http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21044648-5006029,00.html

 

The great battle against terrorism

WE need to be clear about what is at stake in Iraq.

What is at stake is Iraq's future and our future. 

Our enemies in Iraq deliberately create bloodshed and chaos. 

They hope to drive the Iraqi Government and coalition supporters towards
surrender. 

Then they would be free to establish Iraq as a strategic base for extremist
Islamist ideology and global terrorism. 

Such a defeat would make the world manifestly less safe and shift the
extremist battleground even closer to our own homes. 

As President George W. Bush has said, this is the decisive ideological
struggle of our time. 

For that reason and for their own interests, Iraq's people deserve our
support. They have embraced democracy and are striving against fierce
resistance to bring order to their country. 

This struggle for a secure and free country has demanded great sacrifice and
we must not abandon the Iraqis now. 

That's why the new strategy announced yesterday by President Bush makes
sense; it will give Iraqis the best chance to build on positive trends. 

It gives them a chance at victory. 

The Iraqi army is making real progress training new recruits and taking
charge. More than 300,000 members have now been trained and equipped. 

A new, independent media continues to grow, in defiance of those who want to
silence free speech. 

Courts are functioning and more judges are being trained. Policing is being
reformed to better uphold the rule of law. 

These may seem like basic steps, but for a people who face violent threats
each day, they are remarkable achievements towards stability. 

The enemies of stability in Iraq are terrorists, insurgents, Saddam Hussein
loyalists and those committed to sectarian violence. 

These groups do not want Iraq to succeed. They are waging selfish battles
and have no regard for the plight of the majority. 

They are callously deliberate in their attempts to foment divisions and
incite tit-for-tat reprisals. 

Baghdad and al Anbar province are the crucibles in the struggle for Iraq's
future. Al-Qaida Iraq is based in Anbar province and 80 per cent of
sectarian violence takes place within 50km of Baghdad. 

In Baghdad, we know that when Iraqi and coalition forces operate in the
city's neighbourhoods, violence is reduced. 

The presence of Iraqi and US troops provides security that enables people to
get on with their lives. 

The new strategy recognises the need to clear neighbourhoods of
troublemakers, maintain security and, eventually, build on the quality of
life. 

This strategy begins with military action, but that alone will not guarantee


success. Domestic political and economic reforms are essential. The
government of Iraq must re-commit to improving services and be seen to be
even handed. 

The government must implement promises in areas such as oil revenue
distribution, enabling provincial elections and pursuing reconciliation
between communities. 

In areas that are relatively secure, there must be renewed efforts to create
jobs, especially for youth. 

Regional support is also important. Neighbouring states must show their
support for Iraq by preventing foreign meddling that only exacerbates the
strife. 

Iran and Syria have to show they are willing to play a constructive role in
the region. 

In all of this, the role of coalition forces is to support Iraqis so they
can take complete charge in controlling their country. 

We face hard choices. Our hopes for success rest on bringing security to the
Iraqi population and confronting the sectarian violence. 

The consequences of failure would be catastrophic. 

If the Iraqi people, supported by the coalition, fail to defeat our enemies
in Iraq, it will be a huge victory for extremists around the world. 

Terrorists will be emboldened in the Middle East and in our own region. 

Al-Qaida in Iraq has declared its intention to establish a Taliban-style
caliphate in Iraq, then expand it widely. 

Such a regime would subjugate women, forbid the education of girls, ban
music and basic technology and execute dissenters. 

For those who question the new strategy there is a simple question; what is
the alternative? 

The Australian Labor Party is almost alone in the world in arguing for
surrender. 

If Labor's retreat happened, what would be the consequences for the Iraqi
people, for stability in the Middle East and for terrorism in our region? 

To give up now would disregard all the sacrifices that Iraqi and coalition
forces have made so far. 

That's why the renewed effort to build security is essential. 

This strategy will only have a chance if the Iraqis are confident that they
will continue to have our full support until they are able to take charge
themselves. 

The United States, once again, is prepared to take on a greater burden in
the interests of the free world. 

We appreciate their courage and commitment and offer continuing strategic
support. 

The price of defeat for Iraq, the region and the world is too high to bear.

ALEXANDER DOWNER is Australia's Foreign Affairs Minister



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to