http://www.frontpag
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25853>
emag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25853 

 

Coming to a Neighborhood Near You: The Axis of Evil
By Kenneth R. <http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/authors.asp?ID=1021>
Timmerman
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 8, 2006

The unsurprising victory of Venezuelan song and dance artist Hugo Chavez in
his re-election bid on Sunday was warmly welcomed around the world. 

 

Chavez friends in Cuba, Bolivia and Nicaragua were pleased. Castro and
Daniel Ortega must think someone flipped a switch and they're back in the
early 1980s - only this time, there's no President Reagan and no Contras.

 

The Iranian Foreign ministry welcomed the Chavez victory, and didn't even
threaten to raise oil prices to $200 per barrel. That's for next week.

 

Al Jazeera knew the results even before the votes were cast, and showed
<http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/C2DABF76-A212-4632-A111-44F5538C7670
.htm>  Chavez with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Iran earlier this year, rigged out
in orange hard hats, the best of buddies.

 

"If the North American empire and its lackeys attempt another coup, or don't
acknowledge the electoral outcome, we will not send them one more drop of
oil," al Jazeera quoted al Jefe as saying.

 

Oil is mainly what distinguishes Chavez from his mentor, Fidel Castro.
Venezuela is the world's fifth-largest oil exporter, and supplies the U.S.
with about 11 percent of our daily oil supplies. And Chavez controls the
oil.

 

Instead of inviting the children to spend their summer holiday cutting sugar
cane, as Fidel did in the 1960s, al Jefe is offering sugar plums to the poor
via his wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, CITGO, which controls 6% of all U.S.
refining capacity.

 

In July, Chavez had CITGO break existing distribution agreements with 1,800
independently owned service stations in ten predominantly red states,
because he reportedly
<http://www.scottallan.com/2006/08/chavez-owns-citgo.html>  wanted to break
contracts "that benefit U.S. consumers more than Venezuelans."

 

Now he is offering to supply discounted heating oil to "the poor" in several
U.S. states as a public relations ploy. Even
<http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-01-11-citgo-cover-usat
_x.htm>  USA Today is asking if Citgo is no longer an oil company, but a
"political tool" for Chavez.

 

The Citgo offer of discounted fuel has won support from unexpected circles.
On Friday, the parent company of the conservative Washington Times will be
hosting
<http://www.citizensforumonline.com/TheForums/index.php?ContentID=2006020916
5022-21975>  Venezeuan ambassador Hernando Alverez Herrera to a "citizens
forum," where he will expound on Chavez's kind and generous offer to supply
discounted fuel to the poor.

 

As a daily reader of the Times (and a former senior writer for Insight
Magazine, an investigative newsweekly closed by the Times last year), I was
surprised to learn that Herrera would be a featured speaker at a Washington
Times event.

 

I was even more surprised when the spokesman for the Citizens Forum, Brian
Bauman, told me that he was planning to allow Herrera to speak unchallenged
by any panelist who would focus on Venezuela's strategic ties to Iran, a
founding member of the axis of evil ."That's not the direction of this
forum," he said. "It's to speak to the cost of energy in the Washington, DC
area. One facet of that is the Venezuelan program."

 

Come hither, Little One, said the Crocodile.

 

Venezuela under Chavez ressembles Castro's Cuba in important ways. Just as
Castro did after he seized power, Chavez has sought to expand his influence
throughout the region through covert action. He bankrolled Ortega's return
to power last month, and has helped leftist leaders win power in Bolivia and
elsewhere.

 

Also like Castro, he has sought the protection of a powerful opponent of the
United States, in this case the Islamic Republic of Iran.

 

Castro was powerless to prevent Nikita Krushchev from deploying
nuclear-tipped missiles to Cuba, an act that nearly provoked a nuclear war
between the United States and the Soviet Union. And Kruschhev was no radical
Islamic fundamentalist. He was rational to the extreme, believing in the
cold calculus of power politics.

 

Ahmadinejad has stated publicly that the goal of his government is to bring
about the return of the Imam Mahdi, the 12
<http://www.kentimmerman.com/2006_01_11nuclear-zealot.htm> th imam of Shiite
Muslim lore who only comes out of his well after a devastating world war.

 

Unlike Krushchev, who understood that he and his regime were doomed if
nuclear missiles actually began to fly, Ahmadinejad believes that through
death, he wins.

 

It's hard to deter such a regime.

 

Iran does not currently have nuclear warheads - at least, so far as the CIA
professes to know. But they do have missiles which, if deployed in
Venezuela, would be capable of hitting the United States.

 

But it goes against the pattern of Iranian regime behavior to act so overtly
against the United States. Tehran's mullahs prefer acting by indirection,
through proxies, just as they are murdering Americans today in Iraq through
proxies.

 

Suppose for a moment that Iran has acquired a nuclear weapon - either on the
black market, as many sources believe; or through a clandestine uranium
enrichment program, which the CIA discounts (because they have no spies in
Iran who might detect such a program).

 

Iran could send a heavily-shielded nuclear warhead to Venezuela, where it
would be fitted to a short-range missile and stowed on board a U.S.-bound
cargo ship.

 

That cargo ship would not be owned by Iranians or by Venezuelans, but
perhaps by some Qatari millionaire through a front company in the British
Virgin Islands. The deadly ship would then depart Venezuela carrying
perfectly legitimate, declared cargo for the port of Newark, New Jersey.

 

Perhaps the ship might not even be bound for the United States at all, but
for Halifax, Nova Scotia, further up the Atlantic seaboard. Either way, the
likelihood it would be inspected on the high seas are very low.

 

Steaming along in commercial shipping lanes one hundred miles off the coast
of Washington, DC, the ship's international crew brings the missile launcher
up from the hold and prepares it for launch. Under the cover of darkness,
they fire their weapon, then stow the launcher and continue on their way.
Two minutes later, Washington, DC is hit with a fireball that obliterates
the White House, the Capitol Building, and the national monuments in
seconds. And no signature links this act of war back to Iran.

 

This, of course, is just fiction. But the technology is known and available.
Iran has been testing sea-launched ballistic missiles since 1998.

 

Well before any kind of military strike on America, both Iran and Venezuela
are working to get America to surrender, by first admitting our
helplessness.

 

That is why Chavez is offering discounted oil through Citgo to Americans.
You are poor, you are weak, and your government won't take care of you. But
we will, if only you will accept our gift.

 

That is why Iran is trying to get the United States to accept its help in
Iraq, and is working through proxies in America (since it has no legal
equivalent of Citgo) to get its seductive offer across. We will stop the
insurgency, Iran says, if only you will recognize the legitimacy of our
regime, accept our nuclear program, and stop all efforts to support
pro-democracy movements inside Iran. We can keep Americans from getting
killed.

 

"Come hither, Little One," said the Crocodile, "and I'll whisper."

 

In Rudyard Kipling's Just So Stories, the Elephant's Child is tempted by his
'satiable curtiosity' to seek out the Crocodile, and cannot believe the
beast will actually try to eat him. As the Elephant's Child pulls and pulls
to free his nose from the Crocodile's teeth, it grows and grows - and that
is How the Elephant got its Trunk.

 

We won't get off so easily.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to