http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/17/world/middleeast/17quds.html?ref=world

February 17, 2007
Iranian Force, Focus of U.S., Still a Mystery
By SCOTT SHANE

WASHINGTON, Feb. 16 — Like so much else about the Iranian state, the 
Quds Force, which conducts overseas operations for Iran’s Islamic 
Revolutionary Guard Corps, remains remarkably mysterious even to those 
who closely study the country.

The Quds Force is under intense scrutiny by American intelligence 
agencies because it is suspected of supplying sophisticated explosives 
to Iraqi militants. Among those detained in recent American raids on 
Iranian offices in Iraq were several Iranians identified by the United 
States military as Quds operatives, including a diplomat said to be the 
No. 2 official in the Quds Force.

Questions about what exactly Quds Force officers have done and whether 
they acted at the direction of the Iranian leadership have taken on 
particular urgency as the Bush administration sends more troops to damp 
the violence in Baghdad. But the competing power centers inside the 
Iranian government, and the intense secrecy that obscures decision 
making, make answers elusive.

“We know that the Quds Force is involved,” Defense Secretary Robert M. 
Gates told reporters on Thursday. “We know the Quds Force is a 
paramilitary arm of the I.R.G.C.,” he added, using the abbreviation for 
the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

“So we assume that the leadership of the I.R.G.C. knows about this,” Mr. 
Gates said. “Whether or not more senior political leaders in Iran know 
about it, we don’t know.”

Most independent experts say it is only logical to assume that Iran 
deployed large numbers of operatives in Iraq as soon as Saddam Hussein 
was ousted in 2003. Many of Iraq’s Shiite clerics, politicians and 
militia leaders have close ties to Iran, where some spent years in exile 
while Mr. Hussein and the Sunnis of his Baath Party ruled Iraq.

And the past role of the Quds Force as the long arm of the Islamic 
revolution abroad, performing a mix of military, intelligence and 
training operations, has been widely reported in past conflicts like 
those in Lebanon and Bosnia. Its name, the Arabic word for Jerusalem, 
symbolizes the Iranian government’s commitment to driving Israelis out 
of the occupied Palestinian territories.

The Quds Force “is the handpicked elite of an already elite ideological 
army,” said Abbas Milani, director of Iranian studies at Stanford 
University.

As part of the Revolutionary Guard, the force officially answers to the 
supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and not the Iranian 
president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, though Mr. Ahmadinejad is believed to 
have personal ties to many senior guard officials.

But the Quds Force is cloaked in secrecy inside Iran and is the subject 
of considerable guesswork from scholars in the United States, who in 
interviews this week offered estimates of its size ranging from 3,000 to 
50,000 men. The true number, along with details of the strength and 
budget of the entire Revolutionary Guard, is hidden even from the 
Iranian Parliament, said Mr. Milani, according to legislators he has 
spoken with.

Some specialists even question whether the Quds Force exists as a formal 
unit clearly delineated from the rest of the Revolutionary Guard.

“It could be that anyone with an intelligence role in the Revolutionary 
Guard is just called Quds,” said Vali R. Nasr, who studies Iran and 
political Islam at the Naval Postgraduate School.

Whether properly identified as part of the Quds Force or not, members of 
the Revolutionary Guard mobilized intelligence and paramilitary agents 
in Lebanon in the 1980s, where they trained the Shiite militia 
Hezbollah; in Afghanistan, during the anti-Soviet jihad in the 1980s and 
episodically since then; in the former Yugoslavia, supporting the 
Bosnian Muslims against Serbian forces; and in other trouble spots.

The guard has also been accused of supporting terrorist attacks outside 
Iran, notably the 1996 truck bomb attack on the Khobar Towers complex in 
Saudi Arabia that killed 19 American service members. In December, a 
federal judge ruled that the government of Iran bore responsibility for 
the Khobar Towers attack and ordered Tehran to pay survivors of those 
killed more than $253 million.

The Revolutionary Guard was created after the Islamic revolution that 
overthrew the shah in 1979. The government of Ayatollah Ruhollah 
Khomeini did not trust the existing Iranian military, where support for 
the monarchy remained strong. The new rulers established the guard as a 
parallel military force, recruited from among the revolution’s most 
devout religious supporters.

In the past 25 years, the Revolutionary Guard, whose strength is 
estimated by Western specialists at 125,000 to 300,000, has gradually 
evolved into more of a conventional military and has become deeply 
involved in lucrative business enterprises inside and outside Iran. But 
all along, it has conducted overseas operations, both covert and overt, 
often under the Quds Force name.

The actions of the Quds Force are not necessarily ordered by Ayatollah 
Khamenei, and the supreme leader may not even get reports of all its 
actions, said Hooshang Amirahmadi, director of the Center for Middle 
Eastern Studies at Rutgers University. “The Iranian government is a very 
loose grouping of power centers,” blurring lines of control and 
authority, he said.

There have been past instances of actions by rogue intelligence officers 
that the Iranian government has disavowed. In 1999, for example, Iran’s 
Intelligence Ministry blamed rogue officers for the killings of five 
prominent critics of the government’s conservative wing.

But Mr. Amirahmadi said he did not think the Iranian leadership should 
be allowed to sidestep responsibility for actions by its operatives in 
Iraq. “The Bush administration can’t say, ‘We have a C.I.A., but we 
don’t control it,’ ” he said, adding that the same rules should apply to 
Tehran.

Though the American allegations about the Quds Force have received 
attention from administration officials and the media only in recent 
weeks, they are not new. On several occasions over the last year, senior 
Pentagon officials have spoken publicly about the Iranian role in Iraq.

More recently, Bush administration officials have engaged in a balancing 
act, engaging in harsher rhetoric about Iranian actions and offering 
more evidence on sophisticated improvised explosive devices, which they 
say are traceable to Iran, but vehemently denying they have any plans to 
go to war against the country.

But by all accounts, the imperfect nature of American intelligence 
agencies’ reporting on Iran makes certain conclusions difficult to 
reach. “I just don’t think we have a very acute understanding of the 
internal workings of the regime in Iran,” said Patrick Clawson, an Iran 
expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

+++



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to