http://www.birn.eu.com/en/71/10/2346/

Romanian Police Blamed for Kosovo Protest Carnage

23 02 2007  International police accused of using excessive force during 
riots.

By Jeta Xharra and Krenar Gashi in Pristina and Marian Chiriac in 
Bucharest (Balkan Insight, 23 Feb 07)

UN police from Romania might have overstepped their rules of engagement 
during the bloody violence that followed the controversial rally in 
Pristina on February 10, which resulted in two deaths and injuries to 80 
people, a Balkan Insight investigation can reveal.

The probe, based on exclusive access to film footage of the rally and 
interviews with officers of the Kosovo Police Service, KPS, as well as 
protesters, suggests UN police fired rounds of rubber bullets at the 
rally at close range, sometimes aiming at protesters’ heads.

Experts and human rights organisations say that such action - which has 
already caused turmoil in UNMIK, with the resignation of UNMIK police 
commissioner- is highly improper and against UN regulations on police 
conduct.

In addition, Balkan Insight can reveal that Romanian police have a bad 
record of using force against civilians.

The protest saw the most serious outbreak of unrest in Kosovo since 
nationalist riots in March 2004 led to the deaths of 19 people and left 
thousands of Serbs homeless.

About 3,000 people joined the rally on February 10, held to protest 
against the UN proposal for Kosovo’s final status.

Protesters said it offered too many concessions to Kosovo’s Serbian 
minority and the government in Belgrade. Serbia strongly opposes 
independence for Kosovo, claiming it as an integral part of its own 
territory.

Police used tear gas and rubber bullets when the protesters tried to 
break through police lines. Film footage showed the protestors throwing 
stones and other heavy objects towards the police, including wooden 
placards.

The nationalist Vetevendosje (self-determination) movement, which held 
the protest, has, meanwhile, announced a new rally for March 3, raising 
fears of a fresh confrontation between hard-line supporters of 
independence and the authorities.

Vetevendosje’s charismatic former student leader, Albin Kurti, was 
arrested after the protest and is in detention.

A forensic commission of three international experts and one local 
expert, Arsim Gerxhaliu, confirmed that the autopsy performed on the two 
victims of the protest, Arben Xheladini, 35, and Man Balaj, 30, showed 
the two men died from head wounds inflicted by rubber bullets.

According to the human rights body Amnesty International, rubber bullets 
are known to be potentially lethal and should be treated for practical 
purposes as firearms.

Rubber bullets “should be used only by trained firearms officers and 
then strictly in accordance with the UN Basic Principles on the Use of 
Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officers,” Amnesty said on 
February 15.

UN regulation states that “law enforcement officials shall not use 
firearms against persons except in self-defence or defence of others 
against the imminent threat of death or serious injury”.

Balkan Insight journalists who covered the rally witnessed how UN police 
continued to fire while advancing towards the protesters, even when it 
was apparent the crowd of some 3,000 people was retreating.

After viewing about five hours of film, Balkan Insight journalists have 
seen six instances in which Romanian officers can be seen firing rubber 
bullets directly into the crowd.

Many have described the Romanian action as uncalled for. When the 
footage was re-broadcast in slow motion on Kosovo television, RTK, on 
February 16, Nuredin Ibishi, an expert on police matters and a former 
member of the special police in Yugoslavia, said it was clear the 
Romanians over-reacted and fired at close range.

“These weapons need to be fired at the extremities and towards the lower 
part of people’s bodies and not straight at them, as we see in the film. 
If used at a distance of [only] 20 to 50 metres and if they shoot 
towards the area of the people’s heads, there are no doubt these weapons 
can kill,” said Ibishi.

“At that time, the protestors were running away from the police and the 
police was not under any kind of danger,” he added.

Nevertheless, Steven Schook, deputy to the UN Special Representative in 
Kosovo, agreed the UNMIK police fired rubber bullets in an improper manner.

“People don’t die from the proper use of rubber bullets, that’s for 
sure,” Schook told Balkan Insight on February 15.

The consequences of the protest have caused a serious debate in Kosovo 
and within UNMIK over responsibility for what to many seemed excessive 
police force.

The debate forced the resignations last week of the Interior Minister 
Fatmir Rexhepi, who quit the day after the rally. Steven Curtis, chief 
commissioner of the UNMIK police, resigned on February 14 while the UN 
formed a special commission to investigate the matter.

Schook is convinced that investigation on the protest will be 
successful. “We have taken the investigation out of the hands of the 
police [and put it] into the hands of department of justice and have 
engaged the most aggressive and best prosecutor we have, Bob Dean, to 
look into this investigation thoroughly,” he said.

Schook stressed that the investigation would be in the hands of UN 
officers of other nationalities than the ones who took part in the 
rally. This means Ukrainians, Romanians and Poles would not be involved.

There are 115 members of the Romanian Gendarmerie serving in Kosovo, 
tasked mainly with riot control. As Gendarmerie spokesman Bogdan Nicolae 
put it, they are there “to maintain order during public manifestations”.

