http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\02\24\story_24-2-2007_pg3_3

VIEW: Militant Islam and writ of State— Farhat Taj

I am also concerned about the gift of books to the occupied library by 
Jamia Hafsa. These books will be on jihadi Islam and misogyny. Hundreds 
of madrasssas are awash with such books and now the public library in 
Islamabad is also likely to have them. Could the state please again bend 
down and respectfully refuse the gift from the Jamia

The state of Pakistan has once again surrendered its writ to Islamic 
militants.

Take the case of the recent ‘breakthrough’ over the issue of the 
demolition of two mosques built on encroached public land in Islamabad 
and the occupation of a government children’s library by armed madrassa 
students of Jamia Hafsa.

Reportedly, the government has started reconstruction of the demolished 
Amir Himza mosque at its original site and formed a clerics-dominated 
committee to look into the issues relating to the illegal construction 
of the mosque and encroachments with regard to mosques and madrassas in 
Islamabad. The committee is to recommend to the authorities the proper 
mode of deciding such issues in accordance with the Islamic perspective.

In return, the administration of Jamia Hafsa has decided to allow the 
children to use the library, though it would continue to control the 
library until the government meets all the demands of the students’ 
action committee of Jamia Hafsa, including the enforcement of sharia in 
Pakistani with immediate effect. Moreover, the students’ action 
committee would donate books worth Rs100,000 to the library.

The Pakistani media splashed photos next day of clerics celebrating 
their ‘victory’ by distributing sweets.

The said mosques and madrasssas are not only built on encroached state 
land, they were also described as a security risk by state authorities 
when they moved into demolish them. The security-risk assessment was 
correct given the ideology of the seminarians and the fact that they are 
located on the main roads and highways where state guests and 
authorities frequently travel.

The ‘breakthrough’ sends two clear messages to the people of Pakistan: 
one, each time the Islamic militants roar, the state of Pakistan will 
cower and cave in. Even as the state brutally deals with other 
‘troublemakers’, it will never cease to appease the armed Islamists. For 
example, the state has crushed and is once again in the process of doing 
that, the Baloch nationalists. But the appeasement of Islamists 
continues since the early 1950s of the anti-Ahmadiyya movement.

Two, where would this appeasement take the nation? Many in the West 
dread the day the Islamists might control Pakistan’s nuclear facilities. 
This scenario is rejected by Islamabad. It may be an exaggerated one. 
But if one were to strictly go by the logic of state actions, as in this 
case, what could stop the Islamists from moving from occupying a library 
to a ministry and so on. After all, did not the youth belonging to one 
sect besiege and occupy Islamabad during the eighties?

What guarantees can the state give to the people of Pakistan and the 
rest of the world that the country’s nuclear assets will not fall into 
the hands of the Islamic radicals? The army would say that it has 
elaborate command and control and safety mechanisms and that this can 
never happen. Perhaps. But how about looking at it in another way. What 
might happen if the Islamists were to infiltrate the ranks of the armed 
forces?

I have had several discussions with militant madrassa students and 
teachers in Pakistan. They say they would use everything, including its 
nuclear weapons to ‘defend’ Islam. Their defence of Islam does not rule 
out the possibility of using the weapons of mass destruction against 
those people in Pakistan whom the militants view as ‘too stubborn to 
come back to the folds of Islam’.

Armed Islamists have already made important inroads into the social 
landscape of Pakistan. The Federally Administered Tribal Area, FATA, is 
already under their control and so are some southern districts of NWFP. 
Now they have won in the capital Islamabad as well, despite the fact 
that the Council of Islamic Ideology and the Ulema of Wafaqul Madaris 
supported the government’s view that unauthorised construction of 
mosques and madrasssas on public land is un-Islamic and illegal.

If the state cannot enforce its writ in Islamabad, forget about FATA. 
The people of FATA are resisting the Islamists in whatever way possible. 
For example, some brave people of Bajaur agency are defying their ‘ban’ 
on shaving men’s beards, according to a report in this newspaper. 
Seemingly, the Islamists in Tank (a settled district) are threatening 
the local businessmen to stop the sale and purchase of women’s clothes. 
The business is still going on despite the state’s inability to extend 
any protection to the buyers and sellers of women’s clothes in the area.

In Dara Adam Khel, girl-schools have been attacked. Many brave parents 
of the area continue to send their daughters to schools. It is utterly 
shameful that instead of providing security to girls’ schools in Dara 
Adam Khel, the state of Pakistan’s appointed administrator for the area, 
the political agent, has reportedly asked the principals to make all 
girls wear a tent-like all-encompassing burqa. This is what the 
militants in the area had demanded.

One can point out hundreds of small yet important examples of how people 
have been resisting the Islamic militants among them in the face of 
state’s failure to protect them. There are also hundreds of examples to 
show that the writ of the state has perished in the face of demands by 
armed Islamists. After all, why is the state is not dealing with them 
according to the law of the land? Cynics in Pakistan have a point when 
they refer to some kind of mullah-military alliance at the state level 
in Pakistan.

The government of General Pervez Musharraf is very conscious of 
improving Pakistan’s image abroad. It’s a lost cause as long as the 
state continues to capitulate before obscurantism.

I am also concerned about the gift of books to the occupied library by 
Jamia Hafsa. These books will be on jihadi Islam and misogyny. Hundreds 
of madrasssas are awash with such books and now the public library in 
Islamabad is also likely to have them. Could the state please again bend 
down and respectfully refuse the gift from the Jamia?

Farhat Taj is a PhD research fellow at the Centre for Women and Gender 
Studies, University of Oslo

+++




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kOt0.A/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to