militant
activity in their respective parts of the Fergana valley. 

The biggest of several related incidents occurred in May, when armed men
raided a Tajik frontier post on the border with Kyrgyzstan. After plundering
guns, the group forced its way into the Batken region in Kyrgyz territory,
where the military deployed hundreds of troops to pursue them. The fighting
left three Tajik border guards and six Kyrgyz soldiers and customs officers
dead. Four attackers were killed and one was captured.

The identity of the armed group was unclear, although officials suggested
links both with Hizb-ut-Tahrir and the IMU, whose guerrillas were active in
Batken in 1999-2001.

The Kyrgyz authorities subsequently made a number of arrests, and said they
had "indisputable evidence" that the detainees were Hizb-ut-Tahrir members. 

In October, three men including an Uzbekistan national were sentenced to
death for the raid, two others were given ten years in prison and a woman
was given a suspended sentence. Kyrgyzstan has introduced a moratorium on
the death penalty, so the men are not in imminent danger of execution. 

The Tajik authorities suggested the raid was carried out by some of the same
individuals who attacked a prison in the town of Kairakkum in January,
freeing a man who was facing charges of arms possession and links to
"illegal armed groups".

Towards the end of the summer, the Kyrgyz security forces embarked on a
security clampdown in the south of the country, both as a direct response to
the May clashes and because they said they had intelligence indicating that
insurgents were making plans to cross from Tajikistan. 

In the course of one such operation, a man accused of being a leading IMU
figure, Rasul Akhun, died in early September following a firefight with
Kyrgyz police in the city of Osh. The National Security Committee said he
too was linked to the May raid. 

A month earlier, a leading cleric called Rafiq Qori Kamoluddin was shot dead
along with two other men. The authorities claimed he had IMU links, but
friends and relatives denied this. The cleric was based in the town of
Karasuu right on the border with Uzbekistan, and reportedly commanded a lot
of respect among local Muslims. 

Significantly, this operation involved Uzbek as well as Kyrgyz security
officers. President Kurmanbek Bakiev's policy of close cooperation with
Uzbekistan on security and counter-terrorism is designed to fend off
criticisms from Tashkent that the more liberal administration in Kyrgyzstan
has not done enough to clamp down on political Islam.

THE USUAL SUSPECTS?

The Andijan crackdown contributed to creating an environment conducive to
instability in the wider Fergana Valley region, although in the Kyrgyz part
of the valley there are also domestic political causes that cannot be
discounted, either. 

"Tashkent's repressions [after Andijan] have been forcing radical Muslims to
seek refuge in neighbouring areas of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan," said Rotar.

The Tashkent-based western analyst added, "I think the refugee flow from
Andijan. probably contributed some individuals to those organising in both
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, and the general crackdown maybe strengthened the
resolve of the most hardened, though at the same time it warned off those
who were only loosely connected to these movements." 

Inside Uzbekistan, he said, Islamic militancy has probably not been
eradicated, but it has been "driven even further underground and [is] maybe
smaller in size, but more hardened and desperate enough to carry out further
attacks".

What remains unclear whether the IMU or Hizb-ut-Tahrir as organisations are
active in Kyrgyz and Tajik areas of the Fergana valley, and whether either
group - or perhaps a different one - is building up the capacity to mount
more sustained guerrilla actions. 

Governments in the region say they are. "These border incidents are a
consequence of activity by religious movements," said Jolbars Jorabekov,
head of the Kyrgyz government agency for religious affairs. "The situation
in Kyrgyzstan is extremely unstable. Religious movements become visible at
such times, when there is unrest. If the situation is stabilised, these
groups too will decline." 

In Jorabekov's view, the most likely suspect is a more radical version of
Hizb-ut-Tahrir. The party, originally of Middle Eastern origin, gained a
foothold in Uzbekistan and subsequently spread to neighbouring Central Asian
states in the late Nineties. It survives despite being banned and having its
members arrested across the region, especially in Uzbekistan where the
number of detentions runs into the thousands. 

Although it calls for the overthrow of regional governments, Hizb-ut-Tahrir
literature calls for peaceful action. But officials like Jorabekov talk of
an "extremist wing of Hizb-ut-Tahrir" that may now support violence. 

"Their approach is now completely different," he said. "Five years ago they
were more inclined to engage in proselytising, whereas now they are more
hard-line, more extreme." 