Bogdan Nicolae insisted the Romanian police would cooperate fully with 
the probe. They had received “no clear evidence yet that their unit in 
Kosovo used rubber bullets during their mission in Pristina but, if so, 
we are sure the police did their job in accordance with legal procedures”.

Nicolae admitted that Romania’s domestic rules concerning the use of 
rubber bullets did not currently apply to its police serving in 
international missions such as in Kosovo.

In Kosovo, he explained, Romanian officers operated “in accordance… with 
rules specially designed for war-torn zones. So, in such theatre of 
operations as in Kosovo, we comply to these rules and not to local ones”.

Schook said, “I consider Kosovo a very late post-conflict environment - 
ready for the next step, its status resolution and ready for UNMIK to 
leave and have a new much smaller EU mission instead. That is where I 
believe we are now.”

But Romanian anti-riot police forces are criticised in their home 
country as well. Human rights groups in Romania noted that they have 
drawn attention before to the tactics of the country’s police.

Istvan Haller, of the organisation Pro Europa League, LPE, said it had 
extensively documented a case last September in which police wounded 30 
Roma during a raid on a Roma neighbourhood in Apalina, central Transylvania.

“One person had 17 rubber bullets in his back, which shows the extent of 
the force used during the police raid,” Haller told Balkan Insight.

LPE and the Romanian branch of the Helsinki Committee have both 
criticised alleged excessive use of force by the Romanian police in reports.

A report of the Romanian Helsinki Committee, APADOR-CH, has described it 
as a reflection of “police lack of respect towards the fundamental right 
to life on the one hand and insufficient professional training on the 
other”.

Members of the KPS told Balkan Insight of the police failures that led 
to the deaths and injuries of February 10.

One criticised poor levels of planning before the protest began. “When 
the police commissioner asked in advance which units possessed anti-riot 
gear, the Polish, Rumanian and Ukrainian units came out as the ones with 
the equipment,” he said. “Not much attention was paid towards when and 
how the rubber bullets were going to be used.”

Kosovo’s mainly Albanian local police force is lightly armed. The KPS 
possesses tear-gas and batons but has no access to rubber bullets.

Other KPS officers said former police chief Curtis made a mistake in 
trying to keep local officers out of the loop.

“While the previous police commissioner used to let us make the first 
draft when it came to dealing with protests, Curtis kept us outside the 
planning room,” said one officer.

Another KPS officer present at the protest blamed the KPS for failing to 
assume leadership and for being comfortable with its lack of responsibility.

“It is true we were kept out of the planning of this operation but the 
KPS at no point protested against this,” he said. “KPS prefer not having 
to take responsibility for serious or sensitive actions.”

Other KPS officers complained to Balkan Insight that they were not 
supplied with gas masks for the rally, which left them at a disadvantage.

“We only had a certain number of gas masks and not everybody was 
equipped with them, so when the clashes started we were trying to cover 
our eyes because the tear gas affected us, too,” said one officer.

“Not equipping our own ranks with gas masks when we knew we were likely 
to use tear gas was another sign of bad planning and of the lack of 
coordination between local and international police units,” said a more 
senior KPS officer.

Some local police admitted they were reluctant to get involved in 
heavy-duty policing of fellow Albanians. “We are there to keep order but 
beating up protestors reminds people of images of the Serbian police in 
the 1980s and 1990s,” said one officer.

“This history means we were more tolerant than we should have been, 
which meant it was left to others to do that (disperse the crowd) and 
only international officers had the means,” said another KPS officer.

“We had to react because protesters were trying to break through our 
cordon and get to the government’s buildings.”

Ibishi said the police could have tried other means to break up the 
crowd, such as water cannons. However, Veton Elshani, KPS spokesperson, 
said neither KPS nor UNMIK police had any.

Both the KPS and UNMIK say they have learned from the experience and 
even before the report of the investigation is publicised have taken 
measures to ensure the events of February 10 do not happen again.

“UNMIK has taken an untypical, unprecedented decision in asking its 
chief police commissioner to resign, which did not happen even after 
March [2004] riots and shows how seriously we are taking this matter,” 
said Schook.

Some want more than individual resignations; they want UN officers to be 
stripped of immunity from prosecution in Kosovo’s local courts.

Sarah Maliqi, of the Youth Initiative for Human Rights, said, “The 
concern remains that as in previous cases when international police 
officers did something wrong, the worse that can happen to them is being 
sent home.”

A February 15 statement from Amnesty International, also asks for 
international officers in UNMIK to be stripped of their immunity.

“Any UNMIK police officers suspected of unlawful conduct should be 
immediately suspended; they should not be repatriated but should remain 
in Kosovo until the inquiry establishes whether there are grounds for a 
criminal prosecution,” said the human rights body.

Jeta Xharra is BIRN Kosovo Director. Marian Chiriac is Romania Country 
Director. Krenar Gashi is BIRN Kosovo Editor. Balkan Insight is BIRN’s 
online publication.

+++



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/4It09A/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups - Join or create groups, clubs, forums & communities. Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups - Join or create groups, clubs, forums &amp; 
communities. is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to