http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/in_our_opinion/From-Winsto
n-Churchill-Kofi-Annan-Still-Believe-in-Darwinism.htm

 

>From Winston Churchill to Kofi Annan: Still Believe in Darwinism? 

In 1946, Winston Churchill gave his heroic "Iron Curtain" speech in
Missouri. This week, sixty years later, United Nations Secretary-General
Kofi Annan delivered his own speech in Independence, Missouri. 

Whereas Churchill used his Missouri speech to praise American supremacy and
moral leadership, Annan used his Missouri speech to lambaste America for
that same supremacy. The contrast in wisdom, bravery and clarity could
scarcely be more stark. 

Still believe in Darwinism? 

In Churchill's words, the world could sleep securely with the knowledge that
America transcended other military powers and possessed an atomic monopoly: 

"The United States stands at this time at the pinnacle of world power... No
one country has slept less well in their beds because [atomic] knowledge,
and the method and the raw materials to apply it, are presently retained in
American hands... We should possess so formidable a superiority as to impose
effective deterrents upon its employment, or threat of employment, by
others." 

Annan, on the other hand, lamented American preeminence: 

"None of our global institutions can accomplish much when the U.S. remains
aloof... Security must be collective and indivisible... No nation can make
itself secure by seeking supremacy over all others... We all have to
recognize, no matter how great our strength, that we must deny ourselves the
license to do always as we please..." 

Even more dramatically, Churchill's crystal-clear exceptionalism and Annan's
muddled collectivism differ. According to Churchill, America and Britain
provide a unique example for the world: 

"We cannot be blind to the fact that the liberties enjoyed by individual
citizens throughout the United States and throughout the British Empire are
not valid in a considerable number of countries... We must never cease to
proclaim in fearless tones the great principles of freedom and the rights of
man, which are the joint inheritance of the English-speaking world, and
which through the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial
by jury, and the English Common Law find their most famous expression in the
American Declaration of Independence... This is a special relationship
between the British Commonwealth and Empire and the United States of
America... If there is to be a fraternal association of the kind that I have
described, with all the strength and security which both of our countries
can derive from it, let us make sure that great fact is known to the world,
and that it plays its part in steadying and stabilizing the foundations of
peace." 

In contrast, Annan demanded equalization and collectivization, through which
America must bow to pedestrian nations: 

"Governments must be accountable for their actions in the international
arena, as well as in the domestic one... As things stand, accountability
between states is highly skewed. Poor and weak states are easily held to
account, because they need assistance. But large and powerful states, whose
actions have the greatest impact on others, can be constrained only by their
own people, working through their domestic institutions... And that makes it
very important to organize those institutions in a fair and democratic way,
giving the poor and weak some influence over the actions of the rich and the
strong... New members should be added [to the Security Council], on a
permanent or long-term basis, to give greater representation to parts of the
world which have limited voice today." 

In other words, according to Annan, the United States should be even more
accountable to the collective of anti-Semitic, anti-democratic minions,
including Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, North Korea's Kim Jong Il and Cuba's
Castro brothers. 

Just as remarkably, Churchill bravely forewarned that free nations must
challenge the growing Communist menace with strength and vigilance, not
weakness and appeasement. These words are no less inspiring today: 

"From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has
descended across the Continent... The Communist parties or fifth columns
constitute a growing challenge and peril to Christian civilization... But we
should be most unwise not to face them squarely while time remains... I have
felt bound to portray the shadow which, alike in the West and in the East,
falls upon the world... Our difficulties and dangers will not be removed by
closing our eyes to them. They will not be removed by mere waiting to see
what happens. Nor will they be removed by a policy of appeasement. What is
needed is a settlement, and the longer this is delayed, the more difficult
it will be, and the greater our dangers will become. I am convinced that
there is nothing for which they have less respect than for weakness,
especially military weakness. For that reason, the old doctrine of balance
of power is unsound. We cannot afford, if we can help it, to work on narrow
margins, offering temptations to a trial of strength. If the Western
democracies stand together in strict adherence to these principles, no one
is likely to molest them. If, however, they become divided or falter in
their duty, and if these all-important years are allowed to slip away, then
indeed catastrophe may overwhelm us all. Last time I saw it all coming, and
I cried aloud to my own fellow countrymen and to the world, but no one paid
any attention." 

In bleak contrast, Annan concluded with gratuitous paeans to global-warming
alarmism, and took one final cheap shot at President Bush: 

"We must do more, and urgently, to prevent or slow down climate change...
When [America] appears to abandon its own ideals and objectives, its friends
abroad are naturally troubled and confused... When power, especially
military force, is used, the world will consider it legitimate only when
convinced that it is being used for the right purpose - for broadly-shared
aims - in accordance with broadly-accepted norms... More than ever, today
Americans, like the rest of humanity, need a functioning global system
through which the world's peoples can face global challenges together. And
in order to function, the system still cries out for far-sighted American
leadership in the Truman tradition. I hope and pray that the American
leaders of today, and tomorrow, will provide it." 

Given the U.N.'s corruption and inaction in the face of tyranny, Annan's
words constitute the height of hypocrisy. What a difference sixty years
makes. 

  _____  

[Posted December 14, 2006 ] 

Return
<http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/index_commentary.htm>  to
Current
<http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/index_commentary.htm>
Events Index
<http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/index_commentary.htm> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to