Commenting on the May attacks, Batken regional prosecutor Ryskul Baktybaev
said in July that it was clear that Hizb-ut-Tahrir was no longer the
"peace-loving organisation" of the early Nineties when it first appeared in
Central Asia, and that followers were involved with other extremist Islamic
groups. "There is a direct link between members of Hizb-ut-Tahrir and the
IMU," he said.

Other analysts accept that there may have been some crossover between
Hizb-ut-Tahrir and other groups, but insist this does not mean a formal
merger. 

"It's possible that some radical members of Hizb-ut-Tahrir have joined the
IMU," said Sanobar Shermatova, a Moscow-based journalist and Central Asian
expert. But she insisted, "I don't believe Hizb-ut-Tahrir is taking part in
arranging acts of terrorism."

Sadikjan Mahmudov, a lawyer with the Osh-based human rights group Ray of
Solomon who has defended Hizb-ut-Tahrir members in the past, does not think
they were involved in the recent violence, "I am confident that they will
never shift from their peaceful strategy and raise their hand against anyone
in pursuit of their political agenda."

Observers believe that the IMU and Hizb-ut-Tahrir are so different in their
roots and aims that they would find it almost impossible to agree a common
strategy.

Vitaly Ponamaryov, a Central Asia expert with the Moscow-based Human Rights
group Memorial, said, "Hizb ut Tahrir is not a local group, but an
international organisation with its own traditions and strategy which has
existed over many years. 

"All this talk of the two groups joining forces is being put about by the
Uzbek and Kyrgyz secret services. I don't believe there is hard evidence
that the two [IMU and Hizb-ut-Tahrir] are coming together."

As for the culprits in the May raid and related violence, Ponomarev said,
"The allegiances of this group are problematic.. In the past we seen a lot
of cases where the authorities manipulated the identity of the groups
[involved] without providing strong enough proof." 

IMU SEEN AS SPENT FORCE 

What about the IMU itself? The guerrilla group mounted annual insurgent
raids into Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan in 1999-2001, but these stopped after
IMU fighters based in northern Afghanistan were defeated and dispersed along
with their Taleban allies in the United States-led coalition assault. 

After the IMU's military leader Juma Namangani was reported killed in this
fighting, political leader Tohir Yoldash is believed to be in charge of IMU
remnants allied with al-Qaeda and the Taleban, and hiding out in lawless
border areas of Pakistan.

The IMU has its roots in a Muslim group called Adolat that operated in the
Uzbek city of Namangan in the early Nineties. After the authorities clamped
down on it, many members fled the country, joining Islamist guerrillas
fighting the government in Tajikistan's civil war, and later teaming up with
the Taleban. 

Shermatova believes any IMU members still remaining in Central Asia would
find it hard to regroup. "Small groups do exist in Tajikistan and
Kyrgyzstan, who are unable to go back to Uzbekistan. But they have no future
as they don't represent a large, cohesive force with clear plans," she said.
"These groups engage in minor robbery and they don't have a clear political
agenda."

She concluded, "I do not consider that the IMU has any chance of undergoing
a revival so that it reaches the scale it operated on in 1999-2000.. The
fact that there are individuals but that they aren't conducting big
operations is further proof of how weak the IMU has become."

Sadikjan Kamaluddin, the head of the Centre for Islamic Cooperation in
Kyrgyzstan, agreed that many of the armed men described as Islamic militants
were in fact engaged in crime - specifically drug smuggling. The part of the
Fergana Valley which has seen recent violence lies on the route for
trafficking Afghan-made heroin north to Russia and European markets.

"You shouldn't think that because the IMU [people] are citing Islam, they
are really acting in pursuit of Islam. In reality they are involved in
trafficking drugs. Islam is just a cover." 

ISLAMIC GROUPS FIGHTING PROPAGANDA WAR 

Ponomaryov pointed out that one reason why the IMU has stirred renewed
concerns in Central Asia is simply that it is becoming more proficient at
public relations - even without a strong organisation on the ground. 

IMU leader Yoldosh sent an audio recording to the BBC, RFE/RL and other
outlets to celebrate the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States,
and promised to "punish" the Uzbek, Tajik and Kyrgyz presidents for clamping
down on Islamic groups. 

Yoldosh also put out a video message - widely available in southern
Kyrgyzstan, as Ponomarev attests - in which he devoted a considerable amount
of time to attacking Hizb-ut-Tahrir. 

According to Ponomarev, "Radical Islamic groups are becoming more active -
only in terms of their propaganda. They are busily distributing material.
[because of] a change in technology. With the advent on the [Central Asian]
market of cheap video and audio equipment from China, Islamic radical groups
are using these technologies to distribute videos, so that leafleting is
slowly becoming a thing of the past."

TOUGH GOVERNMENT AND UNDERLYING POVERTY 

Although bad governance and chronic social and economic problems in the
Fergana Valley, a particularly poor region of Central Asia, are not the only
reason why Islamic radicalism has strong roots here, many commentators argue
that they are certainly a contributory factor. 

As Jurabekov of the Kyrgyz government agency for religious affairs pointed
out, "The Fergana valley is the most densely populated region in the world.
The paucity of land and social problems provide fertile ground for religious
extremism to emerge." 

Like many other analysts, Shermatova believes the persistence of groups of
IMU remnants and others is a symptom of instability rather than its cause.
"The real problem is not the Islamic groups, but broader issues," she said,
listing these as the porous borders in the region, the often difficult
relationship between the Tajik and Uzbek governments, and the troubled
situation in southern Kyrgyzstan, which manifests itself in the form of
crime and corruption. 

One problem is that the heavy-handed tactics employed to round up suspected
militants may be counterproductive. This is a particular problem for
Kyrgyzstan, where strong-arm methods are a recent innovation.

"Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan recently signed an agreement to work together on
counter-terrorism. This coordination leaves no space for the IMU to operate
in, but the methods employed by the security services often go beyond [what
is allowed by] the legal framework," said Shermatova. 

Ponamarev took the same view, saying, "I think the Bakiev government has
embarked on a very dangerous path. It's not just persecution; I have spoken
to people who suffered in the counter-terrorism operations carried out by
the security agencies in southern Kyrgyzstan, and there are hundreds of
them. I talked to people who were detained without an arrest warrant, whose
homes were raided and who suffered losses. 

"This creates a tense situation, and could push various Islamic groups
towards radicalisation - specifically new ones that might emerge from the
grassroots."

Across the border in Uzbekistan, things might be quieter for now - but
Alisher Ilhomov, a Central Asian expert at London's School of Oriental and
African Studies, says unrest in Uzbekistan - including that in Andijan - was
driven by economic concerns, not religious sentiment. And these underlying
causes are persistent. 

"There has been a string of protests caused by mounting pressure from the
government, which wants to increase its grip on small and medium-sided
businesses, and from the tax authorities," he said.

Ilhomov said another concern was the Uzbek government's attempt to stop its
citizens travelling to neighbouring countries and discovering there are
other ways of running a country. "It's about tightening controls on the
borders and inside the country, and keeping people afraid so that they keep
their mouths shut. It's also about Islam Karimov's own fears." 

Lastly, there are the troubled diplomatic relationships between regional
states to consider. Although all these governments are hostile to the IMU
and Hizb-ut-Tahrir, they have not always seen eye to eye on where the fault
for the militancy lies. The IMU and Hizb-ut-Tahrir both sprang originally
from Uzbekistan, but when the former began mounting attacks on Kyrgyz and
Uzbek territory from Tajikistan from the end of the Nineties, Tashkent
blamed its neighbours - Kyrgyzstan for failing to repel the attackers, and
Tajikistan for allowing them to roam around mountain areas apparently
unhindered. 

"There is a lot of politics behind the various reports of IMU activity,"
said the western analyst in Tashkent. "The regime in Uzbekistan is concerned
to portray the IMU as an external threat rather than a factor of internal
politics, and so they like to emphasise the way in which Tajikistan is
complicit in its reemergence and Kyrgyzstan not doing enough to control its
territory." 

Regional governments now appear more closely aligned on security if nothing
else, not least because after Andijan, Uzbekistan drifted back towards the
Russian fold, making it easier for the Kyrgyz and Tajiks to interact with it
through post-Soviet regional groupings like the Collective Security Treaty
Organisation. 

Such coordination may make it easier to police remote regions and deploy
military forces when needed to counter armed insurgents or criminals. But
dealing with armed bands of men roaming the countryside - as on the
Tajik-Kyrgyz border this May - is one thing, and policing urban areas so
that order is maintained, and real militants are arrested without the
overwhelmingly Muslim population being alienated, is another.

The question remains whether tough action like the joint Kyrgyz-Uzbek
security sweeps conducted in recent months is productive. As Rotar said,
"Innocent people often get arrested. Torture is used during interrogations.
That can increase radicalisation." 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to